In case you are American and therefore have had most of your attention consumed by the ongoing clown-car crash that is the Daemoncratic primary circus – which I will certainly admit is highly entertaining and compelling to watch – across the Pond in Europe, a serious crisis is brewing (again) with migrants from Syria.

The Turkish government has evidently had quite enough of dealing with the roughly 3.6 MILLION Syrians within their borders. I personally witnessed a few of the effects of the influx of Syrian refugees into Turkey when I was in Istanbul back in June 2018. They were in a truly pitiable state, reduced to begging in very bad Turkish – because Syrians are Arabs, by and large, and therefore speak and understand Arabic, a totally different language – and worse English.

It was heartbreaking to see. These people had done nothing wrong, but they had been forced to flee their homes and leave everything behind for a life of misery and poverty in a foreign country.

This absolutely does not mean that anyone in Europe should welcome in refugees from Syria, under any circumstances.

The Greeks are doing exactly what is right and necessary by shutting down their border with Turkey and firing tear gas and rubber bullets at the thousands of Syrians who want to come in to their country and get free shit from the Europeans. In fact, the Greeks are going a step further and actually sinking the damn boats containing refugees from Syria:

Now, this is unquestionably an extremely hard-hearted and nasty attitude to take. Are we not, as Christians, required to love our neighbours and help those in need?

Yes, we are. The parable of the Good Samaritan makes it clear that we are to help those in need, give them our own money, and help them where we can.

But NOTHING in Scripture says that we are to take those needy people into our own homes and give them free access to everything that we have.

This is the critical mistake that Biblically illiterate secular idiots, and far too many liberal-hearted (and soft-headed) Churchians make. Not one word in the aforementioned parable states that the Samaritan took the waylaid man into his own home.

Here’s how you help someone in need, from a personal example.

Just yesterday I was walking along the street with a companion when we came across a young chap who was standing on the sidewalk proclaiming loudly to everyone that he needed some money to get back home. My companion turned to me and asked if I had any money on me to help the guy out – he didn’t look like a drug addict or alcoholic or street beggar, he was decently dressed and spoke clearly.

I confirmed that I had some decent amount of loose change, scooped it out of my wallet, and then we turned around and walked back to the chap. My companion asked him what had happened to him, and he proceeded to lay out his (rather amusing) tale of woe.

Essentially, this young man had a few days’ leave from his Army service, and he traveled out to meet an old buddy of his in the city. His mate promised him money for the trip back, so the young man made his way out there. He and his friend proceeded to get roaring drunk – as young men full of piss and vinegar are apt to do – and his friend got arrested, which immediately torpedoed his ability to get back to his home.

So he had to ask passersby for cash to get back home. He took our proffered funds with great gratitude, we went on our way, and presumably he is at this point on his way back home as well.

I’m not telling you this story to show you what a good guy I am, because I’m not. I am the kind of guy who says that you should sink the ships carrying refugees to a foreign country in order to deter any more invading hordes from entering your country. This, by definition, makes me a very nasty person.

But, in fact, there is tremendous historical precedent for doing precisely this, as an excellent Voxiversity video from our beloved and dreaded Supreme Dark Lord (PBUH) explains:

The Romans faced 300,000 Goths on their borders in the 4th Century. They let both the barbaric Ostrogoths and the more refined and civilised – and Christian – Visigoths into their realms. And 38 years later, Rome itself had been sacked and looted, precipitating the final phase of the destruction of the Western Roman Empire.

In 2016 alone, Europe had nearly 1.3 MILLION people apply for asylum within the borders of the EU28. That, by the way, is just one year and only accounts for the legal asylum applications. The total number of people who crossed illegally is estimated at 1.8 million in 2015 and 500,000 or so in 2016. All of the relevant statistics can be found here.

That is one of the largest mass migration movements in human history. And I write with considerable sympathy for the plight of the migrants here when I say that this is a disaster for them and for the countries which have to deal with them.

I myself am a descendant of, basically, refugees of a sort. When my country of origin was partitioned, millions of people from one side of an arbitrary border suddenly found themselves dispossessed and disenfranchised, and had to make their way over to the other side – leaving pretty much everything that they had behind in order to make an entirely new life for themselves. The rupture was so terrible and so brutal that it left scars upon the national psyches of the countries involved that persist to this day.

That does not mean that I think that it is a good idea for Europeans to let in Syrian Arabs, whose ideas about equality, tolerance, women’s rights, religious freedoms, and economic liberty are all radically opposed to their own.

Never let it be forgotten that immigration ultimately equals war. The outcomes of mass immigration are indistinguishable in the long run from those of actual warfare.

As I have stated before, the point of war is to impose a complete change in the leadership, way of life, customs, and traditions of a people, that they explicitly reject and do not want, through force of arms.

The results of mass migration precisely mirror these outcomes.

Look at what has happened in large parts of Sweden and France. Muslims now make up about 10% of the population of France, and entire sections of Paris are now shut down for Friday prayers with Muslims praying directly in the streets. Large parts of Swedish cities are considered “no-go zones” by their own police and the non-Muslim, non-African, non-Arab residents of those sections live under the influence of a way of life that is explicitly not theirs.

In every way, the results are identical to an Arab-led conquest of Europe. The fact that it is not a large-scale conquest is, at this point, completely irrelevant. The point is that territories that were once thriving centres of European culture, are now degenerate and squalid blighted spots of Arab culture.

You may not like what I write. You may even find it profoundly offensive. To that, I simply respond:

Go to London, take a walk through Islington, and then take the Tube and go to Shadwell and walk around Tower Hamlets and tell me what you see.

You’ll quickly realise that the biggest and most influential metropolitan centres in Europe are rapidly being overtaken by a foreign culture that has nothing in common with the original one that it is replacing – and is totally incapable of maintaining basic sanitation, civil decency, and law and order.

The way to solve the present refugee crisis is to let Turkey and Syria, and their various allies, fight things out to a stalemate. Right now, Syria is a complete CATASTROF**K of a mess – there are at least five different regional and international powers involved. and all of them are fighting over the charred and broken remains of a country that has nothing to offer other than relatively limited amounts of oil.

Russia, Turkey, Iran, Saudi Arabia, Iraq, the United States of America, France, the United Kingdom, and even the fragmented and disjointed tribes of the Kurds are all squabbling over Syria for a long and complex laundry list of reasons, some of them profoundly stupid. But ultimately, the Syrian people are the losers.

The solution here is to let the various powers fight it out among themselves – without Western intervention.

Here, His Most Illustrious, Noble, August, Benevolent, and Legendary Celestial Majesty, the God-Emperor of Mankind, Donaldus Triumphus Magnus Astra, the First of His Name – all HAIL the God-Emperor!!! – has done precisely the right thing by almost completely winding down American involvement and letting the other powers duke it out.

America has absolutely no business in Syria beyond pummeling the shit out of ISIS – which is precisely what the God-Emperor has done. With that mission accomplished, let the Syrian dictator Bashir al-Assad do whatever he wants and can to maintain his power base.

If that means letting him exterminate half of his country and gas as many Kurds as he wants – that is a problem for him and for his neighbours to deal with.

Westerners have absolutely no business being there.

The only foreign power that does not border Syria, which has any legitimate claim whatsoever to be involved, is Russia. And that is because the Syrian government actually asked the Russians for military aid and intervention, which the Russians were quite happy to supply in exchange for serious payments. And you will note that the Russians have strictly limited the size and scope of their engagements, and have absolutely refused to take in any refugees of any kind.

This is a highly admirable quality of the Russian people. They do not accept the useless and the weak as immigrants into their country. They want people who will contribute to their economy, adapt to their way of life (and their horrid winters), and generally be good law-abiding citizens who speak the language.

Unlike modern Americans, Russians understand that immigration equals invasion equals war. And they take their own steps to protect themselves from it.

Let the Syrian situation resolve itself. And once the borders are stable and the fighting dies down, return, by force if necessary, every last Syrian refugee who crossed over into Europe.

The European nations are for Europeans. Those Europeans are a good, generous, kind, hard-working, decent, charitable, welcoming, warm, and downright decent bunch, by and large. (Excluding, with some honourable and notable exceptions, the French, for whom I reserve a rather deep distaste as a general rule – and the overall feeling is mutual, actually.)

The Syrian nation is for Syrians. I know next to nothing about those Syrians, other than that they have been horribly mistreated by their own government and by the other powers in the region. They deserve better and I hope and pray that they get better in time.

But – to state the rather obvious, I admit – Syrians are not Europeans, and Europeans are not Syrians. The two do not belong in each other’s lands.

So let the Syrians go home. As good Christians, we can and should give them monetary aid to do so – of our own charitable free will. But under NO circumstances should any people or country be forced to house refugees from a backward and war-torn nation within their own communities.