Chaps, remember when, as our friend 1st Sgt Terrence Popp (USArmy, Ret) put it in a truly hilarious video from very nearly a year ago, “Jeff Bezos lost half his pesos“?

Turns out that his phone got hacked after he got a “malicious message” from the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia, Mohammad bin Salman:

Jeff Bezos’ cell phone was hacked in 2018 after he received a malicious WhatsApp message from the crown prince of Saudi Arabia, months before the National Enquirer exposed his affair, it has been claimed.

The Amazon billionaire received a video file containing malicious code from Mohammed Bin Salman’s personal phone number, The Guardian reported on Tuesday.

According to forensic examination of the phone afterwards, the message was sent on May 1, 2018. Within hours, a large amount of data from Bezos’ phone was extracted. There is no detail of what kind of data was taken.

Eight months later, the National Enquirer exposed Bezos’ affair with Lauren Sanchez, and Bezos accused the tabloid of ‘extortion and blackmail’ for threatening to publish nude photos of himself and Sanchez that the tabloid had ‘obtained’.

In a blog post at the time, Bezos pointed to the Enquirer‘s alleged financial ties to Saudi Arabia, and hinted that the kingdom was furious with him for coverage in the Washington Post, which Bezos owns, about columnist Jamal Khashoggi’s death at the hands of a Saudi hit squad.

There is quite a lot of fun stuff to go into here, but I want to get straight to the most important photo in the article – which is this one, right here:

Holy SHIT. Is there an exorcist in the house? A Catholic priest, perhaps? Heck, just someone with A VIAL OF HOLY WATER?!?!? A ROSARY, SOMEONE – MY KINGDOM FOR A ROSARY!!!

Ahem.

Sorry, chaps. Got a bit carried away there. Staring right at a face that manifests potentially daemonic evil is a genuinely nasty experience.

Seriously, just look at that face. It’s horrifying. If you saw that face staring at you from a podium, you would probably be just as freaked out as if you saw Linda Blair’s face from The Exorcist at the foot of your bed when you woke up in the morning.

Just so we’re clear – Jeff Bezos cheated on his wife with that, and then proceeded to lose TWENTY. BILLION. DOLLARS.

That, right there, is a financial colonic.

The point of this is to show you that it simply does not matter how rich a man is, or how powerful he is, or how many media conglomerates he owns, or how buff and strong he is – a simp WILL BE A SIMP no matter what.

There is no better illustration of this than Jeff Bezosoy.

Born Jeffrey Preston Jorgenson in New Mexico, this was a man who was a true prodigy as a child. He graduated with two Bachelor’s degrees in science from Princeton – one in electrical engineering and another in computer science.

If you don’t know anything about engineering, let me explain this very simply.

Engineers have a distinct pecking order. Civil engineers are the numpties because what they do is boring and easy. Mechanical engineers are the worker bees – they do the bread-and-butter stuff, which is challenging but far from impossible. Chemical and aerospace engineers get a lot of props and respect because they deal with some pretty complex shit.

But when you need serious brainiacs, you go to the electrical and nuclear engineers. Those guys deal with genuinely difficult and complex problems.

Safe to say, then, that Jeff Bezos ain’t no slouch when it comes to brains. I mean, the guy worked for D. E. Shaw – a hedge fund known to be so notoriously selective that they only hire the top 0.001% or thereabouts of talent. That is a company run by nerds, for nerds, with nerds doing all the hard work – and it is REALLY hard work to do what they do.

But all of the brains in the world, all of the great luck and that Lady Fortuna can give a man, all of the muscle and vascularity that comes from a serious workout program – like so:

… all of that, cannot change a simp into an Alpha. Not. Gonna. Happen.

Take a look at MacKenzie Bezos, Mr. Bezosoy’s wife and mother of his children:

I do not wish to be uncharitable to the former Mrs. Bezos. She’s actually not a bad-looking woman at all, though more than a few men (self included) would likely argue that she looks a bit like a boiled horse.

She did, however, give Mr. Bezos four children, and has retained an impressively slim and high-breasted frame despite that. Mr. Bezos clearly married roughly the right woman for his socio-sexual rank at the beginning of his marriage. It was a productive and fruitful union, and both he and his wife did well in their respective roles.

Unfortunately, it is clear that Mr. Bezosoy never quite got around to using his big – VERY big – head instead of his little head.

This is characteristic of simps. They cannot figure out how to control themselves or be happy with what they have.

Another major characteristic is their inability to be truly, brutally honest. This gets them into all sorts of problems.

Here is a video showing a compilation of clips from everyone’s favourite train-wreck of a human interest show, 90 Day Fiancee. I’ve never watched an episode myself, because I don’t watch reality TV. But the ongoing saga of Jorge Nava and Anfisa Whatsitskaya is a source of endless amusement for those of us with any degree of red-pilling whatsoever:

From the viewer’s perspective, a lot of the blame for that dysfunctional relationship falls on Anfisa, and rightly so. She is frankly batshit crazy in a lot of ways.

Here’s the part that the video doesn’t go into, though, and this is something that even a lot of red-pilled men don’t fully understand:

The reason why women go crazy like that is not just because they themselves are nuts – though quite a lot of them are.

No, the real reason why they go crazy like that is because they are absolutely repulsed, at a very fundamental psychological level, by the weakness and neediness of the man that does not put them in their place.

A man who never says no to his woman, never tells her where to get off, never reprimands her when she becomes disrespectful, and never blows his top with his wife or girlfriend when she plainly and visibly oversteps her boundaries, is a man who will never be respected.

A lot of blue-pill Christian types will tell you that the Bible says that a wife should submit to her husband, and that a husband should love his wife and not be harsh with her. That is true. It’s right there in Ephesians 5:29, 1 Corinthians 7:3, and so on.

However, there is one aspect of the Bible that isn’t often discussed, and it comes from right at the beginning.

In most versions of the Bible, right after the Fall, God rebukes Adam and Eve and He tells Eve the following in Genesis 3:16:

Unto the woman He said, “I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception. In sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.”

— King James Version

To the woman he said,
“I will surely multiply your pain in childbearing;
in pain you shall bring forth children.
Your desire shall be contrary to your husband,
but he shall rule over you.”

— English Standard Version

He told the woman,
“I’ll greatly increase the pain of your labor during childbirth.
It will be painful for you to bear children,
“since your trust is turning toward your husband,
and he will dominate you.”

— International Standard Version

Not to belabour (heh) the point here – basically, various versions of the Bible have historically translated this key phrase as stating that a woman shall desire her husband and he will rule over her.

But that is actually a bit of a mistake:

The Hebrew phrase in question does not include a verb and is literally translated “toward your husband your desire.” Since this judgment is predictive, the future tense verb “will be” is added for clarity: “Your desire will be for your husband.” The most basic and straightforward understanding of this verse is that woman and man would now have ongoing conflict. In contrast to the ideal conditions in the Garden of Eden and the harmony between Adam and Eve, their relationship, from that point on, would include a power struggle. The NLT translation makes it more evident: “You will desire to control your husband, but he will rule over you.”

And therein lies the key. As usual, the Bible contains great wisdom that explains far more than an initial reading would reveal.

What a woman really wants is to CONTROL her man – not just desire him, but control him. As painted in the Old Testament, the husband-wife relationship is far more adversarial than the New Testament exposition.

This is not merely philosophical meandering. Look at the results of Anfisa’s total domination over Jorge. His literal job as her husband is to rule over his wife, to keep her in line and to forcefully push back against her most stupid, irrational, ridiculous, and unnecessary demands.

But he doesn’t do it.

And by not fulfilling his actual God-mandated role, he drives his wife literally crazy.

Now, I am not excusing truly insane behaviour on the part of women. Some women are simply nuts and there is no point whatsoever in dealing with them. The sex with them is usually amazing – of the bedsheets-on-fire variety – but the emotional and psychological toll of dealing with all of that pent-up insanity is so high that only the stupidest and most foolhardy man would want to take it on.

Putting a ring on a woman like that is a bit like locking a starving tiger into a cage with a tethered goat – and then volunteering to take the goat’s place.

The key to a harmonious relationship with a woman is to balance out her feminine energy with a man’s masculine energy. This isn’t woo-woo crystal-healing New Age bullshit, it is easily confirmed red-pill wisdom. And one of the best ways to assert masculine energy in a relationship is to learn how to JUST. SAY. NO.

That video shows very clearly that Jorge never realised that he needed to learn how to say “no”. In fact, Anfisa makes the transactional nature of their relationship very clear and absolutely explicit. As she points out, if she were fat and ugly, Jorge would never date her – and if he were not at least capable of pretending to be wealthy, she would never date him either.

The problem that simps have is that they lie to themselves all the time – and because of this, they can never say no, they can never rule their own emotions, and they can never rule their woman.

And when the disastrous consequences of their simping are revealed, they do not merely damage themselves – they damage others around them.

Don’t be a simp. There are ways to get out of that particular kind of Hell. And it starts by simply telling the truth, as much as you possibly can.

Relentless, brutal, unsparing honesty with oneself is a wonderful cure for many ills. It is deeply unpleasant, at least at first. But, as the old saying goes, an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure, and when it comes to simping, the more nasty-tasting prevention one imbibes, the better off one is down the line.