Trawling through YouTube on a Sunday evening can be interesting. You never quite know what you’ll find. In my case, I started on a vlog by good old El Capitan in which he watched a video by a woman in her mid-thirties who plans to freeze her eggs.
This is that very video:
Now here is where it gets interesting.
That video was from more than five years ago. Today, Ms. House is 41 years old – and if you take a look at her current YouTube channel, or her website, you will learn something about her from what is there.
Or rather, from what is not there.
Namely – no husband, and no children.
Now, here is the thing: she is married – as of last year – and she does have a very young son. So she did end up getting what she wanted, eventually.
But it is virtually certain that she had to “settle” in order to do it.
Take a look at her now-husband:
View this post on Instagram
That guy should, by rights, be able to get a woman in her late twenties or early thirties. He is in good shape and looks pretty decent.
Instead, he married a 40-year-old woman who had clearly been around the block a few times. And he himself obviously has children from previous relationships.
Looking at the details, it is obvious to all that both Mr. Schmelzer and Ms. House there settled, hard, for each other.
And this, it should be noted, is a world-famous “dating coach” who calls herself the “man-whisperer”, and promises to be the woman who can help you achieve your goal of landing your dream man or woman.
Yet if you look at her personal life, she is evidently a spectacular example of what a woman should not do.
That is as classic an example to young women everywhere of “Do as I say, not as I do”, if I ever saw one.
The hard truth that women absolutely need to hear these days is very simple: STOP SCREWING AROUND.
Both in literal and metaphorical terms, it is the biggest mistake that a young woman can make. There is absolutely no escaping the realities of female biology and there is no point in raising our daughters to believe that they can have it all.
The biggest mistake that Western culture has made, in a LONG list of oh-so-many of them over the last fifty years, is to tell young girls that they have the freedom to do whatever they want. They do not. There is a real and terrible price to female freedom, and our daughters and sisters always end up paying it eventually.
The harsh reality is that women peak in attractiveness and desirability at around the age of 24 or so – and, in fact,if the data from online dating websites is anything to go by, they actually peak at around 18 and then go downhill fast from there.
As Manosphere writers have been pointing out for years, men and women have fundamentally incompatible mating strategies. This is pretty straightforward for anyone but a feminist to understand. For the benefit of the new people – of which there tend to be a few, every so often – I’ll break it down here.
Men are biologically wired to have sex with as many women as possible. And that is because of two reasons. First, we produce huge amounts of sperm – because, second, we do not really live long enough to use it, on average. If you look at your own genetic history, you will discover that you have approximately two female ancestors for every male ancestor.
How the hell is that possible? Well, it happens because most men throughout history never reproduced. Many of them never even had sex at all – they died virgins. They died of hardship, cold, disease, starvation, and war – quite often at the hands of a relatively small number of men who did go on to have children, partly because they were good at gathering and provisioning resources, and partly because they killed off the competition.
The classic example here is Genghis Khan. The legendary warlord is a direct ancestor to approximately 0.5% of the entire world’s population – because: he is responsible for the deaths of between 20 and 40 MILLION people, most of them men; his harem was something between 2,000 and 3,000 women, and it is rumoured that he fathered roughly 20,000 direct descendants through them (!!!!!); and his sons were nearly as prolific in terms of capturing beautiful women and having sex with them.
(Quote attributed to the great Khan: “The greatest pleasure is to vanquish your enemies and chase them before you, to rob them of their wealth and see those dear to them bathed in tears, to ride their horses and clasp to your bosom their wives and daughters”. That’s where the Manosphere’s favourite Conan quote comes from.)
So men want to have sex. Lots of it. But we chaps have a rather big problem here.
You see, women are biologically wired to seek out and mate with the highest-value man that they can possibly secure. Why? Because they are physically weaker, because they produce a very small number of eggs – only about 400 or so over their lifetimes – and because the cost of pregnancy to women is extraordinarily high. So they seek out men who can protect them, provide for them, and raise their children well.
These strategies do not match. Mathematically and logically, without some sort of compensating or matching factor, there is no way to reconcile these approaches such that all men and all women are satisfied. There is not even a way to make sure that the majority of either sex is satisfied.
That is, until you introduce one critically important development in human history:
Monogamous marriage.
This is the one truly successful method that we as a species have devised to match the radically different and competing objectives of a man and a woman – through voluntary and beneficial mutual trade.
A marriage is a very simple concept once you strip away all of the legal, religious, and spiritual significance. The man trades his resources and guarantees of protection for access to sex and a strong chance to pass on his genetic code. The woman trades her sex and civilising influence for those resources and guarantees.
There is rather more to monogamous marriage than this, obviously – there is a reason why Christians insist that marriage is a covenant between Man, Woman, and God, and that its primary purpose is procreation, not pleasure. I am deliberately dumbing it down here, but I recognise and fully endorse the other, civilisationally stabilising reasons for its existence.
This covenant has been perhaps the single most powerful and important foundational force for civilisation that we have ever seen. I really have a hard time thinking of a more vital development than this. It does not matter what culture you look at; all of the truly successful ones have this extremely powerful bonding element of monogamous marriage in common. And all of the unsuccessful ones (*cough Islam cough*) either don’t spend much time and energy on marriage, or do away with the entire idea of enforced monogamy.
The benefits of marriage are heavily weighted toward women, to be sure. But there is an important caveat involved here: the women in question have to be worthy of marriage in reproductive terms.
And that is where young women these days are making a huge mess of their lives.
There are a handful of axiomatic facts that women ought to be taught by their mothers from the day that they are old enough to keep time to music.
First: the more men a woman sleeps with, the lower her worth. Men and women bond with sexual partners in very different ways. When a man sleeps with a woman, he leaves part of his soul behind with her – but she leaves a MUCH bigger part behind with him. The disparity is such that a woman who has slept with just two or three men has roughly the same risk of filing for divorce as a man who has slept with NINETEEN women.
Second: the God of Biomechanics is absolutely real, and absolutely ruthless. Women do not have much time to make the most of their looks, youth, and beauty. Women have a definite time clock; not for nothing is it said that men age like fine wine, while women age like milk.
Third: women are happiest in committed, monogamous marriages. Husbands and children make women much, much happier than careers and cats.
And that is precisely why, when you watch a woman like this one talk about why she is single – and in the process reveal a rather astonishing lower bound on how much dick she has taken:
So basically she banged at least 7 different guys before she turned 30. Given how messed up the modern (modren?) dating market is in much of the Western world, especially the US and UK, it’s probably safe to double that number.
You end up feeling absolutely ZERO sympathy for them when they film a video a year later about how they are freezing their eggs in order to preserve their rapidly fading chances of motherhood:
I came across those videos thanks to our good friend Adam Piggott, the Gentleman Adventurer, and he makes an excellent point about such women:
They lie.
They lie to themselves. They lie to their family. They lie to their friends. They lie to the world.
They pretend that they are happy dating and sleeping around and being generally unbearable as romantic partners. And then they wake up at around the age of 28-29 and realise, “Holy shit, I’m about to turn 30, and I can already see that I’m not as young and beautiful as I once was, and for some reason I’m just not happy.”
Their problem is that they cannot figure out why they are not happy. And that is because they lie.
The thing is, such women used to be able to get away with lying because we men were stupid enough to enable it. But now that is no longer the case.
You will note that in the very first video above, from 5 years ago, comments are totally disabled. If they were not, I would love to see what people have to say. I’m guessing that the responses from men would be absolutely savage.
They certainly are for the last video up there. I perused through those comments and very, very few of the men there were in any way sympathetic. The general theme of the comments ran something like, “serves you bloody well right for taking so many cocks as a young woman”.
I agree entirely with this.
In literal terms, it is, as I noted above, axiomatic that the more cock a woman takes, the less valuable she is. And in metaphorical terms, the more time that she wastes sleeping around, partying, and enjoying the fruits of her youth, the less time and energy she will have to get a family started when it really matters.
These are the harsh but necessary things that our daughters must hear. Every father who considers himself a true Man of the West needs to tell his daughters: “Don’t go for a college education – instead, do everything you can to make yourself a high-value woman, and use that to attract a high-value man who will love you and look after you, and then get yourself thoroughly knocked up, preferably repeatedly, so that you can give him wonderful and happy children”.
Women can go to school later in life. They can work from home. They can do many, many things to earn money in honourable and respectable ways that do not require them to become office drones, and they can do plenty to have fun that does not involve falling out of clubs at 3am in order to vomit in the back of a taxi on the way back to some random guy’s place for a one-night stand.
Women who freeze their eggs do so because they have squandered ALL of the vast bounties that God in His eternal wisdom gave them. They should not then be surprised when men like us refuse to pay full retail price on a run-down jalopy with tens of thousands of miles on the clock and a broken-down engine under the clitoral hood.





6 Comments
Didact,
Yup. I think the most fundamental thing we need to do is to
a) discourage most kids from going to university (until it burns down and we can rebuild it) Trades are just as honourable as the professions. They pay just as well with far less headaches. More importantly, they'd give kids, especially guys, will give them a sense of pride and purpose
2) As you pointed out, girls/women can easily go to school after the kids are grown up. What they need are to learn trades like sewing, cooking, acccounting , etc. They too will be much happier. As I pointed out as Vox's site: deep down women really hate going to the office and leave junior at the daycare among other things.
2b) Rehabilitate the stay at home mom. It's just as sound a choice as being a scientist; so why the attitude?
3) A very thorough, radical rething of what's the good life? To me at my age and regrets; get married early, stay married; have lots of kids and fight companies that don't pay decent salaries to dad's who support a family
Those are just some thoughts.
Thanks again for a provocative post.
xavier
Didact:
Some other facts about Ms. House:
Her marriage to Mr. Schmelzer is her third marriage. According to her website, she was married first at 21 for a few months, again in her late 20s for 4 years, and now, at 40, to Mr. Schmelzer.
Her son was born when she was 37, in "another relationship". One wonders whether that was really a relationship or if it was from a sperm donor matched with her frozen eggs.
Troy Schmelzer is a partner at the LA office of Baker and Hostetler. He's a high powered high octane intellectual property lawyer – a highly specialized , highly paid practice area. He holds degrees in electrical engineering and law – so he's possibly kind of a geeky type. By the dates of his education he went straight from his BS in electrical engineering to law school so it's doubtful he ever worked as an engineer. He has 3 kids by a prior marriage/relationship. By education dates he's at least 51 years old. He's probably pulling down at least $400K annually.
This is a guy who is dating in his age range. But he could have dated someone with a better track record and with no kids. He doesn't think he settled, I would bet. Ms. House is very, very attractive for her age, easily top 5%. She could easily have snagged this guy when she was 22 and he was 32. She could easily have gotten a top man by age 25.
This marriage ended before your story came out. She was pregnant when they separated and now it seems as though he's a deadbeat dad. How about them apples for "Mr. Schmeltzer." Laurel is actually way out of his league. Him good looking? Eck.
This marriage ended before your story came out. She was pregnant when they separated and now it seems as though he's a deadbeat dad.
Evidence?
You could very well be right. I don't particularly care about what happens to Mrs. (or Ms., now, perhaps) House, but I'd like to make sure I've got my facts straight. I'm just not able to confirm it for myself, and I don't really bother keeping up with celebrity gossip. All I know is that she used to be married once upon a time and then got married again.
This is one of the stupidest, asinine, and ridiculous things I have ever read. Only a weak man would think anything here is correct or true.
I think the man who wrote it and those who agree are the real pussies in this situation.
There is nothing more to say about it.
Then goodbye and good luck.