“We are Forerunners. Guardians of all that exists. The roots of the Galaxy have grown deep under our careful tending. Where there is life, the wisdom of our countless generations has saturated the soil. Our strength is a luminous sun, towards which all intelligence blossoms… And the impervious shelter, beneath which it has prospered.”

Friday T&A: World Aflame Edition

by | Jan 10, 2020 | fat girl jihad | 14 comments

It’s the first Friday of 2020, the Year of the Crusher, and what a week it has been already.

On the global front, there are wildfires burning out of control in Australia – and it doesn’t matter what the lying tools of the mainstream (((media))) tell you, those fires are NOT caused by “climate change”, but rather by a combination of greenie-weenie eco-stupidity and f***wads with matches deliberately setting fires.

Beyond that, of course, we have a royal cock-up in the works in Ye Olde Englande, thanks to Harry Windsor and the Half-Blood Princess. Everything that I have seen so far indicates that the British press, which once fawned so obsequiously over the half-black older divorcee who would become Prince Harry’s future wife, has turned on her with a viciousness and rage that has to be seen to be believed.

And that’s before we get to the fact that His Most Illustrious, Noble, Benevolent, August, and Legendary Celestial Majesty, the God-Emperor of Mankind, Donaldus Triumphus Magnus Astra, the First of His Name, continues with the WINNING!!! after forcing the Iranians into a corner from which they have desperately tried to save face – and failed utterly.

Unfortunately, the Persians did such a shitty job of looking tough that they apparently shot down a plane full of innocent Ukrainians, Canadians, Germans, and Brits – thereby overnight turning themselves into international pariahs that even the Russians aren’t going to try to defend.

You can claim, perhaps with justification, that it is all rather convenient for the Americans and Brits and Canadians to claim that the Persians shot down Ukraine International Airlines flight PS752, right after Iran tried to bomb the bejeezus out of American assets in a transparently cack-handed attempt to save face, and that it could easily be a false flag operation. At least some of the evidence raises questions about whether the Iranians actually did in fact shoot it down.

Yet, as the RT bods themselves admit, the air crew on that flight never indicated that something was wrong inside the aircraft. The plane itself had a spotless safety record, the Boeing 737-800 (which is quite a different animal from the extremely buggy and dangerous MAX version) is a superb aircraft, and the captain and crew were all highly experienced.

Think about it: if the Iranians really didn’t shoot down that plane, and could credibly claim that either a Western power did, or that a mechanical malfunction brought the jet down, do you seriously believe that they would miss an opportunity to claim a moral victory over their hated foes? Especially given that Iran Air Flight 655 was shot down by the USS Vincennes in 1988, and the Iranians (rightly) raked America over the coals for it?

It’s all happening at a rate to make one’s head spin, but rest assured, my friends, the God-Emperor is not spiraling and there is a plan in place. It’s just not one that you and I, as mere mortals, can understand. Even the God-Emperor himself probably doesn’t understand it. He is merely a great man called by the Lord to do the nearly impossible.

Now, after all of that heavy stuff, let’s get to the fun. You all know why you’re here. It’s for the weekly hot chick, so here she is.

Her name is Rosanna Arkle, she is 31 years old (and beginning to show it – Antipodean women DO NOT age well), and she hails from Whangerei in Kiwiland, but was originally born in Australia. She is famous for… well, being famous, I guess. She has appeared on the cover of various “lad mags” as a glamour model, and she runs her own “fitfluencer” business via Instathot.

Does anyone else think that “fitfluencer” sounds like a particularly nasty and virulent respiratory disease?

Anyway, she is your thot for the weekend. Enjoy.

Happy Friday, boys. You know the routine – eat, drink, sleep, lift, shoot, spar, play, and come back refreshed and ready for the CRUSHING!!!

Subscribe to Didactic Mind

* indicates required
Email Format

Recent Thoughts

If you enjoyed this article, please:

  • Visit the Support page and check out the ways to support my work through purchases and affiliate links;
  • Email me and connect directly;
  • Share this article via social media;

14 Comments

  1. Post Alley Crackpot

    "… those fires are NOT caused by 'climate change', but rather by a combination of greenie-weenie eco-stupidity and f***wads with matches deliberately setting fires."

    Now that Australia's trying to embrace the Chinese way of thinking, perhaps it's time for them to embrace Confucian punishments and justice as well.

    Those found guilty of setting these fires should first be made to set everything they own on fire and to watch all of it burn to ashes.

    After this, they should serve out their prison sentences in wooden prisons fabricated from tea tree and eucalpytus, the infamous exploding trees of Australia.

    In true Confucian fashion, this prison wouldn't have NO SMOKING signs, because the Confucian system encourages stupid people to amplify their own punishments, and so anyone who burns down the prison would also have to rebuild it.

    Australia has vast open ranges such as the Nullarbor where implementing such a scheme could be done safely relative to the rest of the Australian population.

    Those who would claim that this would be a "cruel and unusual" imprisonment even for such people as these should note that these people setting fires also don't have to set them, and so rather than delivering equality of punishment as so often demanded, delivering sufficiency of justice appropriate to the crime serves the ends of prevention much better.

    File under: Singaporean-style Modest Proposals. πŸ™‚

    Reply
    • Didact

      You sir are on fire.

      (*groans*)

      All of these strike me as highly sensible ideas. Which, of course, is exactly why the Singaporeans and Chinese implement them – and the Australians don't.

      After all, it would be KROOL AND HARTLESS to hold people accountable for their actions, eh, what?

      Reply
  2. Johnny

    Good choice on today's Thot.

    Going back to our prior discussion, you portrayed five Indian actresses as (correctly) the best of the best of India. However, the prettiest one (by consensus including you), was Katrina Kaif, who is half white. Hence, she doesn't even count for these purposes.

    SingleDudeTravel once said that an Indian girl can become a star if she just has an 8 face and a 6 body. I didn't believe that at first, but now, your content seems to prove that it is true. I think the Austronesian genetic component is the real beauty-destroyer.

    I suspect that that half-white/half-Indian women from the West (or Iranian women who learn Hindi) will eventually displace Indian women from all glamor roles meant for Indians. Maria Sokolovski is limited to jobs where she doesn't have to speak, but once someone comparable learns enough of the language, it is game over for aspiring Indian actresses/models/talk show hosts.

    Reply
    • Didact

      However, the prettiest one (by consensus including you), was Katrina Kaif, who is half white. Hence, she doesn't even count for these purposes.

      Yeah, I'll concede that. In fact, if you do a comparison of the "hottest" actresses in Bollywood right now and peruse the lists that are compiled on the subject, you'll find that the half-breeds are INVARIABLY more attractive than the natives. Narghis Fakri and Evelyn Sharma both come to mind.

      SingleDudeTravel once said that an Indian girl can become a star if she just has an 8 face and a 6 body.

      I remember that article. Charlie Bushmeister also pointed out the fact that most Bollywood aspirants have no clue what the inside of a gym looks like. And it's true. If you go to an Indian gym, the women that you see in there are either hambeasts or skinny-fat uggos.

      I suspect that that half-white/half-Indian women from the West (or Iranian women who learn Hindi) will eventually displace Indian women from all glamor roles meant for Indians.

      Nah. Too few of them around. For every such woman, there are thirty to a hundred others. And that is before we get to two very crucial factors.

      First, the Indian film industry is extremely fragmented, due to the multilingual nature of the country. Therefore, Indian actresses who act in Hindi or Bengali films tend to have a very hard time breaking through into the much lower-brow, but larger, south Indian market, where languages such as Tamil, Telugu, Kannada, and Konkani are prevalent.

      And second, the glamour industries in general and the film industry in particular are highly dynastic in nature, to a degree that make the Kennedys and Clintons look like paragons of meritocracy, transparency, and achievement by comparison.

      I wasn't kidding when I wrote earlier that I went to school with Sonam Kapoor. She is distantly related to Kareena and Karisma Kapoor and as such is a distaff member of the famous Kapoor family film dynasty. As such, she has a level of connectivity and contacts within the Bollywood industry that no outsider can match.

      once someone comparable learns enough of the language

      Doesn't make much of a difference. Indians can spot bad Hindi speakers miles away. That is why Sunny Leone has such a hard time breaking into Bollywood – despite having vastly greater name recognition than any of her peers (thanks to her infamy as a porn actress), and being far better looking due to her Canadian upbringing and porn career, she does not get good film roles in India. Her Hindi is passable at best – it's not an easy language to learn.

      Reply
    • Johnny

      And second, the glamour industries in general and the film industry in particular are highly dynastic in nature, to a degree that make the Kennedys and Clintons look like paragons of meritocracy, transparency, and achievement by comparison.

      OK. Then Bollywood (forget the regional little industries; Bollywood is the only one non-Indians have ever heard about) will wither away. If they are highly dynastic, then they can't just be pushing 8 face/6 body daughters of their own forever, even to Indian men who have never seen a 7 in real life. Eyeballs will find their way to the Maria Sokolovskis and other either half-Indians or non-Indians.

      This also explains why this very prolific film industry produces so few films that a non-Indian audience wants to see. I mean, they could at least make 1% of the films in English and meant for an International audience, but they can't seem to do that despite the high profit margins.

      I don't think 'Slumdog Millionaire' was a very good film, but it did earn 30x its production costs just because it could sell to Dollar/Pound/Euro audiences. Hell, if they make something good enough for Netflix, it could earn 100x its production cost. So many people, yet they can't even produce this.

      Reply
    • Didact

      If they are highly dynastic, then they can't just be pushing 8 face/6 body daughters of their own forever, even to Indian men who have never seen a 7 in real life

      I think you underestimate (a) the exceptionally nepotistic and closed-off nature of the film industry in India, and (b) the outright chauvinism of the average Indian.

      The half-breeds that I pointed out above are basically unheard of in north and east India. The real superstars are women like Karisma Kapoor and Deepika Padukone – Indian born and bred. Foreign stars like Sunny Leone have found it exceptionally difficult to break into the scene.

      This also explains why this very prolific film industry produces so few films that a non-Indian audience wants to see

      Untrue. Bollywood films are one of India's major export commodities throughout Southeast Asia – Indonesians love that shit – as well as the MENA countries.

      Western audiences might find Bollywood films a bit ridiculous, but they do quite well in Third World countries.

      Hell, if they make something good enough for Netflix, it could earn 100x its production cost

      The list of Bollywood movies and films, including Netflix original content, that are available for streaming right now, is considerably longer than you might think.

      Reply
    • Johnny

      I think you underestimate (a) the exceptionally nepotistic and closed-off nature of the film industry in India, and (b) the outright chauvinism of the average Indian.

      I am certain that I underestimate it. Just when I think India can't become more underwhelming, you often tell me how it is even worse than that.

      But chauvanistic? By that, you mean that the typical Indian man will say that a half-breed 9 or a a foreign 9+ like Maria Sokolovski is not as good as their Bollywood 7, or their local-chick 5s? Really?

      I mean, I have been aware that Indians don't know the difference between a 6 and a 10, but still. I guess this is an extension of that same concept.

      I guess this is quite related to how the prettiest 'black' women are mulattos or even quatroons. Halle Berry is surely just 30-40% black, and hence is the prettiest 'black' woman of her era.

      is considerably longer than you might think.

      But those are meant for Indian audiences (and arguably prevent them from assimilating in the West if an Indian in the West watches those). I am talking about a film that could actually be marketed to Western audience, and thus earn revenue comparable to a mid-revenue Hollywood film (i.e. earns $400M). The Indian filmmaker could make a huge ROI. Why is this market so unaddressed, even by the indies? Or are there no indies period?

      Reply
    • Didact

      By that, you mean that the typical Indian man will say that a half-breed 9 or a a foreign 9+ like Maria Sokolovski is not as good as their Bollywood 7, or their local-chick 5s? Really?

      Yes, really.

      The average Indian blue-pill chode has a serious love-hate relationship with white girls. Indian men are told by their mothers that white girls are trashy, slutty, easy, and bad wife material, and that it is better for them to marry the girl that their parents choose for them – never mind that she might look like the wrong end of a dog.

      As such, Indian men grow up with this very weird complex about white chicks. On the one hand, they are "forbidden fruit", to be desired and lusted after and creeped on. On the other hand, they are treated with abominable stupidity by most Indian guys.

      Indian guys are taught that white women are for fun – but are never taught the skills necessary to get white girls. This, despite the fact that Indian guys who make serious improvements in their lives often end up doing better than a lot of white and Asian guys as a result.

      I've personally seen a Russian woman complain about how dumb Indians are when it comes to white women and foreigners, and how unwanted their advances are. I've seen that same woman get asked to take selfies with multiple Indian guys on a beach, simply because she was attractive and different.

      Every one of those guys would still rather marry an Indian girl, because that's what they have been told is Right and Good and True.

      Why is this market so unaddressed, even by the indies? Or are there no indies period?

      That's very easy to answer. Indian movies are filmed for a completely different audience. An Indian movie is tied in to a song-and-dance number and that is part of the package. Western audiences long ago abandoned that nonsense in favour of straightforward plot and character development, but in Indian films, the actors and actresses are expected to dance and lip-sync to songs designed to become chart-topping smash hits.

      Any Indian movie that does not conform to these expectations is going to have problems in the domestic box office. And any Indian film that tries to aim for Western markets is going to have problems getting distribution and licensing.

      Crossovers in this regard only really work when an Indian studio bankrolls and finances a Western project – which is what happened with the superb film Dredd, starring Karl Urban. That was bankrolled by Reliance Entertainment but directed and produced by Westerners. And that is but one among many examples – Mira Nair's adaptation of Vanity Fair also comes to mind.

      The only other realistic examples involve using an Indian cast for a Western project, like the execrable Bride and Prejudice, which had both Western and Asian actors and was quite successful at the box office.

      That is not to say that Indians cannot make superb movies. They absolutely can. The famous Indian film director Satyajit Ray was often mentioned in the same breath as Ingmar Bergman, for instance.

      Reply
    • Johnny

      OK, so :

      i) Indian women are extremely overrated, perhaps the most overrated in the world, because Indian blue-pill chodes have been brainwashed into overrating them to an obscene degree.

      ii) Globalization has not affected India for the better, since the Indian film industry neither uses its advantageous cost structure to make a film that can do well for Western audiences on Netflix (hence bypassing distribution bottlenecks), nor will they hire half-Indian women who are prettier than their Bollywood 7s.

      iii) At least the fashion industry should hire half-Indian or foreign (Maria Sokolovski-type) models, since there is no speaking role and no dynastic regime. Why is this not the case?

      iv) It is not merely white women that Indian men are chodes about. Even nearby places like Iran, Thailand, etc. have vastly better-looking women than Indian women, and perhaps culture that is somewhat relatable. But the Indian chodes are oblivious to how bad they have it.

      v) Why did India get saddled with a big chunk of Austro-Aboriginal genetics, when the Phillippines, Indonesia, Malaysia, etc. should have this problem to a greater extent? Yet, none of those places have women as unattractive as India.

      Reply
    • Didact

      i) I reckon that the most overrated women in the world are probably Chinese, but that's just my opinion;

      ii) Globalisation has certainly influenced India for the better economically and culturally. There is no doubt or question about this. I've been visiting India for 30 years and I have seen immense changes during that time. And in fact Western trends and fashions have made their way to India and affected local fashion sense – for better AND worse. But in terms of improving the looks of Indian women specifically? No improvement.

      iii) Because (a) there aren't anywhere near enough of them, (b) they are way more expensive than local Indian women, (c) too many Western models have that sick anorexic look that Indians do not actually like, and (d) unlike many Western fashion designers, who are gay and therefore both consciously and unconsciously design clothes to be worn by androgynous boy-like skinny models with thin hips and almost no breasts, Indian fashion designers make their clothes with local women in mind.

      iv) Most Indian men don't travel outside of India and consume an entertainment diet that is almost exclusively Indian. You know that saying about the one-eyed in the land of the blind? That applies in India quite well. Remember too that only about 35% of India's population is urban. The vast majority is rural, and transport and power networks in India are pretty shoddy in the countryside. This affects the speed of transmission of information and culture greatly. I've seen firsthand what things are like in rural India. It is vastly more isolated and cocooned than the equivalent in America or Britain.

      v) I have no expertise in genetics, but from what I can tell, your argument is not correct. India has very little, if anything, by way of Austro-Aboriginal genetics. In fact, the mtDNA history show that present European DNA originated from somewhere in South Asia.

      Reply
    • Johnny

      ii) But in terms of improving the looks of Indian women specifically? No improvement.

      This answer a question I had for a long time. If Indian women adopt Western clothing and other habits, but their looks don't improve, that is actually a step back. For a 5 or even a 6, a saree is better than Yoga pants, since Yoga pants are a negative unless a woman is 8+.

      v) OK, but then what is the explanation? There is a certain ugliness in the Indian genotype (present in all of South Asia except the northernmost extremity) that is not present in nearby countries (Iran, Thailand, etc.).

      Plus, when looking at pictures of Austro Aboriginals, they look far more like Indians/Sri Lankans than they look like any other major race).

      Lastly, the 'dark' genetic component is definitely not from East Africa, since if that were the case, Indians, as a hybrid of white Turkic Caucasians and Somali/Ethiopian blacks, would be MUCH better looking (and taller).

      Furthermore, the Andamanese and Sentinalese, as Steve Sailer writes about, are probably the remnants of the original population of India before Caucasoid invasions from the North.

      By process of elimination, one really does have to conclude that the indiginous 'Dravidian' population of the southern two-thirds of South Asia really is closer to Australoid than anything else. There is no other possible component could be a looks-destroyer to such a degree.

      Reply
    • Dire Badger

      Sure there is. When the Tower of Babel fell, they looked down and realized that they got the short straw.

      That and the Overly-healthy Mongols never quite penetrated that far south.

      Reply
    • Jack

      What ethnicity are you

      Reply
      • Didact

        Who are you asking?

        Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Didactic Mind Archives

Didactic Mind by Category

%d bloggers like this: