When our friend Terrence Popp came up with the Coitus Consent Form, it was supposed to be a bit of dark humour poking fun at the campus rape culture hysteria that was (and still is) raging out of control. It was not, at the time at least, supposed to be taken too seriously- though of course if you really want to get a feminist into bed (and God help you if you do) then you might at least consider getting her to sign one. As we know, now, nobody levels false rape accusations faster or more frequently than feminist swamp donkeys.

Evidently Popp’s crystal ball is rather more accurate than any of us might like to admit:

The left-wing Swedish governing coalition is looking to drastically tighten the country’s sexual consent laws which will require prior verbal or written consent from both partners in the near future.

The government has said the new laws, which will go into effect in July of next year, will require both partners to have explicit verbal or written consent in order to engage in sexual activity, or be open to potential rape charges Die Welt reports.

Previously Swedish law stated that sexual relations were deemed consensual as long as neither partner said “no” except in cases of extreme intoxication. The new legislation claims to only require oral permission beforehand but many have speculated that in a potential rape allegation it would be wiser to have the permission written down on paper.

Social Democratic Prime Minister Stefan Löfven defended the new legislation on Sunday saying, “The message is simple. You need to ask the person you want to have sex about if she wants it. If you are unsure, you have to leave it. Sex must be voluntary.”

The law is said to be inspired by the #MeToo campaign which has seen several prominent media organisations and even the far-left activist group Expo, rocked by sexual misconduct allegations.

I don’t suppose that this could possibly have anything to do with, oh I dunno, the fact that the Swedes very stupidly imported tens of thousands of “refugees” from the Levant who have absolutely no regard whatsoever for Western norms concerning personal boundaries and female consent when it comes to sex?

But no, we cannot say such a thing about our little brown brothers from the East! No, the problem is not the fact that nearly 100% of rape cases in Sweden are attributable to migrants from Muslim nations; the problem is men in general!

And clearly, the solution, according to our liberal friends, is to ask a woman to sign a mutually binding contract of consent that will allow a man to stick it in crazy.

Imagine what dating in Sweden will become if this law becomes reality. Actually, let’s run through a little thought experiment on the subject, just for shits and lots of giggles.

Let’s say things are going well, the chemistry is good, she’s giving off all of the right signals, she’s laughing at your stupid jokes and silly stories, you’re talking to her with a good cocky-funny attitude and proper ZFG game. You’ve escalated correctly with good kino and strong frame, you’ve made out with her for a bit, and she’s clearly interested in taking things further.

You tell her that the two of you should get out of whatever bar or club you’re in- never a restaurant, shitlords don’t do restaurant first or second dates, after all- and head over to your apartment, which is “close by”. You get her to your place, things get hot and heavy, and it’s clear that you’re going to be able to “seal the deal”.

(Yes, I know, I sound like an overly spergy PUA forum lurker. I don’t make the rules of the Game, I simply observe them for what they are.)

And then, just before you start doing the horizontal tango, right before you get to make the beast with two backs, as you wait to plough her field- you whip out a Coitus Consent Form, in triplicate, for her to sign, with a red pen no less. You may also at this point present her with an Objects of Use Addendum, and- for those of you so inclined to go for such things- an S&M Addendum.

You might also want to keep a Bible handy by your bedside for her to swear on as she fills out the necessary paperwork. And of course you’ll want it filmed for posterity- no, not film her posterior, you silly bastard (though it might not be such a bad idea), filmed for EVIDENCE.

Because, as we men all know by now, if there is one thing you can count on a thot to do these days, it is to lie and dissemble about what she did and who she did it with if she feels like she can get any kind of benefit out of it. And because of their inherent pussy pass, they get away with lies and manipulation far more easily than men do.

From a man’s point of view, that seems like an awful lot of work to do just to get some strange.

And although I cannot speak for women, I would imagine that this sort of thing would kill the mood deader than a dry dogfish in a very big hurry. Though, I dunno, maybe some girls get turned on by paperwork- I’ve never met any, but who knows, they might exist.

Ladies- not that any of you are reading this, of course, and if you are I’m sure your heads have exploded by now- tell me in the comments section below whether that sort of thing gets your motor running.

Oh, and one more thing: I don’t know if the Swedish government has figured this out yet, but by insisting on a contractual document that both parties have to sign in order to permit men to have sex with women, they essentially went and turned dating into legalised prostitution.

Which, if you think about it, is kind of what dating and especially marriage these days in the West generally is.

Y’know, somehow I don’t think the Swedes really thought this one through all the way.

There is actually a serious point to be made here about how ridiculous it is that sexual relations in advanced Western societies have gotten to the point where forms have to be filled in for men and women to do what comes most naturally to us. Sex is supposed to be a fun, pleasurable act that has a serious reproductive purpose. It was never supposed to be turned into this dry, cold, impersonal act of rubbing genitalia together with written consent by both parties.

Men need sex. Women provide sex. Men have resources. Women need resources. In a healthy, functioning, civilised society- and I’m generalising a lot here, I know- men trade resources for sex. Both parties end up happy. Along the way, babies get made and civilisation gets passed down to them.

That is how it is supposed to work, and that is how things did work for millennia without the need for all sorts of silly paperwork and paraphernalia needed to support the system.

In the old days, if you were a woman and you had sex out of wedlock, the consequences tended to be pretty severe. If you were a man and you did the same, then things were not usually too bad, except that you generally got stuck taking care of any bastards born as a result of your indiscretions. (I am well aware that there were plenty of exceptions to this general rule, especially among the aristocratic elite.)

These self-reinforcing mechanisms helped keep female monkey-branching in check, and helped men think with their big heads instead of their little ones a bit more clearly.

Nowadays, of course, we no longer live in a sustainable or sensible Western civilisation. We live instead in the crumbling ruins of one that insists that “do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law”.

And when that same decaying pretense of a civilisation insists on importing tens of thousands of men who come from societies and nations where “the law” states very clearly that women are inferior and are the property of men, then the inevitable end result is sexual market dysfunction and complete and total chaos, to the detriment of men and especially women everywhere.

Somewhere up there, the good Lord is shaking His head at us. He has a sense of humour, to be sure, but I somehow doubt that He finds even this to be all that funny.