“We are Forerunners. Guardians of all that exists. The roots of the Galaxy have grown deep under our careful tending. Where there is life, the wisdom of our countless generations has saturated the soil. Our strength is a luminous sun, towards which all intelligence blossoms… And the impervious shelter, beneath which it has prospered.”

Ask Didact Anything day

by | Dec 9, 2021 | Domain Query | 5 comments

It’s been a busy few weeks for me, but a number of very good queries came in recently, and I figured that I should put in the time and effort to answer them with the thoroughness that they deserve. I got a couple of emails and comments that I felt deserved significant treatment, and some of those messages merited full podcasts in their own rights. Today’s post, therefore, contains a wealth of information, so pull up a chair, put on some headphones, and enjoy at your leisure.

If people like this sort of thing, I might make it more of a feature around here. I like and encourage reader interaction and feedback, of course, so if you have a burning question in mind, or you want my thoughts on a particular issue, either leave a comment, or shoot me an email.

Domain Query: To Settle or To Grind

The Domain Query series is finally back with a new episode – two of them in one day, actually – with a very involved and interesting question from LRFotS Randale6, which I quote in full below:

A request for one of your next episodes, I suppose you could call it “hope for a hailmary woman or just grind on”. I was walking in the park one day and noticed something, all the couples walking the paths had muscular men…and half the women were fat, another quarter overweight and only the remaining quarter was thin.

Simply put, even if I achieve the body of Adonis all I’m going to get is a fat, worthless whore. This makes me wonder, is it a better idea to simply grind onto an early retirement via stock market investment (Nikolai Vladivostok’s The Poor Man’s guide to building wealth is my bible for this)?

I know that in latin america a gringo with even just 1 million (equating to 40k at a 4% withdrawal rate per year) would be living at the minimum a middle class lifestyle if not a fully upper middle class one. I would live well…and courtesy of latin america’s poor social safety net for women I would have a fairly wide selection of mujeres. 

If I go that route though…how do I keep myself functioning in the meantime? I have to live long enough to enjoy the benefits of early retirement after all. What do I do to keep my body from aging into a broken, dottering corpse?  Your advice would be greatly appreciated.

In this podcast, I go over the following points:

  • Red Pill 101 conditional logic that dictates which option to take – women now, versus money now (oh yeah, I finally remembered the name of the Pacino character from Scarface – TONY MONTANA);
  • What to do about the scarcity of attractive women in one’s area, and where to go to get past the issue;
  • Why the “poon/payola” dichotomy is actually a false, and indeed dangerous, one from a Christian perspective;
  • How to avoid boredom and dissipation as a man in a foreign country;
  • Potential dangers and issues with moving overseas, and emphasis on fitting in and acculturating;

On a related note, the Limitless Living course will, at some point, be spruced-up, re-branded, and re-released – at a MUCH lower price than it was initially. By that point, there should be enough people interested in getting out of Western hellholes to generate some actual sales, which would be nice.

Here’s the actual podcast:

Domain Query: Fear of the Long Dark

Davy Jones Do You Fear Death GIF - Davy Jones Do You Fear Death Pirates Of  The Caribean - Discover & Share GIFs

Here’s the second of the day’s Domain Query series, based on a very interesting long comment from LRFotS Kapios on my post about resilience:

It gets worse before things get better. Knowing that intellectually and feeling it to every last bone in your body is a big difference as I’ve realized.

There is one subject that I would like to see you tackle in a post sometime in the future, and that is overcoming the fear of death. Not the YOLO I’m taking cocaine and partying kind, but the one that you hear about warriors in the past who had a lot to lose, their lands, properties, families, etc. and yet they were still able to fight as if they were not attached t those things.

How do people do that? I have been thinking about this a lot with the recent trend of mandatory vaccinations.

Someone who had lived in a monastery for more than a decade told me this about a week ago: ‘The threat to lock me up and starve me to death if I don’t put the vaccine will not change my mind. I would rather die of starvation if it comes to that, because it’s my choice’.

My country has not introduced mandatory vaccination like Austria (probably because they are waiting to see what happens with other countries), but I believe the person who told me that. He is not perfect, but he and a few other people who live there have been threatened and harassed by the police, unjustly criticized by others in the past and yet, they haven’t changed their conviction.

I answer this question from the straightforward point of view of a Christian (an extremely bad one, mind you), and why Christians might fear dying – I certainly do – but not death itself. I unpack an answer rooted in Scripture, starting with Matthew 10, and drawing on references within the texts, and come to the conclusion that the way to avoid this problem of fear of death is to find something bigger than yourself, which you believe in and love enough to give your life to protect. That is the way out of this dilemma.

Here’s the podcast itself:

The DeepFake Instathot

Polish (!!!) reader chiroro wrote in with a very good set of comments about Ms Kanika Batra, who inspired a post about the terrible dangers of the Jezebel spirit. Here are his comments, redacted and edited where necessary:

  • Her photos on Instaham, with all of the makeup and digital post-processing, really should count as “deepfake” images;
  • She has “dead fish eyes” about 99% of the time, together with that baby voice, but she does show flashes of life when speaking about herself, or about someone else being hurt – see this video, for example;
  • She doesn’t actually want to be evil, but psychology (as one of many Christian heresies) won’t save her – see this post from Darek (Roosh’s Polish diminutive name);
  • Offering prayer and Holy Communion for her is not a waste – however, we [Catholics, presumably – Didact] believe that if someone rejects grace, God can “transfer” it to someone else;

Also, quoting directly here:

Darek is the Polish diminutive of Roosh’s full name. I know he associates Poland with (his?) sin, but he’s too hard on us. Even when he was still an active PUA, I’ve listened to one of his rants on YT and thought: wow, this guy sounds just like some Polish priests (and he was wearing all black to match). Well, he’s become an Orthodox monk instead, but it’s close enough. It would be so funny if he became a Greek Catholic priest in Poland (rare) or Ukraine (common).

— chiroro

It’s really interesting to see where all of my various readers and commenters come from – honestly, I usually think that about three men and a dog read my posts, and they’re all in America. So when I see that my podcasts and posts are listened to and read in Russia, Poland, Germany, Australia, Singapore, Israel, and Mexico, and a lot of other places besides, I really feel quite heartened by that.

With respect to the points above, I absolutely agree about the fact that Ms Batra is a deepfake girl. And that is entirely consistent with her narcissistic personality disorder. If you read Michael Trust’s book on the subject of narcissists, you’ll understand very quickly that they live entirely fictional lives in their heads. They have to construct a false reality in their heads, and that is the reality that they attempt to present to the world.

The best of them can convince you very easily that what you see is the real person. But most narcissists cannot do this. They are actually quite toxic to be around – if you feel mentally exhausted after being around someone, yet recover very quickly simply by going for a walk and feel much more energetic as a result, you are very likely dealing with a narcissist.

I also agree that Ms Batra won’t be saved by psychology, though I will say that secular psychology can do a lot to undo the damage caused by these disorders. It is possible to train one’s mind using those methods to deal with past traumas and move to a better place. But it is not a permanent fix. The only way to do that is by accepting Christ and the gifts of the Holy Spirit.

It is also important to understand the distinction between psychiatry, which Roosh rightly largely condemns, and psychology. They are categorically NOT the same thing.

Psychiatry involves giving people pills to rewire their brain chemistry. This is HUGELY dangerous. It so happens that my own grandfather was on quite powerful antidepressant drugs for YEARS, and after his death, looking back, we concluded that it probably ruined his mind.

Psychology is about exploring the inner recesses of the mind, digging out past trauma, confronting it, and moving past it. Modern psychology is pretentious and stupid beyond measure, certainly, but when understood properly, it is simply an extension of philosophy, and when used in that manner, it is definitely useful. Most modern forms of psychology are all kinds of wrong, but there IS a core of truth behind it all.

Christian psychology, or therapy, is useful and effective, because it centres one’s mind on Jesus Christ and on God. This is good. However, there are some flaws in Christian psychology as well, particularly when it refuses to address actual psychological issues behind someone’s trauma and simply gives out shibboleths like, “be meek”, or “do not be anxious”, without looking into the reasons why someone is anxious and then pointing the way back to God as the solution.

Finally, with respect to transferred grace, well, if that is a core Catholic belief, all I can say is that I don’t agree with that, at all. I fail to see where it says anything of the sort in Scripture. That, to me, smacks of yet another Catholic invention, like the immaculate conception of the Blessed Virgin Mary, or her role as an intercessor, or the existence of Popes dating back to Peter, or the nature of the Mass, and so on and so forth.

If someone rejects grace, then he or she rejects it – end of story. God knows everything about what one’s heart contains – and God will not violate one’s free will by bestowing grace on someone who doesn’t ask for it. Nor, as far as I can tell, will He then transfer that same grace to someone else who didn’t ask for it directly.

Personally, I have no problem with worshipping in a Catholic church or cathedral, and I have no problem praying for those who need it, like Ms Batra. What they choose to do with those prayers, is up to them. But I really do wish that Catholics would stop just crafting extra-Biblical narratives that have little to no basis in Scripture.

Coming back to Roosh, my good friend from Israel, Dawn Pine, and I were discussing him just the other day. As another friend, Adam Piggott the Gentleman Adventurer, has pointed out, Roosh has a problem with moderation. He tends to see the world in black and white far too much of the time – see what he said about drinking caffeine, for instance, which was plain silly. His PUA tendencies toward extremes have since morphed into extremes with religion. He’ll be OK eventually, whenever he finds a happy medium, but what he has been going through for the past few years is part of the calibration process to get to that point.

Baby Got Back-the-F**k-Away!

SIR MIX-A-LOT - Very Demotivational - Demotivational Posters | Very  Demotivational | Funny Pictures | Funny Posters | Funny Meme

This last one is from LRFotS robertdwood, who had a very amusing side comment in relation to the last Great Mondaydact Browser Blaster:

I had a moment at jiujitsu the other day. I’m sitting there watching as my son is in his class, looking through a space the size of two folding chairs. Suddenly a huge bottom with a human attached walks between me and the mat and fills the entire space. All of it, jammed into ‘sleek’ leggings and elevated boots, eg, chunky heels. This lady wasn’t even middle aged yet and clearly put work into her dressy outfit, but was numbingly oversized and oblivious to blocking the entire mat from my view.

My question: is this an American phenomenon? I get that the USA is full of gluttons and that’s not common internationally, but is the trying to look good while being a whale strategy seen anywhere else you go?

First and foremost, I doff my cap to you, good sir, for taking your boy to jiu-jitsu classes at a young age. This is EXACTLY how fathers should raise their sons.

This comment reminds me of that hysterical bit from Jeff Foxworthy from a few years ago, from his “Redneck Fashion Tips” segment:

God bless that man. He is THE funniest man alive.

To the specific point raised by our friend:

No, this is not unique just to American women. But they DO have by far the worst case of this condition.

You will see this affliction particularly among women who inhabit PommieBastardLande. A certain particularly acerbic Sefrikin by the name of Kim du Toit refers to this particularly disastrous category of females as “train smash women”. This is the kind of thing we’re talking about:

Aintree 2015: The crowds, the glamour and the excitement ...
All The Classiest Chicks In The UK Are At Aintree Grand ...
Royal Ascot 2018 photos: Brits behaving badly | NT News
The rain FINALLY stops as the Queen arrives at Ascot ...
Binge drinking: Why do intelligent women drink to oblivion ...

I want to make it very clear that these women think that they are PRIME CATCHES, and English culture reinforces that shit.

You also see this a lot among South Asian women, but that is less because of an innate lack of modesty in the culture, and more just the fact that South Asian women are generally significantly uglier than anywhere else outside of Africa.

(Oooooh I can FEEL the hate. Sorry, not sorry, it’s TRUE. I’ve written multiple posts on the subject.)

I don’t quite understand why, but South Asian women really do get slapped HARD by the Hambeast Fairy’s Ugly-Stick. It’s pretty nasty to watch. The moment – and I do mean THE VERY MOMENT – that a South Asian, and especially Indian, woman gets married, she basically sees that as an excuse to let herself go in every department.

And Indian men, being the colossal blue-pill Betas that they are, don’t hold them accountable for it. They don’t know any better or different. So you have an entire subcontinent in the grips of colossal sexual dysfunction and awash with unattractive to outright ugly women.

But Indian women don’t generally think of themselves as “super sexy while fat”. They just like to dress up in fancy clothes while draped in a full jewellery store’s worth of gold. They are much more modest, as a general rule, than their Western sisters.

If you really want to see that awful American fatass-who-thinks-she’s-a-supermodel attitude on full display, outside of the USA, try parts of northern England, or Scotland, or Australia. The fatasses there would give their American hambeast sisters a serious run for their Twinkies.

Et Finis

That's all folks! | www.TeeTee.eu

I hope y’all enjoyed that. It took a while to put together, but I think I managed to address a bunch of different questions all at once. As always, comment and share, and if you want me to do this again at some point in the future, shoot me an email or three. I’ll get around to it… eventually.

Subscribe to Didactic Mind

* indicates required
Email Format

Recent Thoughts

If you enjoyed this article, please:

  • Visit the Support page and check out the ways to support my work through purchases and affiliate links;
  • Email me and connect directly;
  • Share this article via social media;

5 Comments

  1. doclove

    I will try to answer as best I can as a Catholic Christian layman some things about our beliefs. The Immaculate conception makes sense to me. You said in a previous podcast that God hates to be around sin and I agree with this. Since God hates to be around sin, the priest explained in the homily that the only way Jesus could enter into this world to be one of us a human and still be the 2nd person in the trinity of God is to be born of a woman who is also without Original Sin on the Feast of the Immaculate Conception which was a holy day of obligation to attend mass for us Catholics every year in December which is part of the Season of Advent before Christmas which was on 08 December 2021 Wednesday this year. Mary, called the Mother of God and the mother of Jesus of Nazareth, persuaded Jesus to perform his 1st publicly recorded by the Bible Book of John Chapter 2 Verses 1 thru 12 by changing water into wine at the weeding in Cana when the wine was running short. If Mary can ask Jesus to perform this miracle, then she can ask Jesus to have mercy on our souls and let us into heaven even though not a one of us myself included deserves it. Catholics adore only God including the Word of God, the 2nd person in the Trinity of God named Jesus of Nazareth but venerate Mary and all of the other Angels and Saints. We Catholics ask all of the Angels and Saints in Heaven, the Church Triumphant, to include Mary of Nazareth to pray for us the same as asking any other person enow living to pray for us or do a favor for us especially if they are fellow Christians, the Church Militant. Mary is held in high regard by Catholics because without her giving birth to Jesus then we would have no chance at Salvation because of Jesus so that makes Jesus directly responsible for our salvation and Mary indirectly responsible for our Salvation. The importance of the mass is especially found in the Liturgy of the Eucharist where we remember that Jesus died for our sins, and he instructed us to do so at the Last supper so we may share in the Passion of Christ while we are here on Earth at least once a week and preferably every day as well as hopefully join Him in the Resurrection of the dead with life everlasting. Anyway, you do fine work here. Keep up the good work.

    Reply
    • Didact

      Thank you for providing the Catholic perspective and commentary. I appreciate the feedback.

      With respect to the points you raise, a few issues with the logic immediately arise:

      First, the problem of infinite regress. If the problem is the issue of sinfulness, rather than purity and chastity, then what is to stop Mary’s mother from being conceived through immaculate means? After all, that’s the only way it makes sense, since otherwise, the angel of the Lord could not enter Mary’s mother to plant the seed that became the Virgin Mary. And if that is the case… where do you stop? You’d have to go back to ALL the women, ALL the way back to Eve, to claim immaculate conception to avoid the issue of sinfulness.

      Second, the problem of the miraculous birth. Jesus is the entire driving force of the Old Testament prophecies, the entire point of the New Testament. If Mary was born of immaculate conception, this leaves no room for Jesus as the true Saviour.

      Third, the problem of Mary as the intercessor. Nowhere is this mentioned in any of the Scriptures. Mary is barely mentioned in the New Testament once Jesus is an adult, and nowhere is she shown as someone who can change Jesus’s mind. Yet, the Catholic Mass, particularly in the Vulgate after Second Vatican, very clearly implores Mary to intercede to persuade God to provide redemption to sinners. This makes no sense whatsoever. Mary has never been shown to have any power in the Scriptures to change Jesus’s mind, and while Our Lord clearly respects and honours her in the way that He addresses her, He also makes very clear in John 2 that their relationship is no longer merely mother to son, but woman to Lord. In that specific chapter, Jesus makes perfectly clear that the issue of the wine is not His problem – and she leaves it up to Him to decide what to do. She doesn’t persuade Him. She simply points out the problem.

      Fourth, the problem of the sacrificial Mass. Pastor John Macarthur has outlined the flaws with the Catholic sacraments rather well, by pointing out the flaws involved in a Mass in which the bread literally becomes the flesh of Christ – which obviates the entire point of one sacrifice for all, made once, forevermore.

      Here is an alternative set of views, which I think are healthy to view and understand:

      https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL_hX1yntQEcGeZ23jr0dnrnfoEbAM0W2G

      While I respect the Catholic Church and do not wish it ill – and, as I said, I have no problems worshipping in a Catholic church or cathedral – there are some serious flaws in the logic and doctrine that make it difficult to stomach.

      In fairness, I think the same way about pretty much EVERY Christian denomination, so I’m not singling the Catholics out for criticism here, just so we’re clear.

      Reply
  2. robertdwood

    That is an outstanding answer. The only place with the primetime hambeast fashion icons is the predecessors to the rebel colony…at present rates we’ll catch up to that DISASTER in 15 years.

    That woman is frightful, as is the picture of Cosby holding her up. I did not realize he got into weight lifting.

    I started jiujitsu this year after a while of reading your blog here, thank you for the bump to get after it. I wish I had started long before 30 years, and so far he likes it too.

    Reply
  3. Kapios

    I have been very bummed out by all the shit that’s going on lately, so this podcast was a breath of fresh air. Sometimes, It’s just good to get some encouragement from others.

    Time to go back to kicking ass.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Didactic Mind Archives

Didactic Mind by Category