I am pleased to present another guest poast from LRFotS Randale6, who took inspiration from an excellent breakdown of an episode of a TV show called “Accused”, by Manosphere Highlights Daily, that our good friend The Male Brain sent me for the Great Mondaydact Browser Mulcher earlier this week. Our friend casts his eye into the future, to see what life looks like for the STRAWNG INDEPENDENTISS WAMMENZES of today, with the advent of genuine, fully functional sex robots – and it looks very ugly for them.

My thanks as always to our friend for his valuable contributions to the site.

As AI makes advances each and every day a question arises, what should we make of increasingly lifelike sex robots? Imagine, if you will, that five years from now a female sex robot is released, capable of doing everything a woman can (save childbirth) but better. No backstabbing, no bitching, obedient, and not a cross nailed to a man’s backside.

Tantalizing isn’t it? Better than even Eve from the Abrahamic holy books, something you wouldn’t mind waking up to in the morning. But are there downsides to this for men (the downsides for women are a feature, not a bug)? On the individual level the only downside is that these robots cannot conceive, the one advantage women would have over them.

On the communal level though sex robots present a problem for all men, this being that their lack of ability to reproduce results in civilizational failure. Civilization is a nice thing in the grand scheme of things. Its fruits include indoor plumbing, electricity, medicine, food delivery, and in general a much easier existence.

The problem with civilization is that it must be maintained and expanded, this requires someone to do that. Without children being born in sufficent quantities that task becomes more difficult. This means to enjoy our comfortable and fairly easy lives (by historical standards) we must have children to keep things running.

Yet just as sex robots may harm this ultimate goal of eternal civilization they may also help it. Our lifelike, better than the real thing sex robot presents us with the ultimate leverage. By taking away from women their pussy pass (by quenching the thirst of men with sex robots) we can undo 2000 years of error.

Faced with the threat of being replaced and having their persuasive powers neutralized women have only one option: improve or go extinct. This prospect will of course cause women to bitch and whine en masse, yet their own actions ensure that sex robots will become a thing in time. After the mandatory complaining period some women will face the music and accept reality. Those who do not, will be bred out.

For 2,000 years, Western civilization has increasingly indulged in the anti-civilizational poison known as feminism. It is true, the dose started off small but with every passing century the dose has increased. Starting with the Abrahamic inch (women are still subserviant but respected) western women have taken the feminist mile (we will be parasities and you will get nothing).

We can change the clock back to a more suitable system of male and female relations, that being the family code of ancient and wise Rome. Pater familias is the way, a system in which the man decides and the woman obeys. A woman’s only right being to not have to suffer an (official) rival in the form of polygamous marriage.

The role of sex robots in such a system is threefold, acting as concubines for men, a tool to humble to women, and an end to the female pussy pass. Eve has proven to us through bitter experience that she is unfit to make decisions. Women are the weaker and inferior sex, the sooner they accept this reality the better for both men and civilization.

If sex robots are what is required for women to gulp down this bitter medicine then let sex robots be welcomed. Pater familias is the way an dit is high time we return to it. No more chivalry, no more bluepilling, and no more cucking.

Didactic Imperative

First, may I say thank you again to our friend for his thoughtful commentary on AIthots. In all seriousness, his writing mirrors what I had to say on the subject some years ago. I have written multiple articles on the potential impact of sex robots in human society – including here, here, here, and especially here.

I agree that realistic, anatomically accurate, intelligent (or at least, seemingly intelligent) female sex robots, will shift the power dynamic so completely away from modern women, that it will result in the cataclysmic collapse of their value.

Never forget that a woman’s value lies in youth, beauty, and fertility – whereas a man’s value lies in strength, resources, and maturity. The two sexes have fundamentally different dating and mating strategies, and it is ONLY though the institution of monogamous marriage, that the two sexes can meet both of their most profound needs through a mutually equitable exchange.

The man trades his resources and protection for the woman’s fertility and the chance to pass on his genetic inheritance. It is that simple.

Modern feminism has profoundly and severely corrupted this exchange, by pretending that women are equal to men, and thereby have the right and the ability to indulge in the same mating strategies as men. This is patently untrue, and it has led to the devastation of Western civilisation – though, we must be resolutely fair and point out that such a shift could NEVER have happened without male cooperation and acquiescence.

Feminism succeeded in the West because we men let it. We supported it. And we are now paying the price for our ancestors’ lack of foresight and sensibility.

In fact, the problems that our friend describes above, have in fact been around for FAR longer than 2,000 years. If you want to read a thoroughly modern send-up of feminism, go read Lysistrata by Aristophanes, which is every bit as relevant today as it was 2,400 years ago. Indeed, if you look at the history of the ancient Spartans, that society of citizen-soldiers collapsed in the end, because they could not produce enough Spartiates to replace the ones lost in battle.

That is the same situation that faces us today with the rise of sexbots.

When I started writing on the subject, back in about 2014-15, I figured the technology required to make realistic sex robots was still decades away. Boy, was I ever wrong. With the advent of Generative AI, one can create a reasonable simulacrum of a human woman that performs about 80% of her functions, without that weird “Uncanny Valley” effect, and that technology is here NOW.

On top of the collapse of feminism and female power that our friend predicts, I think we will also see an even greater bifurcation of male society from what it is today. A very substantial portion of the population will resort to buying and maintaining sex robots, and will check out of the dating market entirely. And a concentrated proportion of men – perhaps the top 10-20% – will be fighting off women with a stick.

This means that eventually, OnlyFools, and sites like it, will collapse.

Think about it. Why would a man want to pay US$20-30 a month, which comes to about US$240-360 a year, and in many cases THOUSANDS of dollars a year, for ephemeral digital contact with an e-thot with perfect breasts and an Instagram-filtered face on her explicit videos, when he can spend the same or less, straight-line amortised over 10 years, on a sex robot that is real, tangible, and in his own bedroom?

The answer is obvious. And that represents a market crash of a kind we have never seen before, just waiting to happen.

Women will therefore need to adapt and give men what they always should have in the first place: companionship, love, sex, loyalty, and honour. Most importantly, they MUST give men children that he knows for certain are his, and must raise them under his protection.

Without that, in a world where a man can buy a sex robot that looks, sounds, and acts exactly like Amouranthe, but never sags, ages, has a period, or goes berserk for no reason… what need is there for an actual woman?

Most non-Christian men in a post-secular society will take the sex robot over the woman, ANY DAY AND THREE TIMES ON A SUNDAY.

Whether women will actually CHANGE, of course, is an entirely different question. I think we are about to find out. But I do not think the consequences for wider society will be easy to predict – or to contain.