The subject of the historicity of Izzlam is something of a black box for most people, because they have always been told the same old story. Namely, there was once a prophet named “Muhammad”, who was born in Mecca in 570 AD, and who started receiving divine revelation directly from an angel of a god named Allah, at the age of 40. He preached in Mecca for 10 years about these revelations, before the irritation and intolerance of the locals forced him to flee to Medina. There, he became a much more forceful character, and started receiving much longer and more detailed revelations, that turned him into a great warrior and leader. He eventually pushed his domain outward, creating the first Islamic caliphate, before dying in 632 AD. He was then succeeded by various “rightly guided caliphs”, who oversaw the rapid growth and expansion of the Caliphate, until it spanned from India to Spain.

This is what those of us who follow the details of Izzlamick historiography more closely, call the “Standard Izzlamick Narrative”. It is the collection of myths and stories that Muslims want us to believe – because they themselves believe it, and because that is what their own texts tell them, but their fake moon-god, their Satanic death-cult, and their beloved Mo’Lester the Paedophile Profit (Police Be Upon Him).

The big problem with it is that EVERY SINGLE THING ABOUT IT IS A LIE.

There is literally NOTHING within the SIN – cute acronym there, it took a brave Christian by the name of Mel from Sneaker’s Corner to come up with that – that can truly be traced back to sources from that specific time-frame, and which corroborate the things Muslims believe. Every single aspect of it is false and fake.

Izzlam is in fact a copy-paste religion, that was essentially manufactured and man-made, by Arabs who sought their own religious and national identity, in the wake of the collapse of the Sassanid Persian Empire in its long wars against the Byzantines. The latter were themselves severely weakened by those same wars, which meant that the Lakhmid and Ghassanid Arab kingdoms – formerly Christian, though following a Monophysite heretical type of Christianity, more in line with the Nestorians than standard Trinitarianism – had the opportunity to build their own identity. And they promptly did, using elements of the Nabatean pagan faith, ancient Judaic practices, and the belief system of the Monophysites.

This becomes apparent the moment you actually start unpacking it. I will not go into the full details here – you can find them all over this site, if you look, and all I did was to pull together a bunch of YouTube videos and textual references from much smarter and more knowledgeable people, who have spent their entire lives investigating the highly obscure origins of Izzlam.

Those of us who looked into the origins of Izzlam quickly realised the whole SIN was nonsensical. But we never knew, until now, just HOW bad it really was – until Dr. Jay Smith from Pfander Films unpacked the latest evidence and research for us, in a MAGISTERIAL two-hour lecture that simply destroys the remaining foundations for Mo’Lester’s life and times:

You really have to think like a Muslim to understand how devastating this is. For 14 centuries, Muslims everywhere have been brainwashed into believing that their Koran has been perfectly preserved, right down to the letter and dot. However, the earliest Izzlamick texts make it perfectly clear that “perfect preservation” is a total myth, and always was. Moreover, those same texts and scholarly traditions make clear that Mo’Lester was a semi-legendary figure, whose true deeds were never actually well-known or recorded – which is VERY strange indeed, considering what an impact he supposedly had.

It turns out, however, that the picture is far worse than even the most polemical Christian ever thought:

The core texts of Izzlam – the Koran, the hadith, and the sirah – did not come into existence until CENTURIES after Mo’Lester’s supposed life, in their final extant forms.

The only way to explain this, is to compare these three genres with their Christian analogues. We, too, have a type of Koran – that is to say, Divine Revelation, in the form of what Jesus taught when He was on Earth. We also have a hadith compilation – that is to say, the utterances of Jesus, which we have in the red-letter parts of the New Testament. And we have the sirah of Jesus – His biography, as recorded by the Apostles in the New Testament Gospels.

The most liberal scholars of the New Testament will tell you that the first Gospel – the Gospel according to Mark – was written down in its final form by about 55-60 AD, and the last one, the Gospel of John, was written down around 90-110 AD. I categorically reject these dates, as they make no sense when you actually read the Gospels, the Book of Acts, and the Epistles – as far as I am concerned, the Gospel of Mark probably appeared by around 40 AD, and the Gospel of John could have been as early as 60 AD, and definitely before 70 AD, purely on the strength of the opening verses of John 5.

Regardless of which dates you accept, this means we have all three genres, describing the life, sayings, works, and teachings of Jesus, within less than 100 years of His death.

Now compare this to the latest dating of the exact same genres from the Izzlamick side.

Not ONE part of the Izzlamick canon existed in its final, traceable form, until SEVEN HUNDRED YEARS after the life and times of their Paedophile Profit.

Would you take seriously the claims that this is the final revelation for all Mankind, if you could prove, definitively, that the core texts of that revelation underwent repeated revision and change for seven hundred years?

Of course not. The Word of God does not need changing or updating. It simply is what it is.

Again, try to compare Izzlam with Christianity to get a sense of how damaging this is. It would be like Dr. Dan Wallace, one of the foremost scholars of the New Testament, telling all of us that, actually, the core texts of the New Testament did not come into their final form until about 750 AD – this, despite Christian claims, for 2,000 years, that we have the manuscript evidence going all the way back to the original Apostles and their disciples. Nobody would ever take Christians seriously again when we talk about the integrity of our Scriptures and the revelations contained therein.

That is what Izzlam is now up against.

That set of revelations from Dr. Smith was bad enough. But Muslims can ignore it, by claiming that he is a Christian with a clear axe to grind against Izzlam. However, they cannot deny it when one of their top scholars – a man who straddles the Oriental and Western academic traditions, and who is both a highly credentialed academic in the origins of Izzlam, as well as a true preacher and sheikh of the faith – says that the hadith are discredited as a way of understanding the past:

This, by the way, is the exact same Sheikh Dr. Yasir Qadhi who, 5 years ago, gave us the infamous and legendary “holes in the narrative” line, which exposed for the entire world the sheer ridiculousness of the SIN. He was the one who finally admitted, out loud and in the open, what Izzlamick scholars have been quietly saying among themselves, not for years, or decades, but literal CENTURIES:

It is impossible to overstate how devastating that was to the Muslim community. Hundreds, and thousands, of Muslims posted furious reactions to that interview, on both Mimi Hijab’s channel, and on Dr. Qadhi’s channel, announcing that they were apostasising from Izzlam because of what Dr. Qadhi said. Both of them had to scramble to contain the damage, but it was far too late.

Now, that same Dr. Qadhi has come out and admitted that the so-called “science” of the hadith, is not taken seriously by anyone who actually looks at it properly.

Again, you have to put yourself in Muslim shoes to understand just how devastating that is. The hadith are absolutely essential to understand the Koran. You cannot do the latter without the former, because the Koran is written in a very dense classical Arabic that is really hard to understand. (It turns out that this is almost surely because the original version of the Koran was written in a different language – Syro-Aramaic – as a series of Christian lectionaries, and then bastardised by the Arabs and later the Persians. But that is a story for another time.)

For instance, without the hadith, you cannot know that Izzlam requires five daily prayers. The Koran doesn’t say that. Nor can you know the full shahada, the declaration of faith that makes you a Muslim. It is not in the Koran. You cannot know what Mo’Lester actually did, because the Koran only mentions him 4 times by name, and even then not explicitly either.

Without the hadith, frankly, the Koran just does not make sense.

And now, one of the very best scholars of Izzlam, anywhere in the world, has admitted, for everyone to see, that Izzlam really has no foundations at all.

It truly is a great time to be a Christian:

Back near the beginning of the year, Tha Dizzle Hizzself said that 2025 would be an amazing year for Christianity, as we continue to push back hard against Izzlam, with ever better arguments, facts, and evidence:

He was, and is, correct. The dawah community in the UK is now imploding under a sex scandal, that would require a poast all of its own to unpack. The Izzlamick Dilemma is proving intractable for Muslims, who are utterly unable to answer it, because their own texts – which are all man-made – have put them in a trap from which there is absolutely no escape. And now we learn that their core texts are so corrupted, so broken, and so obviously fake, that it takes only some basic scrutiny to show the true awfulness of the situation.

Despite that, over a billion souls are lost in this Satanic death-cult. They still insist on believing in the lies of a supposed Arabian caravan-robber, petty warlord, and paedophile – and if you point that out to them, you will be targeted for death. (There is a REASON why this site is banned in Pakistan, after all – and why I poast under a pseudonym.)

Pray for them, that they may find their way out of the darkness that is Izzlam. Some of the best people I have ever met, are Muslims – I cannot say enough good things about the Dagestanis, for instance, and they are mostly Muslim. Pray that they will find their way back to Jesus – the true Jesus, the Jesus who healed the sick and raised the dead, the Jesus who died on the Cross for us sinners, and who rose again on the third day, thereby shattering the Gates of Hell itself.

THAT is the true purpose of the Gospel of Jesus Christ – to bring sinners back home to the Lord. And it is our glorious burden to bring that Gospel, which uplifts every heart and saves every soul, to those who need it the most.