A reporter from the Bolshevik Broadcasting Company in PommieBastardLand goes to Russia and meets with a married Russian Orthodox priest and his wife. The ensuing exchange really has to be seen in its entirety to be believed:
Several things jump out from that video.
First – it is obvious that the reporter, Ms. Wossname, is probably of Russian extraction, judging by her features and considerable good looks – and the fact that she seems to understand Russian perfectly well but does not seem to be very keen on speaking it.
Given how atrocious her English accent is, I am rather grateful that she does not torture the Russian language as well. I have heard Russian described (rather accurately, it must be said) as “drunk people falling down stairs” when spoken at high speed – but when you listen to really well-spoken beautifully rendered Russian, it truly is perhaps the most romantic language on Earth.
It would appear that life in Britain, one of the West’s most feminised and pozzed-out nations, has very sadly corrupted the proud Slavic heritage that is hers by birthright. It’s always a great tragedy to see a pretty girl succumb to feminism.
Second – it is equally obvious that the priest, Father Germain, is exceptionally intelligent and well read, and pretty familiar with the nonsensical ideology that is modern feminism. He clearly understands English just fine, and can speak it reasonably well – and anyone who has ever tried to learn Russian while fluent in English, or vice versa, knows full well that neither language is easy to learn.
And he clearly has absolutely no patience or regard for the silly pieties of modern feminism.
Third – there is a bit in that video where the priest says something like, “I wish for you to have a husband, who will be your lord and master, and you will be his slave and loving wife”.
The look on Ms. FemCunt’s face is absolutely priceless.
The thing is, though, that this could be a mis-translation. I wouldn’t put it past the cultural Marxist rat-bastards in charge of BBC programming to mess up the translation “accidentally on purpose”.
Turns out, he did actually say “slave”:
А вы будете его рабой и любящей женой.
The root word there is раба, literally “bondsmaid”.
So, yeah, the priest did actually say that. And the reporter is left to totally not believe that shit.
Fourth – the reason why Sargon can’t stop laughing at that video is because it is absolutely bloody hilarious to see the reactions from the British feminist’s face. She cannot believe what she is hearing. She thinks that she has taken a step backwards in time all the way to the Dark Ages.
Here is the thing, though: she does not seem to understand that a strong patriarchal husband takes on responsibility for his wife in a traditional Christian marriage. It is not that he has license to beat his wife freely – the Bible makes it perfectly clear that a husband is to love his wife, be faithful to her, accept her for who she is, but is also her leader and lord.
As far as I know – and I am nobody’s idea of a Biblical scholar, so forgive my ignorance if I get it wrong – the New Testament does not sanction wife-beating.
Let me be as clear as I possibly can be on one particular point: I do NOT agree with the good priest there about husbands “disciplining” their wives through physical force. A certain misbegotten member of my extended family was a wife-beater; all I will say about him is that he got his richly deserved rewards over the course of a wasted and miserable life. Beating one’s wife does not make one a man or a husband; all too often, it merely makes one a bully, pushing around the weak through dint of nothing more than sheer physical strength.
Husbands should not beat their wives.
And wives bloody well should not be feminists.
I do not have much respect for men who beat their wives. But, I have to say, I have even less respect for feminists. And if I had to choose between the lesser of two great evils, I’d pick the Russian Orthodox priest’s side, any day of the week and twice on Sundays.
1 Comment
Didact,
You're right that the Bible doesn't sanction it. In fact St Paul is quite explicit in that famous letter of his. Jesus preached the Sermon on the Mount which can have a reading of protecting women (and widows) via blessed are the weak and his admonition to protect them in other parables.
xavier