I’ve been banging on for a while now about how the US military couldn’t win so much as an egg-and-spoon race at this point, much less an actual shooting war with China or, especially, Russia. Few, if any, of my readers disagree with me – including those who, unlike me, have actually served in the military, and are therefore rather more highly qualified than some jumped-up keyboard jockey to write on the subject. But I’m not sure any of us – veteran or civilian – really understands how deeply the rot runs within the dot-mil. It is probably significantly worse than any of us realise.
And that is for one very good reason:
The US Army has basically taken up CrossShit as its standard fitness programme under the guidance of ACoS and CJCS Gen. Mark Milley.
No, seriously, that’s the truth, I’m not making this up – that’s basically what the Army Combat Fitness Test (ACFT) is all about, and they’ve had this idiotic scheme in the works since 2018 and implemented it pretty much in full last year. A shill site for the idea has this to say about it:
According the final report of this research, “Since the creation of the U.S Army, physical fitness training has played an important role in combat readiness. However, throughout its history the U.S. Army’s method for conducting physical fitness training has changed and evolved. Most recently, in the late 1990s, the U.S. Army began to see evidence that its method of conducting physical training was not producing Soldiers ready for the rigors of modern ground combat.”
“This reality began a general move within the U.S. military towards functional fitness programs as many leaders and organizations began to rethink physical training and its relation to combat readiness. In 2006, it was estimated that up to 7,000 members of the U.S. military were using the CrossFit program regularly. That number has grown exponentially since then represented by the fact that there are now over 58 non-profit military CrossFit affiliates throughout the world, to include affiliates at many major U.S. Army installations like Fort Bragg, Fort Hood, Fort Polk, Fort Knox, Fort Meade, Fort Leavenworth, the Pentagon and the U.S. Military Academy.”
This idea of functional fitness is a critical component of the U.S. military training. According to the Mayo Clinic, “Functional fitness exercises train your muscles to work together and prepare them for daily tasks by simulating common movements you might do at home, at work or in sports. While using various muscles in the upper and lower body at the same time, functional fitness exercises also emphasize core stability.”
OK, seriously, I really don’t get why ex-military types like CrossShit so much. It just doesn’t make any sense. As I’ve pointed out REPEATEDLY for the better part of a decade of writing on this site and its predecessor, Didact’s Reach, CrossFit’s programming is not “functional”, it is functionally RETARDED. It is STUPID beyond measure. It is genuinely dangerous and extremely badly planned.
There is nothing “functional” about it – CrossShit programming tries to blend weight training with cardio, and fails, badly, at both, while damaging the central nervous systems and muscles of the idiots stupid enough to waste $120 a month (or more) on a “fitness” programme that has about as much to do with real fitness as your belly lint does.
I would argue, based on what I have seen of CrossShit programming over the years, that if you were to implement that sort of nonsense in an actual military, most people would fail – especially the women – and injury rates would skyrocket.
And, indeed, that is precisely what happened:
The U.S. Army has a readiness problem the likes of which it has not seen since the draft, and one which threatens to undermine the entire institution. This problem is called the Army Combat Fitness Test. The ACFT was designed to improve the physical fitness levels of soldiers. Because it was so poorly planned, however, 84% of women failed it straightaway, and data is scarce as to whether things have improved. This is a big problem because failure of a graded physical fitness evaluation renders a soldier ineligible for promotion, locked out of specialized training that might otherwise improve a soldier’s acumen or skillset, and ultimately, risks seeing them kicked out of the Army entirely.
Meanwhile, military medical staff—surgeons, nurses, dentists, optometrists, general physicians—are, sources tell me, eyeing ACFT standards skeptically and planning to exit the Army as soon as possible. (Congress certainly seems to fear this possibility, according to language in the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2021, signed into law earlier this year.) A surgeon can make a lot more money in the private sector than in a uniform. This has obvious, serious implications for military readiness, as an Army without skilled doctors is an Army in serious trouble should a new war suddenly break out.
The fact that most women failed the test right away is not a Bad Thing. I have been arguing for years, and a number of veterans who read my work agree with me on this, that women have absolutely NO PLACE In a fighting military, and especially not in combat roles.
LTC Tom Kratman (US-A, ret.) literally wrote a book about how you might go about creating an all-female military fighting force based on science and data, not wishful thinking and egalitarian stupidity, and his premise relied on conclusions drawn from extensive field experience in which he realised right away that the only way for women to fight in combat in mixed units would be to lower standards to catastrophically low levels for the most dangerous and serious of all professions. The only way to do it without compromising the entire military would be to create all-female units with very different fighting standards that account for the facts that women are much weaker than men, especially in terms of upper body strength, and cannot take the kind of pounding on their joints that we can.
And what is the ACFT, exactly? Well, here are the criteria which people must meet in order to pass it, from the same source:
- Strength Dead-Lift (140-340 pounds)
- Standing Power Throw (10-pound medicine ball)
- Hand-Release Push-Ups
- Sprint-Drag-Carry (sprint, drag a 90 pound sled, and then lateral shuffle then carry two 40-pound kettlebells)
- Leg Tuck (hanging from a pull-up bar, pull yourself up and bring your knees or thighs to your elbows) or planks (2:09 to 4:20 minutes)
- 2-Mile Run (minimum: 13:30 minutes, to maximum: 21:00 minutes)
So basically, you have to do a CrossShit WOD to pass your Army combat-readiness certification.
What a joke.
I have no idea what “hand-release push-ups” are, nor do I understand what a “leg-tuck” is. And given my dodgy knee and jacked-up back, a 2-mile run sounds like my idea of Hell. But I could probably still do all of that, even though I’m old, my joints creak and pop when I move, and I have considerable amounts of grey hair. Hell, for me a 225lb deadlift is what I call a warm-up, and that’s FAR beyond what most women, and quite a lot of men, would consider to be their max.
But, here’s the thing: I can do all of that because I do powerlifting and martial arts. And you need some level of equipment to do those things. You need a gym, and barbells, and space to go berserk like an angry gorilla in need of an attitude adjustment. It’s great fun, to be sure, and it gets you fit and strong like nothing else can. (To be clear, I’m talking about powerlifting, not CrossShit, which is basically just competitive exercising.)
Here’s the thing, though: nobody in his right mind would consider me to be a soldier.
The basic requirements for soldiering, at least in terms of physical fitness, have not actually changed that much since the days of the foot-sloggers of Sargon the Great when he made the Sumerians say “Uncle!”. Line infantry spend an awful lot of time marching, even today – so they need to be able to march and carry heavy shit from one place to another. They also need to be familiar with their weapons, which in modern terms means spending time shooting stuff.
These tasks require strength and fitness, to be sure. But you will not get that kind of strength from doing CrossShit. Doesn’t happen. CrossShit isn’t about carrying 40lb rucksacks for 20 miles on foot. It’s about pretending to be Olympic lifters, sprinters, rowers, and wall-climbers to stroke people’s egos.
(You won’t get the necessary fitness results from doing powerlifting, either, to be clear – there is a REASON why most powerlifters look like this:
… and not like this:

But you will get strong from powerlifting. You won’t from doing CrossShit. Doing that crap will result in losing gains.)
The ACFT is a perfect example of what happens when a military begins to pride innovation for the sake of innovation over tried and proven methods. The old Army Physical Fitness Test demanded recruits and active-duty personnel alike to demonstrate actual field-ready fitness according to standards that would make them lean, mean, and ready to fight. But then, to accommodate women and an ever-fattening population, the Army lowered its standards to allow girls and lardasses to pass them.
The result is the modern, kinder, gentler Army:
The issue of obesity in the U.S. has been causing major problems for the U.S. military for years. In 2010, upon entering basic training, 47 percent of males and 59 percent of females failed the Army’s entry-level physical fitness test, according to the report. To solve this problem, the study recommends looking beyond the military itself and recognizing the positive impact government policies aimed at improving public health could have on the military.
Department of Defense data from 2016 found roughly 7.8 percent of the military––roughly one in every 13 troops––is clinically overweight, according to Military Times. This endangers U.S. troops, according to current and former military officers.
In September 2016, Army Command Sgt. Maj. John Troxell said, “If I have to climb up to the top of a mountain in Nuristan, in Afghanistan, and if I have someone who is classified as clinically obese, they are potentially going to be a liability for me on that patrol.” Troxell is the senior noncommissioned officer in the U.S. Armed Forces, making him the top enlisted adviser to Joint Chiefs Chairman Gen. Joseph Dunford.
Welp, that’s the modern US military for you – too politically correct to keep its ships from running aground, too obsessed with idiotic flying Swiss Army knives to build aircraft that work, and too obsessed with being all inclusive and diverse to notice that its enemies are falling off their chairs laughing at their stupidity.
And now, as it happens, too involved in faddish, badly thought out, idiotically implemented, pointless, useless, stupid, and ridiculous trends like CrossShit to build an Army capable of performing the actual, y’know, FUNCTIONS of an ARMY. Which is to say, hoofing it to places where drones can’t fire missiles, tanks can’t go, and Humvees can’t venture, in order to fight enemies on the ground with hot lead fired with lethal intent out of guns that actually shoot straight.
Oh well. We’ve already seen CrossShit cripple professional exercisers in their annual “games”. Now we get to watch as it cripples an entire standing army.
Say what you will about these Clown World times we live in, they ARE at least interesting.
8 Comments
But like the guy in Starship Troopers says “Why do we have to do all this physical training when wars are won by some pencil-neck pushing a button to launch a nuke?” Then he gets a knife through his hand.
I do like that scene, even though I generally hate that movie.
That being said… if they had called that film anything OTHER than STARSHIP TROOPERS, I actually would have liked it. The film is campy, cheesy, stupid… and yet strangely compelling.
Don’t sweat this PT Test. It disadvantages women, on the one hand, and is a pain in the ass to administer, on the other. It has no friends except a small clique of PT loons at Carlisle Barracks. Expect it to be put to sleep sometime in the next 30 months.
Indeed, sir. It would appear that this is already happening.
What I’m curious about is whether the warning signs were there earlier on, during the Obarmy Administration. From what I understand, the Lightworker basically purged the ranks of competent and skilled top brass and high-performing candidates for flag rank. What level of the current kind of nonsense did you see before you left?
The leg tuck requirement is a significant red flag.
It doesn’t require ten, just one.
Do 1 pull up. Then bring your knees to your elbows.
That’s it.
It compares to a datapoint Angela Hartman has in her book for Child Development, Balanced and Barefoot.
She references a study where a set of children are tested for fitness metrics in 4th grade in 1980 and in 2010. These metrics are simple: How long can you hang from a monkey bar? How quickly can you navigate crossing a balance beam? How fast can you run this sprint?
The data is segmented into 12 portions. (If it were quarter sections they would be quartiles, so whatever the term is for dozen-tiles).
If you took the middle-level students from the 1980 results and transported them into 2010, they would fill up the top 1/12th of the 2010 tier. No study participant in 2010 would fit in the top two segments of 1980.
Naturally, the strength developed in childhood scales effectively to adults. Strong children tend to become strong adults, weak children stay weak. Probably a combination of developed habits and biological responses.
So the army does have a real problem: They get only weak people and have to figure out how to still fill ranks. As with the Dark Lord’s MPAI theory, of course they’re going about it completely wrong.
Yeah, that’s somewhat along the lines of my thinking as well. The fact that the Army currently struggles to fill its ranks with recruits fit enough to do the job, is a direct consequence of the culture in which it operates. And that culture is fat, slow, and weak. But the Army’s job is to take that raw material and shape it into warriors. And that part now is no longer happening either, simply because they need to meet quotas. So, instead of focusing on the mission for which we need a military, the Army focuses now on unrealistic and silly fitness tests based on bad programming and bad principles.
Of course, the Army already appears to be walking the test back as fast as it can, which is a sure-fire indication that even the top brass understands that it f-ed up.
Don’t get to hung up on this fake test. It is already failing, because it was initially set to roll out in FY 2020, but has been delayed because of various reasons. It will fail once it is fully implemented. Doesn’t measure any type of fitness. The “old” U.S. Army PFT was a baseline endurance fitness test. How many pushups, situps, you can knock out in 2 minutes. Then you did a timed two-mile run. The scores for all 3 components were determined by your age and gender. So, as a male 17-21 years old and you knocked out 71 pushups in 2 minutes you had a score of 100. A situp score of 100 for this same age group would require 78. As for the 2-mile run, a time of 13:00 would give you 100 points. The army requires recruits in a score of 50 in each event to graduate basic, and maintain a score of 60 in each event in OSUT/AIT and in your regular army career.
For reference, I did the test in May 2020. I knocked out 66 pushups, 76 situps, did the 2-mile run in 17:09 (all timed by my wife, she’s a military brat, no skimping on standards with her). According to my age group (52-56-and no I’m not a stinkin’ boomer, leading edge GenX), my score was 280. My run would’ve been faster on a track, because my neighborhood is full of hills (it’s my excuse…and old age). I would’ve scored 100 in the 42-46 age for pushups (10 years younger than me) and 100 in the 32-36 age group for situps. Yeah, my run sucked, old age and two rebuild jobs on my right knee have slowed me down.
As far as the members of the Doorkickers Union (people in the operations side of the house, for example: Infantry; Special Operations; Special Forces; Aviation, et.al.), most of them already know they need to be better than the numbers of the minimums (whether they work at it is another question only to be answered by the individual…). But, I’ve been lucky to be around some Army and Marine Corps Infantry guys, and they were fit, and could run. I’ve never met any active duty SEALs, Marine Raiders (also Force Recon guys), Green Berets, and Rangers, (haven’t met any Air Force PJs or CCTs-their special ops guys) who were not in great physical shape. Their lives and the lives of guys they stand next to, depend on being in the best physical shape they could be in. All these guys in these careers are lean, muscular (not powerbuilders but strong), and have great endurance. All of these guys have to “ruck” with weight, some have to swim (SEALS and the Marine Recon and Raiders), run, and do O-course in order to get through the assessment phase (SEALs do BUD/S which is it own little version of hell on earth, but it works), to get to the training and the fun stuff…
The army brass (being stupid, which is normal in all militaries), should’ve incorporated some the lessons learned from urban combat in Iraq and mountain combat in Afghanistan (Aren’t the “Afghans” 4-0 against empires,,,? Just asking?), in regards to actual functional combat fitness. Oh like having soldier do a ruck run for a mile with a 40 lb ruck and their battle rattle, for time, as part of the test? How about a 25 yard shuttle run, for 150 yards, with your IBA, war belt, and rifle, for time? Just me spitballin’?
Yeah. And to be honest, even at my fittest, I would struggle with the old Army fitness test. I hate doing cardio – my idea of real cardio is smashing my limbs into a heavy bag for 30 minutes, or sparring for an hour. But running is just murder on my body and my joints. And as a result, I’d almost certainly fail the test.
But the new test is even dumber, and it will almost surely fail when implemented. As you and others have pointed out, it is already failing and will probably be walked back – and indeed that appears to be happening already.
Even so, none of this bodes well for the future. A military designed for the clear purpose of killing people and breaking things is a military that puts time and effort into making its men fit, alert, relaxed, and ready for action at any time. The Roman legions had fitness standards in its day that most modern militaries would fail abjectly today – and that was by design. It turned rabble into an unbreakable wall of steel and will – which is why the Romans had probably the best heavy infantry in the world for the better part of a thousand years.
By contrast, the US military appears to be focused on hitting recruitment quotas, and to hell with standards. This isn’t going to end well.