Longtime reader Dire Badger tried out an interesting experiment with respect to search engines in response to my recent post about the follies of outsourcing work to India:

You were right about Yandex. My Russian is not great (5 years of Russian in School taught me how to ask for the bathroom and how to get in a fight) but as a test, I typed in ‘Sexy Girl’ on it, google, and duckduckgo.

Google was sickening. There were children dressed in lingerie, furries, Whales, CG, Auschwitz survivors, trannies, ugly negroes and angry dykes.

DuckDuckGo was marginally better. No kids, few whales and starvation cases, no CG for a few pages.

Yandex. How can I put this? Check it yourself. I was greeted with a long list of girls that would look right at home here on Fridays… in fact, a lot of them were above your minimum cutoff. Definitely ‘sexy girls’ (turn safesearch on) but no blatant porn, no weird cosplayers or trannies, no hogs or skeletons… Of course, the fact that every one of them was Eastern European was a huge plus. 18000 hits.

I replicated this experiment under controlled conditions using Brave Browser in an incognito window with my IP address masked using NordVPN. I can largely confirm DB’s findings – with a couple of caveats.

First, you must set DDG’s SafeSearch to “Moderate”. If you switch it to “Off”… well, go back to the post that I wrote a few days ago about the extreme dangers of pr0n, and pay close attention to it, because you’re going to get inundated with that shit.

I don’t believe that this is due to any serious degeneracy on the part of the creators of DuckDuckGo. I have used DDG as my primary search engine for well over three years at this point, and I have generally found that it treats you like an adult. If you switch off SafeSearch, that’s on you, and you have to accept the consequences of doing that.

(Longtime reader, friend, and fellow shitlord Last Redoubt once asked me where I get my pictures of girls with guns for my Monday segments. They are terrific, no question. The answer is that I just run a search in DuckDuckGo with SafeSearch = Off and then pick and choose the sexiest but still safe for work pictures. It’s really that simple, but boy is it effective. For those of you interested in a blog that caters specifically to guys who like looking at pictures of hot girls with big guns, here’s one.)

Second, I didn’t see all of the weird shit that Dire Badger saw in his Google search, until I switched over the region setting to the USA. This tells me that Google self-censors its own search results based on the region of the world that you are in.

If you select a region in Asia, for instance, children will not turn up in your search results for the term above – and, seriously, thank God for that. You also won’t get quite as much computer-generated garbage. DuckDuckGo’s image search doesn’t generate results of little girls in bikinis in either case, which tells me that they’ve got some serious filters built into their algorithms to begin with.

Third, yes, Yandex.ru really does give you INCREDIBLE results. Most of them are indeed Eastern European women. And not all of them are pr0n actresses; the vast majority of them aren’t even nude. What can I say – the Russkies know how to give a man what he wants without poisoning his mind.

In future I will definitely be using Yandex for random hot girl image searches for the Friday segments. The Russians obviously have a real eye for beauty – though, of course, if you have ever spent any time with their women, then you will know this already.

But all of this mucking about with search engines piqued my curiosity. I wondered what would happen if I did another experiment by running a search through four or five top-ranked search engines for a specific term guaranteed to dump half a hundredweight of hot mustard straight into the shorts of any SJW loon employed at Google or any other search company.

So I fired up another Incognito window, kickstarted my VPN, and opened up tabs for DuckDuckGo, Google, Yahoo!, Bing, and Yandex.

And I decided to do a search for…

“White couple”.

The sound you just heard? That’s the epic sound of SJW heads exploding. It looks like this:

I do love that movie. I actually had something of a minor disagreement with our beloved and dreaded Supreme Dark Lord (PBUH) on the subject of Kingsman recently; he thinks that the film’s church massacre scene is pure Satanic inversion, and that the movie itself is full of Hollyweird degeneracy, whereas I think it is one of the best action-comedies ever made and is nothing but a straight-up middle finger to the entire globohomo Establishment. Take a look at the link, watch the Darkstream in full, read my comment and his response, and decide for yourself.

Back on topic – here are the results by search engine for the term that I searched for. Note that with DuckDuckGo, I left the default SafeSearch setting at “Moderate”, which is what it reverts to when you open up an Incognito window on any device or platform. I didn’t bother with the SafeSearch settings for any of the other engines.

Here are the results from DuckDuckGo:

Right, so we have thirty-one results in that screen capture – I only got the first four rows, but that’s a decent enough sample set. Of these, you have 21 interracial couples (although one photo there has 3 couples in it) and two homosexual ones. Two more of those photos are of a white couple that thinks they are black. At least three of the remainder feature a man whose ethnicity is questionable and who may or may not be white.

So you have 19 photos of interracial couples – remember that one of those photos has three couples in it, and Kevin James’s wife is Hispanic – and 2 with faggots, and 2 with complete lunatics.

That leaves just eight images of genuinely white couples. And of those, two have a man of questionable ethnicity and two have either a mystery-meat or black kid in them.

You are left with just five images of genuinely white couples, from a search that specifically asks for white couples. That amounts to only 16% accuracy with easily the best non-Google search engine out there today.

And, in fact, you could quite reasonably whittle that down by two, because two of the photos in the top row consist of a dark-haired man with olive skin and a woman of similar complexion, so they could easily be (((Levantines))). In that event, the hit rate is ten percent.

This is downright weird. We have good reason to think that DDG is not nearly as SJW-converged as Google is, which is almost completely run by swivel-eyed SJW crazies at this point – it’s something of a miracle, in fact, that Blogger has not been completely subsumed by the screeching purple-haired landwhales running around imposing Stalinist thoughtcrime rules over the rest of the organisation.

In fact, let’s take a look at the Google results to do a comparison:

This screenshot has 30 images in it, but if anything, the results are even worse. Google’s image results show composites of other images as well as its own image filters, so it is a little hard to see what is going on, but there are precisely four images of true white couples here. And one of them is about a white couple and an Asian baby.

There are just two images of an unquestionably white couple. That is a 6.7% accuracy rate.

You’d kind of expect a lot of nonsense from the SJW tech-overlords at Google, but even someone as cynical as me might be surprised to see just how deep the rot is.

Now let’s take a look at Bing, which I expect to be every bit as bad as Google:

This is a much smaller sample set – only 21 images. There is obviously a lot of overlap between the various search engines, as Bing’s results show identical results to several of DDG’s. There are maybe four images that show absolutely, unambiguously white couples. That’s actually a bit better than DDG managed, and way better than Google did – but the people in one of those pictures look like teenagers, which strikes me as quite odd.

So Bing returns at most 3 genuine white couples that are of reasonable age. That is a 14% or so hit rate.

The funniest one, by far, is Yahoo!. Watch what happens when you try to run a search for “white couple”:

Zip. Zilch. Nada. Nichts. Rien. Bupkess. Ничего. 何もない. 没有.

But wait, it gets funnier still. Watch what happens when you try to search for “white MARRIED couple“:

“Your query contains some restricted word(s)”. You’ll have to excuse me while I reinsert the lung that I just coughed up from laughing so hard.

Apparently, Yahoo!, whose search engine is actually powered by Microsoft’s Bing these days, can’t find any images for “white couple”, at all, even though Bing can. And the moment you try to look for “white married couple”, it slaps you upside the head with a cease-and-desist letter.

However – if you change your region settings to the USA, then suddenly Yahoo! wakes up and starts working:

And, as you can see, it’s every bit as converged and ridiculous as what you get out of both DDG and Google. Out of 27 images, just three feature a genuinely white man and woman without a mystery-meat kid. That’s an 11% accuracy rate – better than Google’s, worse than Bing’s and DDG’s.

The only reason why it isn’t the same as Bing’s rate is because Bing displays fewer results per page due to the way that the output images are scaled.

All I can say is that this is what happens when you put a woman in charge – and not just any woman, but the woman who used to boink the CEO of Google, no less, and was responsible for several major failures within Google itself due to her extremely annoying micromanagement which she carried over to Yahoo!, and threw billions of dollars of perfectly good money away on stupid vanity projects.

Anyway, enough dogpiling onto Yahoo!, let’s see what the Russkies can come up with. Here are the results from a Yandex image search:

Huh. Well lookee what we have here.

Thirty-one images, same as DDG. Not one single faggot in sight.

We still have a problem here, obviously. Of the thirty-one images on display, I see only 7 in which the couples can be said to be white with high levels of confidence. In the bottom right there is one girl whose face is obscured because she has it buried in her man’s neck, and the third photo from the left in the third row shows what I think is a white girl, but it’s hard to tell given that it’s a black-and-white photo.

But overall, the levels of globohomo propaganda are greatly reduced. We’re talking about a 22.6% hit rate.

That still isn’t anything great. But it’s a hell of a lot better than 6.7%. And it’s the best accuracy rate by miles.

So what conclusions can we draw from this?

First: It would appear that the American-based search engines share a lot of features in their algorithms.

I actually know a little – VERY little – about the mathematics behind search algorithms. Mathematically speaking, it depends on clustering analysis and group theory. Given the fact that DDG, Google, and Bing all share a number of items in common, a purely mathematical search algorithm would likely return those same images.

This leads us clearly to the second point which is…

Second: The results returned strongly indicate that there is a disproportionate effect from social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter on the image results returned from a search.

I don’t have the time or ability to do a detailed analysis here, but my guess is that these algorithms look for explicit hashtags on publicly available social media photos and also at the most popular news and image sites in the world, and collect images based on popularity – however that happens to be measured. And that popularity is heavily influenced by weights given by social media platforms.

That implies that there is a very strong argument for breaking up the social media monopolies, as they are very clearly skewing the search results for what should be an unambiguous set of terms and pushing some serious globohomo bullshit on all of us.

Third: If you were to do a similar search for “black couple” on all of the search engines that I mentioned above, here is what you get.

So clearly Yahoo! is by far the most SJW-converged bullshit company out of the bunch, and you are well advised never to use it for anything, including email.

(Note – again, you can force it to work by changing the region settings. But, why would you want to use Yahoo! search in the first place?)

But look at the results from the rest. There is not even a single mixed race couple in any of them. Very curious indeed.

Now, I know the Russians to be a generally tolerant people, but they look askance, to say the least, on mixed-race couples as a general rule. They don’t much care for the idea, at least in the abstract. In practical terms you will generally find that they are fairly open-minded about such things – speaking from personal experience there. But it is clear to me that Yandex’s boffins haven’t messed around much, if at all, with the results from these searches with any significant manual intervention.

So clearly it is not just Google’s evil that is driving these wonky search results. There is more going on here.

You might be tempted to think that there is some sort of global conspiracy to make us see a lot of propaganda about how being white is evil and wrong and so on. Almost as if this world is ruled by a truly terrible evil power that wants to see us all mentally and eventually physically enslaved…

But that would be ridiculous… Right? Right?!?

I should make it clear at this point that I don’t have anything against mixed-race couples personally. I am the product of one.

I have dated white women in their own countries, and I have never experienced even a moment of racism or pushback for doing so.

I also don’t have anything against white people personally. In fact, I quite like white folks. In my experience, whites are actually the most tolerant, least racist, and by far the kindest and most decent people anywhere on Earth.

I simply believe that there is nothing wrong with being white. I don’t think that white people should be ashamed of their skin colour and have nothing to apologise for these days, especially when compared to the ways in which other races treat those with different mental programming or skin colours.

If you don’t believe me, try being a black person in China. The Chinese are easily the most racist, xenophobic, and downright nasty people on Earth when it comes to race. Here’s an example of what I’m talking about:

Imagine if Procter & Gamble had made that ad about Tide laundry powder. Their corporate headquarters in Cincinnati would have been firebombed by hordes of unwashed Pantifags and burned to the ground the very next day.

(Personally I thought that ad was both really racist and really funny, but that’s because I have an actual sense of humour and can laugh even at things that the fainting-couch types find wildly offensive.)

It is becoming very clear to anyone paying even a modicum of attention that we are under relentless psychological attack – and white people in particular are under truly deadly assault. They are being attacked constantly simply for the “sin” of being white.

It is almost enough to turn the average Chad into a white nationalist – never mind that the entire concept of white nationalism is absurd and illogical. I’m just saying that the impulse is quite understandable; you can only push white people so far before they start reacting.

And judging by this little experiment that I conducted earlier, I’d say that the reactions are going to be appallingly brutal. It won’t be much longer before the fault lines in Western society reach breaking point.