The more closely one looks at Islam with anything like a normal desire to weigh up the evidence and come to rational conclusions about what one finds, the more one is driven to the unavoidable fact that Islam is absolutely incompatible with Western civilisation.

It would be easy to go on for hours (and hours, and hours) in deep investigative detail about this subject. Any halfway decent look at the obscure and complicated origins of Islam, for instance, will reveal very quickly that the entire standard story that we are taught about how Islam spread, is simply bunk. The “prophet” Muhammad (or Mohammed, or even Mahomet – take your pick as to spelling) almost certainly did not exist as he is described in the most important texts of the Islamic ideology, the Koran, the Hadith, and the Sirah.

In reality, the “prophet” described in those texts is most likely a composite of several historical figures and was actively inserted or “retconned” into Islam’s scriptural history after an Arabic takeover of what was, for at least a century after Islam’s supposed beginnings, a more or less Persian religion with origins in a thriving but quite thoroughly heretical reform Judaism heresy of Christianity.

But, let us assume for the sake of argument here that a prophet named Muhammad did exist, as described by the original texts of Islam, and that he really did do all of the sick, perverted, twisted, disgusting things that the books say he did.

Then the fair-minded observer must conclude without hesitation that under no circumstances can a heresy of Christianity, that twists and maligns the Gospels and the Epistles so thoroughly, and which so completely misunderstands the Old Testament, be considered compatible with Western civilisation.

Take, for example, the holiest site in Islam – the Kaaba in Mecca. This is supposedly the first site ever built for the purpose of worshiping Allah, the “god” of Islam, by Abraham, way back when.

Unfortunately, Islamic theology is not consistent with what the Old Testament says – even though Islam supposedly accepts the Old Testament wholesale and accepts Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, and Jesus as prophets:

It gets rather worse than this. If you try to examine who actually wrote the Koran, you come very quickly to the conclusion that it was not in fact the immutable word of God, dictated to a prophet by His Archangel, but written by very human hands – several of them, in fact – and extensively modified over a long period from its original purpose:

And what was that original purpose? As far as anyone can tell, the original text, before modification, which is still contained within the current, heavily edited text, was basically a Syriac lectionary text used by the Ebionites – the reform Judaism heretics mentioned above, who flourished throughout Arabia and much of the Middle East at around the time of Islam’s emergence.

We could go on in this vein for quite a while, picking at Islam’s many internal contradictions and inconsistencies. At this point, the devout Muslim would ask – not without justification, and not without considerable anger – why we are picking on his faith. Why not pick on Judaism or Christianity, or any other major religion, and take that apart?

The answer to this comes from the fact that the more closely you look at the ancient Jewish and Christian texts, the more you are forced to conclude that there is a very powerful internal consistency between the Old Testament and the New.

As readers have pointed out to me repeatedly in private communications, the New Testament is internally consistent within itself. If one were to act in the capacity of an atheist forensic detective and sift through the Gospels as one might go through eyewitness testimony looking for contradictions, one is forced to conclude that the Apostles were describing events that they personally witnessed and that what overlaps and contradictions do exist, serve to reinforce, not deny, Christianity’s assertion that a prophet named Yeshua was sent to Earth by God as His Son, “with whom [He is] well pleased”, both wholly God and wholly Man, preached a revolutionary ministry, and was arrested, tortured, and executed on the Cross.

And that is before we get to the fact that numerous prophecies in the Old Testament, written hundreds  of or even a thousand years before Jesus walked the soil of Israel, were fulfilled by Him. The writers of the Gospels make this clear repeatedly in noting the prophecies of Isaiah, Daniel, Elijah, and others which were fulfilled by the Christ.

That is before we get to all of the “mirrors and shadings” – I think I probably butchered that phrase a bit – between the texts of the Old Testament and the New, before we look closely at home many themes are internally consistent between the two texts.

Simply put – the more closely that one examines the New Testament with a critical eye toward the evidence, the more one is forced to conclude that Jesus actually did know what He was talking about, that He really did exist, and that He really did do what He claimed to do.

And, most importantly, that He really did die and then return.

If this last did not occur, then there is only one inescapable conclusion: Christianity is the most monstrous lie ever foisted upon the human race.

Yet the evidence that we have presents an extremely strong case that the Christ was resurrected.

Islam seeks to deny this by claiming that Allah spirited Jesus away to Jannah (Islamic paradise) and allowed an impostor to die on the Cross in His place. The point of this is to show that Christianity is a false gospel and Islam is the completion of God’s Word.

Unfortunately, Islam fails a very basic test which Christianity clearly passes.

When it comes to dietary laws, for instance, Jesus was absolutely clear in His teachings: the moral laws of Moses are inviolable, but the ceremonial laws are overruled and discarded. Among those ceremonial rules are most of the dietary restrictions concerning shellfish, pork, and other things.

Islam is (supposedly) just as unequivocal: the Old Testament’s laws concerning dietary restrictions are not to be broken.

Except, of course, when the “prophet” of Islam breaks them, flagrantly and repeatedly, according to Islam’s own “sacred” texts:

So basically Islam cannot get its own story straight with respect to whether it is the completion of the Old Testament, its own “prophet” breaks Jewish dietary restrictions repeatedly, and performs no miracles of any kind to substantiate or fulfill any prior prophecies.

At this point, based on only a relatively cursory examination of the Islamic sources, the alert inquisitor might well be found scratching his head and asking, “what the hell do people see in Islam that makes even the slightest lick of sense?!?!?!?”

For that, we turn back to the excellent work of Mr. David Wood, who examines the origins of the Islamic fasting season of Ramadan and in the process makes a critically important point about the faith:

As Mr. Wood correctly points out, Islam takes the most base and sinful instincts of the flesh – gluttony, wrath, lust, pride, envy, and that’s just for starters – and elevates them into the pathway to Paradise.

When you give horny, greedy, hungry, uneducated men literally Divine license to sin and tell them that sinning is actually saintly, do not then be surprised when people start sinning en masse.

Christianity, by contrast, tells men to be restrained and keep themselves under strict control. Jesus literally tells His followers that if they so much as look at another woman with lust in their hearts, they have already committed adultery, and that a man cannot divorce his wife except for reasons of true adultery.

That is an exceptionally difficult teaching to follow, since the instinct of every young man is to have as much sex as he can, as often as he can, with as many women as he can. Yeshua, however, told His followers to keep it in their pants and to stick to one woman.

You will not find a more radically pro-woman faith at that, or any other, time in history.

Even after all of this, the true nail in Islam’s coffin, so to speak, comes from examining… well, the death of the “prophet”, actually:

So. Not only was Muhammad blinded by his own pride, which led to his death, but he got offed in exactly the manner that he said would be inflicted upon him if he were a false prophet – thereby proving that he was a false prophet and smashing the entire edifice of Islam into smithereens.

Honestly, sometimes God just hands you one for free.

No wonder adherents of Islam hate Jews so much – especially Jewish women. A Jewess was literally responsible for turning their entire faith into a complete laughingstock.

Sadly, hundreds of millions of people around the world continue to believe in the enormous ugly tangled snarl of stupid lies that is Islam. And the Western world, which appears to be afflicted with a terminal case of suicidal idiocy, insists on letting them into Western nations in their tens and hundreds of thousands.

The results are about what you might expect, really.

Consanguinity – known to you and me in plain English as “inbreeding” – has some seriously nasty consequences, and we are seeing those consequences across the Western world in cities where Islam has taken firm root:

Relationships described as ‘consanguineous’ are those between couples who are at least second cousins or more closely related. The practice has been legal in Britain for more than 400 years, but is considered one of society’s last taboos.

In British Pakistani and Bangladeshi communities, marriage between cousins is designed to strengthen the family and keep wealth intact.

But there are massive health risks involved for the children of such couples. And when they are tragically born with disabilities, it is taxpayers who are left to pick up the huge costs of their NHS treatment, which can run into millions over a lifetime.

New official figures shown to the Mail reveal a worrying picture across England. Shockingly, cousin marriages are a key factor in an average of two child deaths every week.

This figure is derived from the fact that a total of 545 boys or girls born to closely related couples have died in childhood during the past five years, according to the Department for Education, which collates data from Child Death Overview Panels in every council area. (It is the job of these panels to examine the deaths of any child under the age of 18.)

Thousands more children of consanguineous marriages survive, but with appalling physical or mental problems. These include blindness, deafness, blood ailments, heart or kidney failure, lung or liver problems and a myriad of often incurable and complex neurological or brain disorders.

According to a report for the BBC’s Newsnight, British Pakistanis are 13 times more likely to have children with genetic disorders than the general population.

They are responsible for three percent of all births, but produce just under a third of all British children with such health problems.

In Birmingham, around one in ten children from first cousin marriages either dies in infancy or develops a serious life-long disability caused by genetic ailments, according to health officials in the city, where half the mothers of Pakistani origin are married to a close relative.

Meanwhile, a research document by the NHS-funded Enhanced Genetic Services Project reveals that in Birmingham in 2009-2010, the combined infant stillbirth and death rate ‘definitely or probably’ due to genetic disorders inherited from Pakistani cousin parents was 38 times higher than that among white European babies in the city.

The report — one of the most thorough into this health and social problem — says: ‘Almost a third of the affected children die before five years of age.

Most of the survivors suffer chronic disability, and they are cared for by their families, posing tremendous emotional and financial strain.’

It gets worse the deeper one looks into the issue:

And now we get to what happens when Islam begins to take over one’s cities. The results are extremely problematic:

The evidence points to one absolutely inescapable, unavoidable, and direct conclusion:

Islam has no place in the West.

Individually and in some cases collectively, Muslims have many splendid and decent qualities. They have some pretty good food – in some cases, anyway, as I am quite partial to gyros, falafel, and doner kebabs. (Though I draw the line at Pakistani food. And I tried Ethiopian food once. The operative there is, “TRIED”. Never again.)

But those individual qualities cannot compensate at all for the fact that they believe in a violent, racist, supremacist, intolerant, anti-scientific, anti-Biblical, utterly self-contradictory, hopelessly backward, and downright barbaric political ideology masked as a faith, which sanctifies all manner of evil sin – and is especially abusive of women and children.

The West must expel this poison from its bowels, or it will die an agonising death just as – quite ironically- the false “prophet” of Islam did.