For decades, mainstream Western academia has argued that the period between the 8th and 11th centuries, thereabouts, constituted a “Golden Age” of Izzlam, wherein the Muslim parts of the world flourished and generated incredible innovations in mathematics, science, literature, architecture, and political science. The problem is that, as with so much about Izzlamick history, this is at best fanciful myth – and at worst outright total nonsense, as Dr. Raymond Ibrahim (who is, as far as I can tell, a Coptic Christian whose family originated from Egypt) points out in some detail:

It is of vital importance for people in the West to understand the extent to which Izzlamick history has been falsified over the centuries. This starts with the very basics – right with Mo’Lester the Paedophile Profit (Police and Lawsuits Be Upon Him). I do not have time to get into it here – you can look up the archives of this site for much more extensive information, or you can watch Dr. Jay Smith’s videos over at the Pfander Films channel on EWCHOOB – but every single aspect of Izzlamick history that we were taught in schools, is effectively a falsehood, a redaction from later centuries to fit the time and place required of a religion of Bedouin Arabs.

Simply put, the Muhammad of the Izzlamick religion NEVER EXISTED, as depicted in the classical sources. There never was such a man – and here, by the way, Dr. Ibrahim takes a completely different view, and disagrees strongly with Dr. Jay Smith on this subject. But I maintain that Dr. Smith’s line is correct, simply because he disproved a while back, using the works of far more learned scholars than himself, who looked at the contemporary source material, that there never was a city called Mecca, as described in the sources.

Now, note what I am saying here. I AM NOT saying that there never was a warlord who united Arab tribes and turned himself into a combined statesman and religious figure. There probably was such a character, and there probably did arise some serious mythology around him, to suit the needs of a nascent empire. But that man, whoever he was, absolutely was not a Muslim as we understand it today. Assuming he existed, he was almost certainly a Monophysite Gnostic heretic, arising out of the Lakhmid and Ghassanid kingdoms that gained power and influence in the wake of the brutal Byzantine-Sassanian wars of the 6th and early 7th centuries.

Put another way, the Muhammad of faith and the Muhammad of history are two very different people. The former never existed. The latter probably did.

The same is true of the Izzlamick empires that arose following Mo’Lester’s supposed conquests of Arabia and the Levant. The first such empire, the Ummayyads, were Gnostic Christians to the core, as their own coinage points out. The second, the Abbasids, were thoroughly Persian in character, and had a very different, much more philosophical and rationalist approach to faith – which is where we get the Sunni-Shi’a divide that exists today.

And the same is absolutely true of the Izzlamick “Golden Age” that supposedly came about while the rest of Europe languished in darkness.

The standard version of history says that the Dark Ages descended on Europe following the Fall of the Roman Empire in 476 AD, and they lasted for almost 500 years, until the start of the Middle Ages. But this is absolutely false, as we now know.

In reality, as Emmet Scott points out in his superb book, Mohammed and Charlemagne Revisited, that period of history was nowhere near as bad as everyone thinks. The Visigothic kingdoms around Rome took up the mantle of the Empire that had disappeared, and continued along its previous course. The ordinary people barely recognised that anything had changed.

In fact, the true Dark Ages started much later – in the mid-7th Century. And the root cause of those Dark Ages, was IZZLAM.

Specifically, it was the rise of the Ummayyad Empire in the Levant, which cut off the flows of Egyptian papyrus and grain, and African red slip pottery, that plunged Europe into a true Dark Age of illiteracy.

Meanwhile, the supposed “Izzlamick Golden Age”, was actually nothing of the sort. Whether we are talking about the supposed Andalusian Paradise in Cordoba – where supposedly there existed city of half a million people under the earth, which would have rivalled Rome in its heyday – or the supposed advancement of science and technology under the Abbasids, the evidence just is not there. The archaeological evidence from Andalusia says that Cordoba was much smaller and much less advanced than anyone today supposes. The contemporary sources tell us that the conviviencia was largely a myth.

Indeed, we now know today that ideas like pogroms and inquisitions did not get their starts in contemporary Christian Europe. They started in Andalusia, under MUSLIM rule, as a way to keep the Jewish and Christian dhimmi populations in line. For more on this subject, read The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise, or The Legacy of Jihad.

I could go on about this for a very long time – and I have before, on numerous occasions. But suffice to say for now that everything you think you know about Izzlam, from mainstream sources at least, is anything from a myth to a lie.

This is worth keeping in mind as we watch Muslims attaining high office in Western countries. They serve a lie. They worship a false moon-god and a man who was absolutely a rapist, paedophile, war-monger, caravan-robber, philanderer, polygamist, and delusional psychotic, according to their own sources. Their religion does not stand up to even the most cursory logical probing. And their response to criticism is always the same: they call for death to their critics, and especially to their apostates.

Under normal circumstances, any sane nation would outlaw the practice of such barbarism instantly. We are not in normal circumstances. We live in cucked-out Churchian countries that have lost their balls and spines.

That must change, and soon, if we have any hope of preserving Western European Christian civilisation.

The day must come when Reconquista 2.0 takes place, and the Jews and Muslims who refuse to recant their blasphemy against Christ, will be forced to convert or emigrate – we are better than both in that respect, as we do not call for the deaths of those who disbelieve. But that, ultimately, is the only choice we have – because they will leave us with no other.