“We are Forerunners. Guardians of all that exists. The roots of the Galaxy have grown deep under our careful tending. Where there is life, the wisdom of our countless generations has saturated the soil. Our strength is a luminous sun, towards which all intelligence blossoms… And the impervious shelter, beneath which it has prospered.”

Friday T&A: Outfoxed Edition

by | Apr 23, 2021 | fat girl jihad | 11 comments

Y’know, when the Fake President and his Fake Administration took office, it came as a huge shock to many of us on the Hard Right – and it was a huge blow to our morale as well. But even the most pessimistic of us probably did not expect that things would go so pear-shaped, so quickly.

The Fake President is nothing more than a construct of the traitorous (((media)))))). We all know that. But the level of mendacity and treachery of the never-to-be-sufficiently-cursed whorenalists and presstitutes is breathtaking to behold nowadays. They don’t even PRETEND to be honest anymore, which is in and of itself a sort of honesty, but the problem is that they switch that on and off at will.

And their biggest lie, by far, which they tried to sell repeatedly to the American public, was that Sleepy Creepy Slow Uncle Joe was nothing more than a continuation of Barack Hussein Odumbass’s term as President. Quite why anyone would want another lying Globohomo type in office, doing Globohomo things, is of course one of those sticky issues that the (((media))))) never wanted to explain to anyone.

After all, it was under Obama that the US economy slowed down to a crawl. And it was under Obama that the American Empire truly began to fracture and disintegrate. It was Obama’s weakness and indecision, and his lack of transparency, and his lack of decency, and his outright contempt for the American people, that led to the current environment of extreme racial tensions and hatred.

Indeed, it was the entire Washingtoonian Swamp that created a toxic blend of elements that have now pitted Americans against each other, in ways that the country has not seen since the War Between the States.

Now that I’m outside of the USSA, I actually have a hard time explaining what has happened to other people. Foreigners, especially Eastern Europeans, still have this vision of America as this land of golden dreams and opportunities, but they can see and sense that something has gone horribly wrong. Yet, it takes a long time to strip people of their illusions when they don’t have daily contact with realities on the ground.

I had that exact experience recently when a lady from Russia sent me a compilation of clips from people driving through inner cities in America. She was shocked at how squalid and dirty the cities looked. I pointed out to her that the video showed people driving through majority-Black, highly “diverse”, and Daemoncrat-controlled cities. She couldn’t believe that America, the greatest and freest country on Earth – or so the citizens of the FSU used to think – would allow their country to become so miserable and degraded.

And so I had to tell her that this was, and is, the reality of life in urban America these days.

This is what happens when a civilisation loses confidence in itself and collapses. The FSU nations saw it happen 30 years ago, and they witnessed a full decade of terrible suffering and strife from it. But their core culture and values never disappeared, and they came back stronger and better than ever. They rebuilt themselves and reworked their countries. And now they are MORE free, MORE liberal, and MORE civilised than anything that their Western counterparts can come up with.

You think I’m joking? Go to Moscow – well, you can’t, right now, but you will be able to later in the summer – and take a walk through the city. People there are FREE. They don’t have to wear masks on the metro. They can eat indoors and spend time in clubs and go to the gym and assemble with their friends. The Russians are FREE to do everything other than strongly criticise their own government.

Westerners might scoff at this and claim that this makes Russians less free than they are. Tell that to the Germans, whose government just passed a bill requiring state-mandated lockdowns and draconian measures to curb the spread of a not-particularly-dangerous disease. Tell that to Americans, especially Whites, who cannot criticise Blacks without facing immediate censure, and who no longer have any voice whatsoever in the way that they are governed.

Tell that to Brits, who have an agonisingly slow wait until their country is finally free, even though deaths and hospitalisations from the Chinese Mumps have absolutely plummeted over the past month.

And tell that to the Aussies and Kiwis, who live now in a police state without any freedoms that their government does not condescend to give them.

You call that “freedom”?!? If so, then y’all might as well adopt Big Brother’s slogans:

War is Peace
Freedom is Slavery
Ignorance is Strength

It’s enough to make a man despair of any hope in the future.

And yet… hope remains, even so. As I pointed out in yesterday’s post, as long as we stand firm and build each other up, they can NEVER take away our freedoms, not really, no matter how many Fake Presidents come along. What you are experiencing right now is a very deliberate, very carefully planned, and very effective campaign of demoralisation and degradation, intended specifically to make you give up hope.

It will only work if you let it. Don’t give up, and don’t back down. This broken and corrupted world is long overdue for a serious collapse and correction, and that WILL come. All you can do is prepare for that event as best as you can. And when the time comes, be hopeful that we will live to see better, greener, and freer days.

Do not lose faith in yourself. Do not lose faith in your brothers. And above all, do not lose faith in Him Above.

With that in mind, let’s get to today’s morale-boosting shot – or rather, Instathot.

Her name is Charlotte Elise Fox, age 23, from Manchester, deep in the north of PommieBastardLande. She is known for… um… er… well, I’m not sure anybody knows, but in her homeland, it’s not that hard to become famous. Women can do it easily enough, simply by signing up for some trashy realitard TV show called Love Island, which apparently involves a lot of fit young men and women bonking their way through several weeks somewhere.

Look, I don’t watch realitard TV – indeed, i find most “popular” things intolerable – but I’m just saying that it’s not that hard to be famous in the UK. You simply need to be a big enough sloot, or douche, and you’ll get there in a big hurry.

That should tell you everything you need to know about the absolute state of BritBongLand, really.

That aside – happy Friday, gents. Enjoy your weekend and get some good rest, because, remember – the ride never ends.

Subscribe to Didactic Mind

* indicates required
Email Format

Recent Thoughts

If you enjoyed this article, please:

  • Visit the Support page and check out the ways to support my work through purchases and affiliate links;
  • Email me and connect directly;
  • Share this article via social media;

11 Comments

  1. Johnny

    Didact,

    What are you on HBD correlations? The WNs on places like Unz Review take it too far, but I can’t deny that the hierarchy of racial intelligence and female attractiveness are about the same.

    Whites
    East Asians
    Light brown types
    Dark brown types like Indians
    African blacks

    The above happens to be the hierarchy of prosperity of created societies of each race, and thus of racial IQ. But that is also the ranking (arguably) of the attractiveness of women of each race. The male ranking is perhaps different, but looks are a much smaller factor in determining male SMV anyway.

    It would make sense that the higher-ranking genetics would be seen as more attractive by men viewing women of each race.

    White societies are the best AND white women are (or at least were) the prettiest.
    Blacks are the bottom on both metrics.
    South Asians are the second lowest on both metrics.

    …and so forth.

    How tight do you think this correlation is, and does it validate core truths about HBD?

    Reply
    • Didact

      It’s an intriguing question. I’ve answered it before in some detail. The short version is that I do think there is some correlation between the two, but if I had to guess about the “R-squared”, as it were, then that would be challenging given the highly subjective nature of female beauty. That said, I would estimate it to be roughly +60% – i.e. overall female beauty increases with overall societal and cultural IQ.

      As for the “core truths about HBD” – I’m not overly familiar with the theory, so I can’t really say. My understanding of it is that its proponents argue that IQ is the major determinant of outcomes. I am warmly receptive to the notion, but I think there is a lot more to it than that. One of HBD’s critics once wrote on The Unz Review about how HBD fails to predict the relative outperformance of Chadean immigrant children at UK state comprehensive schools, for instance.

      The way I see it, IQ is nothing more than an indication of potential – as I’ve said before, having an IQ of 170 is a lot like a Bugatti Chiron’s ability to produce 1,500bhp from its quad-turbo W16 engine. Yeah, it has the POTENTIAL to rip your face off, but most of the time, drivers use perhaps 10% of that total capacity to just pootle along and pose in Times Square. (Seen it happen.) Same story with IQ – it’s all about how you use it.

      Reply
      • Johnny

        OK, if the looks of a race’s women, and the IQ of the race have at least a 60% (I say 80%) correlation, then we have something.

        What is Cultural IQ? Pls elaborate. I do agree that the looks of Western white women peaked in the 1990s, after which the fat blue-haired phenomena seems to have become more frequent. Eastern Europe might currently be where the US was in the 1990s, and it will go downhill from here due to the spread of feminist/woke cancer.

        The Chadean immigrant point has too little data. Far more interesting is the huge outperformance of Indian-Americans in the US, which is across a much larger data pool. Unlike the WNs who want to oversimplify thing, I know better than to conflate ‘caste’, ‘IQ’, and ‘Caucasian fraction’ with each other. The Indians in the US are not necessarily the descendants of the highest-IQ Indians in India. Above average, yes, but not the top 1% by any stretch.

        Also, the high-IQ fraction of India doesn’t seem to produce vastly better looking women. But I have noticed that Indian women born in the West are better looking just on account of being outside of the toxicity (chemical, biological, psychological) of India. The average Western-born Indian woman is probably 85th percentile among wealthy Indian women in India.

        Honestly, I never found Aishwarya Rai to be that hot, particularly when compared to women outside of India. Her face was round and cherubic, and her body was not tight. If she were to wear a swimsuit in her prime, I doubt she would qualify for even your weekly Friday T&A series. In fact, is there any Indian woman, born in India, who has a swimsuit-worthy body? I don’t doubt that 2nd or 3rd gen Indian women in the West can occasionally produce a woman who qualifies.

        Reply
        • Didact

          OK, if the looks of a race’s women, and the IQ of the race have at least a 60% (I say 80%) correlation, then we have something.

          Well yeah, but that’s just my rough guess, it’s not worth any more than that.

          Surprisingly, there has actually been some research done into this field. The data from that one study show that intelligence correlates more strongly with physical attractiveness than any other variable, but the average correlation is actually fairly small (though significant). It ranges somewhere between 12% and 60%, depending on the sample set.

          What is Cultural IQ? Pls elaborate.

          Essentially, it is the overall level of intelligence of the culture itself. This is obviously subjective – while IQ is objective, there are a number of cultural practices even in high-IQ cultures that are downright repellent to other cultures. But a good measure of “cultural IQ” is probably whether or not certain traits contribute to long-term survival of that culture.

          Consider: the Han Chinese are, on average, the most intelligent people in the world. But they have a decided preference for sons over daughters and their population pyramid reflects this fact. This is a culturally stupid practice that has already caused a massive demographic imbalance in their country. White Europeans do not have this problem. They have OTHER problems, but not one that puts the long-term survival of their culture at serious risk.

          Far more interesting is the huge outperformance of Indian-Americans in the US, which is across a much larger data pool.

          Yeah, but remember that those outperformance statistics are heavily skewed. For every Indian or Pakistani doctor, tech entrepreneur, or neurosurgeon, making 6 figures, there are many more taxi drivers and 7-11 managers pulling minimum wage.

          The major trait that most Indians have in common is a cultural one, and that is an immense respect for education. And that is cultural in nature. The Hindu caste system is abominable in many ways, but it has inculcated a deep respect for book knowledge into the people. (This is both for better and worse – we both know that book-smart types are some of the dumbest people around in reality.) This is why Indians come to the West and work dead-end menial jobs to save up and give their children the best possible educations. And that education then propels their children into high-performance careers and social outcomes. They then tend to associate with others like them, thereby creating a closed-loop system in which they associate with high-performance types and lock out anyone else who isn’t “like them”.

          This is why Indian-Americans tend to hire other Indians, at the expense of Blacks, Whites, Jews, and Chinese. And everyone else, with the conspicuous exception of Whites, returns the favour.

          I have noticed that Indian women born in the West are better looking just on account of being outside of the toxicity (chemical, biological, psychological) of India. The average Western-born Indian woman is probably 85th percentile among wealthy Indian women in India.

          That’s true. I said as much in that piece from years ago that got me started on this whole topic.

          In fact, is there any Indian woman, born in India, who has a swimsuit-worthy body?

          If there is, I haven’t found her on Instaham yet. And I certainly won’t go out of my way to look for one.

          Reply
          • Johnny

            Yeah, but remember that those outperformance statistics are heavily skewed. For every Indian or Pakistani doctor, tech entrepreneur, or neurosurgeon, making 6 figures, there are many more taxi drivers and 7-11 managers pulling minimum wage.

            But given the high average income of Indian-Americans, there actually aren’t that many minimum wage workers pulling down. Indian-Americans have the highest average income of any national-categorized ethnicity in the US. Hence, the ratio of high earners to low earners is high.

            That doesn’t mean they are a good immigrant group for the US, of course, despite that.

            And that is cultural in nature. The Hindu caste system is abominable in many ways, but it has inculcated a deep respect for book knowledge into the people.

            So then why does India still have an illiteracy problem? If what you say is true, illiteracy in India should have ended long ago. Volunteers who teach rural children should number in the millions. That point does not add up.

            This is why Indian-Americans tend to hire other Indians, at the expense of Blacks, Whites, Jews, and Chinese.

            I suspect that Indians hire other Indians because they are more confident of being able to cheat/defraud fellow Indians than other groups. So the Indians being hired are not beneficiaries of anything fortunate. They are just being herded as marks. Non-Indians should not complain of Indians in tech hiring other Indians, for this reason. Who wants to be cheated?

            If there is, I haven’t found her on Instaham yet.

            There probably isn’t one. But I will say that that Sunny Leone person has a better body than Aishwarya Rai. Partly because the former was born and raised in India.

  2. Johnny

    *What are your thoughts on HBD correlations?

    Reply
    • Didact

      But given the high average income of Indian-Americans, there actually aren’t that many minimum wage workers pulling down. Indian-Americans have the highest average income of any national-categorized ethnicity in the US. Hence, the ratio of high earners to low earners is high.

      No, that’s not true at all. The average income is very high, but the median income is actually not that much higher than the median for Whites. See here for details.

      In statistical terms, this means that there is a small number of very high performers that massively skew the distribution of incomes toward the right. This squares with anecdotal evidence. You’ll see a number of exceptionally wealthy Indians in Silicon Valley, Wall Street, and Georgetown, for sure. But then, if you go to Jamaica or Jackson Heights, you’ll see how the average Indian or Pakistani immigrant to the USA lives. And it’s really not very much better than the average White – indeed, in many ways it is considerably worse. I’ve seen this myself, time and again, both in the UK and the USA.

      So then why does India still have an illiteracy problem? If what you say is true, illiteracy in India should have ended long ago.

      That’s very easy. Suppose you live in a feudal society of strict caste divisions, in which the people who read and write and know the Scriptures of your people are considered holy and superior. In that system, knowledge is, quite literally, power. And as you will know from daily experience, those who have power, do not wish to share it.

      That is precisely what happened in India. The Brahmins exploited their position for centuries by inventing ever more arcane rituals to cement their positions as the leaders of their societies. They preserved their knowledge and refused to share it, and refused to permit intermarriage between themselves and lower castes. That is why archaeogenetics shows such a substantial freeze in Indian genetic history for 1,500 years.

      The Brahmins refused to teach others how to read and write. It is in fact thanks to the British that literacy in India went from like 3% when they arrived, to about 11% when they left. And the secular government of India has spent decades trying to break the power of the Brahmins over the educational systems there – with, I might add, considerable success.

      I suspect that Indians hire other Indians because they are more confident of being able to cheat/defraud fellow Indians than other groups. So the Indians being hired are not beneficiaries of anything fortunate.

      Partly, but it’s also due to stark racial and ethnic preferences. In fact, Indians hire lower-caste Indians from the old country to come and work in the States, and in return, they expect kickbacks from their lower-caste employees as “compensation” for bringing them over to enjoy the good life in America. That is also a normal part of Indian culture.

      Make no mistake, though, Indians are massive racists. They’re not as bad as the Chinese or many Jews, but they’re probably #2 or a very close #3 on the list of the most racist groups of people on the planet. And, as I’ve said many times, European Whites are the least racist, by a huge margin.

      Reply
  3. Johnny

    This is a far better source of Median Household Income (American Community Survey). Indian-Americans (from India) are the top, even with median :

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_ethnic_groups_in_the_United_States_by_household_income

    Indians originating from India are a clear 33% above the next highest (Taiwanese Americans) and a full twice as high as whites.

    Your source only speaks of ‘Asians’ in aggregate. It does not mention East Indians at all.

    (I hope you know that the term ‘American Indian’ in your link refers to Native Americans, or what you might call ‘Red Indians’).

    And, as I’ve said many times, European Whites are the least racist, by a huge margin.

    American and Canadian whites, yes. Don’t be so sure about Europe (and Australia, for that matter).

    Reply
    • Didact

      Indians originating from India are a clear 33% above the next highest (Taiwanese Americans) and a full twice as high as whites.

      OK. I stand corrected, then.

      (I hope you know that the term ‘American Indian’ in your link refers to Native Americans, or what you might call ‘Red Indians’).

      You seriously think that I spent over a decade living in the USA and DON’T know the difference between a dot-Indian and a feather-Indian?

      American and Canadian whites, yes. Don’t be so sure about Europe (and Australia, for that matter).

      I’ve lived in both. My statement stands.

      Reply
  4. Johnny

    You seriously think that I spent over a decade living in the USA and DON’T know the difference between a dot-Indian and a feather-Indian?

    I would have assumed so since virtually everybody knows the difference, but the link you included makes no mention of Asian Indians separated from ‘Asians’ in total, but discusses ‘American Indians’ at length. So if it was just a matter of not looking at your own link, then that is what it is.

    So then..

    The exceptional economic success of Indians in the US, can be attributed to what? I don’t buy that these are drawn from the Top 1% of Indians in India. Top 20% certainly, but they aren’t the elites of India. Nor are they all ‘Brahmins’ or whatever, since only half are even Hindu, as per the wikipedia page.

    Reply
    • Didact

      The exceptional economic success of Indians in the US, can be attributed to what? I don’t buy that these are drawn from the Top 1% of Indians in India. Top 20% certainly, but they aren’t the elites of India. Nor are they all ‘Brahmins’ or whatever, since only half are even Hindu, as per the wikipedia page.

      A significant part of it is unquestionably tribalism. Make no mistake, Indians hire Indians just as Jews hire Jews and Chinese hire Chinese. There is a well-documented system of kickbacks for Indian managers who hire Indian H-1Bs, effectively turning new hires into wage-slaves locked into contracts or jobs.

      Another part of it has to do with the fact that, in India, if you aren’t a doctor, lawyer, accountant, or engineer, you basically aren’t shit, according to most middle-class Indians and their rather parochial way of thinking. This naturally makes Indians gravitate toward those fields, all of which require at least average IQs and usually better than that. These are also high-paying fields in the West. So Indians who come “over there” end up taking over large parts of those professions. And then, rather inevitably, the tribalism kicks in.

      I have no doubt that if you were to run IQ tests on the Asian-American population in the USA, you would find a statistically very significant proportion of high performers. But I do not believe that it amounts to a full standard deviation difference in intelligence, like that silly fake statistic about how Ashkenazi Jews in the USA have an average IQ of 115, which supposedly in turn explains their systematic outperformance compared to Whites. And I do not believe that to be the case.

      I don’t know if anyone has done any serious research into the issue of Indian-American IQ scores. The closest I could find was this post, which estimates the average IQ of Indian-Americans (i.e. dot-Indians, not feather-Indians) to be about 106.

      That is higher than the White average of 100-103 – but it isn’t THAT much higher. So IQ alone plainly is not the determining factor.

      This points yet again to tribalistic tendencies – which Indians exhibit very strongly. Some substrates of Indians are every bit as bad as Jews and Chinese – the Parsees (i.e. Indians whose ancestors originated from ancient Persia) are notorious for this, as are the Marwaris (from Gujarat), even in India itself.

      Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Didactic Mind Archives

Didactic Mind by Category

%d bloggers like this: