A few days ago I pointed out the utter futility and emptiness of living according to the false gospel of Social Justice. Today I figured it might be worth taking a few minutes to look at how one’s life can improve by simply letting go of the sheer stupidity of that ideology and taking some responsibility for oneself and one’s actions.

The interview below, between the one and only Joe Rogan – badass among badasses – and a “former male feminist”, is a rather interesting and revealing case study showing us how an SJW can recover and become an actual, useful, productive human being:

Now, the thing is, I had no idea who Jamie Kilstein is before today. I do not watch much by way of stand-up comedy, mostly because I find the overwhelming majority of it to be crass and spectacularly stupid. It just so happened that I was surfing random YouTube videos (because I was bored out of my freakin’ mind at work – it was that kind of week) and came across that one after watching Joe Rogan eviscerate “male feminists”.

Now, like quite a lot of “male feminists”, it seemed as though Mr. Kilstein had been embroiled in a bit of a controversy in the past. So I went and looked him up. And it turns out, he was.

Mr. Kilstein followed the usual pattern of that particularly pathetic and irritating deviant branch of the Tree of Humanity known as the “male feminist”. He started off with weak masculine role models. He discovered that spouting all of the “right” bromides concerning feminism helped get him laid – though quite likely not with terribly high-quality women, if this picture of him with his ex-wife is anything to go by. He decided that signalling virtue, as hard and as often as possible, was more important than actually doing anything of much worth in his life.

This served him well – for a while, anyway.

And then, inevitably, he got hammered with a bunch of sexual harassment claims by the very women that he had spent so many years kissing up to – because, as it happens, when it comes to rank hypocrisy, “male feminists” tend to be the worst perpetrators of it.

Mr. Kilstein discovered firsthand what happens when the revolution devours its own children – which always happens in any ideology not rooted in natural, therefore Divine, law. It does not matter where you look in history: every ideology ever founded on the impossible quest for complete equality between disparate groups, without exception, has turned on itself because its internal contradictions are not sustainable.

And make no mistake: Mr. Kilstein was unquestionably a true believer in the false gospel of Social Justice. Witness what happened when he went on a previous edition of Joe Rogan’s podcast and got into a rather heated debate with the host about the nature and severity of rape.

The difference between Mr. Kilstein’s purported version of events, and what actually happened, is vast. But this is to be expected from an SJW. After all, as it is written by our own Supreme Dark Lord (PBUH), they lie, they double down, and they project.

Yet, even for SJWs, there is hope. And that is what Mr. Kilstein represents.

You can see it in the truly immense change in demeanour and personality between the second video and the first above. In the second video, Jamie Kilstein embodies everything that the rest of us so loathe and despise in SJWs – the snarky and deeply unfunny sense of humour, the effeminate nasal voice devoid of all masculinity, the stooped and weak physique that makes an utter mockery of masculine strength, and the never-ending stream of lies and misinformation that comprises the sum total of an SJW’s ability to “argue”.

In the first video, by contrast, Mr. Kilstein is calmer, quieter, and clearly willing to take responsibility for the words of his mouth. His experience was clearly traumatic for him, but then it often takes severe and repeated beatings with a clue-bat before some of us wake up and realise what miserable excuses for men we really are.

Make no mistake, he still has a VERY long way to go – most reformed SJWs usually do, especially during the early days, by definition. His voice is still annoyingly nasal, revealing a likely severe lack of testosterone, and his physique still resembles a child’s doll made with dry spaghetti sticks. However, both problems are easily resolved through hard exercise, the best of good eating, proper supplementation, and plenty of rest and fluids.

His speech patterns need a lot of work, of course. The infuriatingly American tendency to pause in such jarring fashion in mid-sentence and punctuate one’s thoughts with useless filler words such as “like” – always used in an improper context, of course – is ever-present and makes listening to him a thoroughly grating and unpleasant experience.

But that, too, can be fixed with time and effort.

And, based on what we can see, Mr. Kilstein does know a thing or two about self-defence through active participation in martial arts. As I have written many times before, there is no faster or more effective way for a man to rediscover his masculine strength than within a brotherhood of like-minded men, bonded by blood and pain within the study of the martial sciences.

The lesson to take away here is that, no matter how far a man falls into the Satanic lies of the social justice movement, there is always hope for him. He has to make the choice to redeem himself, and the path to that redemption is incredibly hard and painful in many cases, but the journey itself is worth the effort.

There is worth in (almost) every man, except for the truly psychopathic and the genuinely evil. For those men, nothing can be done; they are human trash, and one way or another, they are bound for damnation.

The vast majority of men who follow them, however, are enslaved into unthinking compliance with an ideology that they may not necessary understand very well, because they have never put in the hard work of understanding themselves and their world.

It is on these men that we must focus our efforts. When they make the choice to come back to the light, of their own accord, then it is our duty to help them do so – subject to them earning our trust. As always, in such things, the rule must be: trust, but verify.