“We are Forerunners. Guardians of all that exists. The roots of the Galaxy have grown deep under our careful tending. Where there is life, the wisdom of our countless generations has saturated the soil. Our strength is a luminous sun, towards which all intelligence blossoms… And the impervious shelter, beneath which it has prospered.”

The Dawah Diddy files

by | Aug 10, 2025 | Christianity | 6 comments

Few among us have the stomach or the patience to deal with the lies and nonsense of the dawah (proselytiser) community within Izzlam. The average honest man, who knows more than just what the dawahgandists tell them about the Fake Religion of Peace,cannot spend more than five minutes dealing with their absurdities. It does not take a whole lot to pierce through that very flimsy veil of lies – all you have to do, to check anything they tell you, is to look at the texts they (usually incorrectly or partially) quote.

Dealing with lies is tiresome and frustrating. This is why Christian polemicists who attack the fake moon-god Allah, and Mo’Lester the Paedophile Profit (Police and Lawsuits Be Upon Him), tend to get rather short and grumpy with Muslims who insist on mindlessly repeating those lies. All you have to do, is to observe how the likes of Sam Shamoun, or Avery from GodLogic Apologetics, or Jay Dyer, or especially Christian Prince, handle Izzlamick callers into their channels – they treat them with extreme bluntness the moment they display the signature dishonesty and evasion that characterises your typical brainwashed Muslim.

It is rare, indeed, to find an honest Muslim – because an honest Muslim, who truly confronts the fake scriptures of this Satanic death-cult at face value, and then delves deeper into the entirely fabricated history of their faith, is an EX-MUSLIM. This always and invariably happens. Whenever a Muslim undergoes that extremely painful and difficult journey, he ALWAYS comes out the other side with his conviction in the fake moon-god and the Paedophile Profit completely shattered.

The dawah clowns, particularly in the UK, have been catching on to this rather sad reality for some time now. They have been getting increasingly desperate as the Izzlamick Dilemma argument has spread and taken hold around the world – they are unable to answer it effectively without outright lying, because the entire argument comes down to a very straightforward and airtight set of propositions:

  • The Koran affirms the inspiration, preservation, and authority of the Scriptures that came before it – specifically, the Torah, the Gospel (of Jesus Christ), and the Psalms;
  • These texts specifically contradict the Koran and the core Izzlamick texts;
  • Therefore, Izzlam is false;

You can even boil the Izzlamick Dilemma down further, into the following:

  • If the Bible is true, the Koran is false, because the Bible contradicts the Koran on critically important teachings, especially on the nature of God and the godhood of Jesus Christ;
  • If the Bible is false, the Koran is still false, because the Koran rests its entire claim to authority on the inspiration, preservation, and authenticity of the previous scriptures;

This is, I repeat, an unsolvable dilemma – unless you lie about what Izzlam’s core texts teach.

Which is, of course, precisely what the dawah clowns, particularly the ones in Britain, have been doing.

However, it turns out, that was not all they were lying about. They were lying about their own personal lives, too – and not merely to their gullible followers, but to their own wives.

The saga started a few years ago, when one Mohammed Hegab – better known online as “Muhammad Hijab”, and considered one of the biggest (literally, considering he stands not far off from seven feet tall) proponents of Izzlam in Britain – secretly married a woman known only as “Sister Aisha”, in an Izzlamick marriage.

This would not normally raise eyebrows, because Izzlam specifically permits muttah, or “temporary marriage”, in the Koran. Supposedly, this was later abrogated in the hadith for Sunni Muslims, but Shi’a Muslims still agree with the practice and condone it. The idea is that a Muslim man can draw up a temporary marriage contract, for a span of a few hours to a few days, and the man then pays the woman (and, as it happens, the mullah who marries them), a certain “fee” or “dowry”.

If this sounds like basically legalised prostitution to you, then congratulations, you have greater moral clarity than the ENTIRE Izzlamick community worldwide.

Hijab’s marriage would, under Izzlamick rules, not have been a problem – except for the fact that Aisha believed it was a genuine marriage, and Hijab told her, shall we say, an elastic version of his present situation with respect to his current marital status. (I have to be rather careful with my words here, for various reasons.)

When she found out that Hijab had, so to speak, “misled the House”, she started asking around about what Izzlamick law actually said, and that journey took her to a chap named “Sheik Tawraneh”, who tried to help her find justice.

Hijab and his cronies – including one “Ali Dawah”, the helium-voiced pipsqueak who talks big but performs dismally in real debates – then conspired to attack Tawraneh’s reputation, leading to him having health issues and a bit of a breakdown.

It took another Muslim to expose all of this and point out all the skulduggery going on:

And it did not take long for Christians to start investigating the whole story themselves:

The story really just gets worse and worse from there.

It turns out that a number of dawah bros have (or at least, had) a WhatsApp group chat, from which someone leaked the contents – which were DIABOLICAL:

This all culminated in Aisha herself appearing on a livestream with a panel of Christians and ex-Muslims, telling her story, and making it clear that Hijab is an abusive, narcissistic, extraordinarily pernicious individual:

The dawah scene is under pressure like we have never seen before. The internet is, indeed the absolute worst thing that ever happened to Izzlam, because it has finally exposed to the entire world, in easily digestible video format, what was formerly only known to highly specialised linguists and scholars who had to spend literal DECADES locked away in libraries researching this stuff.

Today, you and I can go online and lookup all of the problems with Izzlam’s historicity, scriptural inconsistencies, moral failings, and sheer violence. It does not take much at all for an even mildly curious individual to utterly destroy the foundations of Izzlam – an hour or less of research on YouTube is sufficient to do the job.

And now you can see how the wheels are falling off the dawah clown car, as well.

The sad part is, though, that if you have any experience whatsoever talking with British or American Muslims, most of them are completely brainwashed, because they have never taken the time that people like me have taken, to try to understand what is going on behind the scenes. And they will continue to follow clowns like Lily Dawah and Hijab, just because they hear things coming from these idiots that they like, and they think these men provide a good moral standard.

However, there is increasing evidence that Western Muslims, at least, are apostasising in numbers never seen before. While Izzlam IS expanding rapidly in the West, it is coming from birthrates, NOT conversion. The statistic I have heard kicking around is that the average convert to Izzlam, leaves within 3 years or less, because of the sheer retardation of that death-cult.

But now, we are seeing more and more evidence – coming from Muslim sheikhs themselves – that the apostasy crisis is reaching epidemic levels, even among native-born Muslims:

The reason is simple. They are increasingly being forced to confront the vast discrepancies between what their books tell them – and what they hear from well-informed street preachers and people in the know, who can push back against dawah lies.

When even their own top scholars admit that the Izzlamick standard for judging the validity and accuracy of anything that Mo’Lester the Paedophile Profit (Police and Lawsuits Be Upon Him) ever said, is completely ridiculous and not respected by any serious Western academic, then Muslims have a very serious problem that they cannot overcome:

Worse, they cannot fail to recognise the huge gulf between the supposed enlightenment of Izzlam, and the reality on the ground of Izzlamick communities across the West – where cousin-marriage is common, child abuse is rampant, and prostitution in the form of “temporary marriage” is widely practiced.

Ultimately, this puts them in direct conflict with one of the greatest of God’s gifts.

God imprinted on each of us a moral sense, a clear understanding, at a very deep spiritual level, of what is right and wrong. We can suppress or ignore it for a good long while, but doing so inevitably causes serious problems for the human psyche. Eventually, we have to confront the discrepancy between what we think is right, and what our soul and spirit tell us is right.

Muslims across the West are now confronting this. Their moon-god and his Paedophile Profit are losing.

And Jesus Christ, who is LORD, is winning.

Subscribe to Didactic Mind

* indicates required
Email Format

Recent Thoughts

If you enjoyed this article, please:

  • Visit the Support page and check out the ways to support my work through purchases and affiliate links;
  • Email me and connect directly;
  • Share this article via social media;

6 Comments

  1. Robert W

    It’s hard to defend the crusades as a biblical solution for the church to counter Islam.

    Jesus says the one who lives by the sword, dies by the sword.

    Now you see a 4gw response by the church to Islam. Not the sword of steel but the sword of the Spirit delivered in truth.

    One pushed Islam back from some territory for a few centuries. The other will wreck the entire system by the end of this century and see millions of souls find their way to the Father.

    Jesus Wins.

    Reply
    • Randale6

      Even as agnostic I must defend the crusades…their failure was not do to being an “unbiblical solution”. Their failure was due entirely to being repeatedly backstabbed by their own “allies”. Notice that the Byzantines chose to play internal politics (and fraternize with Muslims) rather than support the allies they had called upon to save them. No matter how strong you may be you will not last long against an enemy at your front when your “friends” are stabbing you in the back.

      Reply
      • Robert W

        The reasons to defend the crusades are myriad, but they do not involve the teachings of Jesus nor his direct apostles.

        Net positive for Europe despite the Byzantine betrayals.

        It presents lessons for further growth of the church to learn from. In the lens of her preparing herself as the Bride of Christ, they represent a temper tantrum of adolescence rather then the mature decisions of a wise woman.

        You see in this post which is more effective at expanding the Kingdom of Heaven on this earth.

        Reply
    • Odnam's Razor

      “One pushed Islam back from some territory for a few centuries.”
      .
      that’s a weird way to characterize the Reconquista.
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconquista
      .
      the last i looked, Spain and Portugal were still not under Islam ( although the new Satanic Atheism is doing it’s best to reverse that ). Eastern Europe also had a great deal of success. but you have to remember, it’s not just a question of freeing territories which Islam had conquered by the sword, much of Europe NEVER FELL to the caliphates. and that was a direct consequence of the military response of the time. Islam certainly didn’t stop because they got bored.
      .
      https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Hunyadi

      Reply
      • Robert W

        You’ll notice in both of these, national and tribal movements drove Islam out and secured the land for posterity.

        The crusades were church coordinated multi national efforts to conquer the “holy land” and aid the Byzantine who, being Byzantine betrayed everyone.

        One of these matches the biblical pattern of nations prospering best when faithful to God and developing their own families. One of these matches the clown world strategy of multi national “let’s you and him fight”

        Reply
      • Odnam's Razor

        eh, Hungary literally led their own crusade ( “The Kingdom of Hungary led several crusades, campaigns and carried out several defence battles and sieges against the Ottomans”. ). and literally enlisted EMPIRES ( Byzantine, Bulgarian, amongst many other international allies ) to lend them aid against the Ottomans.
        .
        and the Reconquista wasn’t started by the Iberians, it was started by the French. particularly Pepin the Short and Charlemagne and remained a widely international effort throughout. “Afonso Henriques and his successors, aided by Crusaders and the military monastic orders the Knights Templar, the Order of Aviz or the Order of Saint James, pushed the Moors to the Algarve on the southern coast of Portugal.”
        and further, the Reconquista was very international and messy with fraternal infighting all over the place on both the Christian and Muslim sides, with both Christians fighting against Christians in service of Muslims ( how El Cid got his start ), and Muslims fighting against Muslims in service of Christian kingdoms. and, of course, there was multi-centuries of aid coordinated by the Roman Catholic Church in this. just as Hungary received aid from both the Catholic and Byzantine churches and kingdoms.

        Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Didactic Mind Archives

Didactic Mind by Category