Most of us do not bother with the online debates between Christians and Moose Limbs, mostly because we have more immediate things to worry about. But it would be a mistake to ignore that scene, because there has been a profound power shift in the relationship between Christianity and Izzlam for the past 20 years.

To understand this shift, you need to watch at least the highlights of a recent debate between Godlogic (aka Avery), and one Muhammad Hegab, better known as “Muhammad Hijab”:

Let me spare you the excruciating experience of listening to Hijab’s idiotic chimp-outs and bullying tactics, by telling you how this particular episode ended:

Hijab went to EWCHOOB and got them to land a copyright strike against Avery, pulling the video:

In case you are unfamiliar with Izzlamick debate tactics, this is pretty normal for them. It is what happens when one of their best “debaters” gets BTFOd, as the kids say these days. When they lose face in public like this, they panic, demand the platform moderators take down these videos, and then go about thumping their chests and acting tough, as if they won some great victory.

The problem for them is that the internet no longer allows them to hide their cowardice and treachery.

It did not take long before the ENTIRE Christian apologist sphere picked up on the debate and examined it:

Why is this important? Why does it matter?

Because it shows just how thoroughly the ground has shifted in the 1,400-year-long war between Izzlam and Christianity – it is CORRECT to call it a war.

If you rewind the clock back to the bad old days of the late 1990s, radical Izzlamist f**kwits were able to get away with chanting, “Death to America!”, and “Izzlam will rule the world!” pretty openly in public, and there was not a whole lot that the pozzed-out nominally “Christian” West seemed to be willing to do about it. Any attempts to engage Izzlamists in debate usually ended quite badly, because the Izzlamists had studied Christian texts closely and thoroughly, and came armed to debates with memorised quotes and passages galore. Izzlamick texts, by comparison, were impenetrably dense and difficult to access in the Western world.

Then 9/11 happened, and the Izzlamists suddenly changed their tune, because they realised that they were the targets of real and vicious hatred in the Western world. And, while I do not agree with or condone that hatred, at all, it is not difficult to understand why. After all, MUSLIMS crashed those airliners into the Twin Towers (or so we are told – I believe the “official” story about 9/11 about as much as I believe in the Tooth Fairy, at this point), and a MUSLIM named Osama bin Laden supposedly provided the financing and coordination for the attack.

So the Izzlamists switched over to being “nice”, and trying to convert through reason and argument. But the core reality of Izzlam was still there, still just as evil and nasty as ever.

Things were bleak and difficult for Christian apologists. They had little ability to engage Muslims on their own terms and turf. The Christian churches and academies had spent so long fighting back against secular humanism, atheism, and godlessness, that they had produced hordes of academics and debaters who could easily dismantle the likes of a Richard Dawkins or Daniel Dennett – but were useless against the likes of a Zakir Naik.

Then… the Internet happened. YouTube happened. And, gradually at first, then suddenly, the tide turned. The momentum shifted.

The Internet made it possible to access Izzlam’s core texts in English, with high-quality translations. A whole new generation of Christian youth were able to examine in detail the Koran, hadith, Sirah, tafsir, and tahriq – respectively, the “word” of Allah, the sayings of Mo’Lester the Paedophile Profit (Police and Lawsuits Be Upon Him), the biography of the same, the commentaries of the scholars on the previous three, and the histories of Mankind according to those scholars.

These 5 genres of Izzlamick theology, once impossible to access due to the Magick Arabick language that Moose Limbs love to pretend gives their dogma some sort of special impenetrable hidden meaning, now became open to the entire world to see.

As a direct result, Christian apologists and polemicists began to engage Moose Limbs directly on their own turf, challenging them to online and in-person debates, and quoting their own sources right back at them.

Izzlam in the West has never truly recovered since then.

This is not an exaggeration. If you travel through much of Western Europe, you will be convinced that the continent is going to turn Mohammedan in the next 50 years. But this is NOT because of superior arguments, or a better faith offering. It is happening almost ENTIRELY because of immigration and high birth rates among the Izzlamick communities that the West has so stupidly permitted to flood into their countries.

When it comes to convincing people through arguments and debate, by contrast, Christians are winning just about every time. And the Moose Limbs know it, and they are in a panic.

Again, that is not an exaggeration. The likes of David Wood and others have been talking about the “Avalanche of Apostasy” since at least 2018, and they are right. Young Muslims, in particular, are apostatising at rates never witnessed before in the entire 1,400-year history of that death cult. This is not merely restricted to Western countries, either. In Iran, the government’s own polling data show that, when asked anonymously, young Iranians, in particular, simply no longer believe in Izzlam. The same is true across the GCC states, and across much of Southeast Asia.

The holdout countries, like India, Pakistan, and Nigeria, produce some of the most radical and ugly Izzlamists you can imagine. But the rest of the Izzlamick world is slowly retreating from the barbarism and evil of their paedophile profit.

Moose Limb debaters in the West are in full-blown panic about this, and again, that is not an overstatement of the situation. Multiple Christian apologists and polemicists in the UK talk about how, when they go to Speaker’s Corner in Hyde Park on a Sunday afternoon to debate Muslims, their top debaters – Ali Dawah, Muhammad Hijab, Mansour Ahmed, and many others – simply run. They refuse to engage:

The reason this is happening, is because all we have to do now, is to point out their own books and sources. Every single one of their lies has collapsed around their ears over the past 20 years – and in particular, over the past 6 or so, ever since the now infamous and legendary “Holes in the Narrative” discussion between Muhammad Hijab and Dr. Yasir Qadhi.

The “perfectly preserved Koran”. The “ONE AND ONLY Koran”. The age of Aisha. The authority of the Koran over the Torah and Gospel. The idea that Izzlam corrects and supersedes Christianity and Judaism. The notion that Muhammad appears by name in the Christian Scriptures. The so-called “scientific miracles” of the Koran. The prophecies of Muhammad. The historicity of Izzlam. No matter where and how you look, Izzlam simply has NO ANSWER to any of the factual commentaries and criticisms of its own internal and external problems.

Christianity is not merely winning the debate. It has WON. Moose Limbs are simply UNABLE to come up with good counterarguments to ANY of this.

Indeed, there is good reason to believe that the entire history and scripture of Izzlam is a pure fabrication. We can conclude this based on the fact that Mecca, as described in Izzlamick theology, simply did not exist in the 7th Century. There is ZERO archaeological, economic, trade, or military evidence to suggest the presence of a major trading city on the Arabian desert plateau that long ago.

The logical chain that follows is as devastating as it is simple:

If Mecca did not exist, then neither did Muhammad.

If Muhammad did not exist, then neither did he receive the Koran as divine revelation.

If the Koran is not divine revelation, then it is a man-made construct.

If the Koran is a man-made construct, then Izzlam is not merely false – it is the greatest lie ever told.

And the evidence around these points is simply indisputable. It is there for all to see. Whether you look at the historical critique, or the manuscript evidence, or the Izzlamick sources themselves, you are confronted on every level with inescapable evidence that Izzlam is a purely man-made concoction.

All we have to do is read, as Godlogic says – and all we have to do is to point out that Izzlamick scriptures confirm the inspiration, preservation, and authority of the Torah and the Gospel, as Tha Dizzle says.

There is no answer to these issues. Izzlamists cannot reply to them without torturing their own books to say exactly the opposite of what the text actually says. They do it constantly, and then they get extremely butthurt when we point it out to them – to the point of resorting to threats and violence.

The conclusion is simple:

Izzlam has lost, because it was always a lie.

Now, that is not to say that we in the West do not have an awful lot of hard work to do. Izzlam is nothing less than a Satanic death-cult, and if you think that is too strong a description, then all you have to do is ask yourself what the penalty is for apostasy.

Every single school of Izzlam says the penalty is death.

That is the LITERAL DEFINITION of a death-cult.

For the Western world, the consequences of this are straightforward. Muhammedanism must be banned in the West, and its adherents must be given a straightforward choice: renounce it, convert to Christianity, or leave.

This is, by the way, a far more humane alternative than what Izzlam itself presents to the inhabitants of territories conquered by Moose Limbs – convert, subject themselves to humiliation and taxation as dhimmis, or die. Our solution – renunciation, conversion, or expulsion – is far more decent.

It will take a lot of hard work and a long time to achieve those ends. Doing so will mean forcing the old liberal globalist world order out, and it is increasingly obvious this cannot happen through the ballot box. Sooner or later, that order WILL collapse under the weight of its own endless contradictions, and then, perhaps, Reconquista 2.0 can begin.

But, in the meantime, we can all enjoy the spectacle of watching degenerate lowlifes like Hijab getting humiliated, then panicking, and trying to frantically shut down those who showed them up.