<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Show us your Bobas	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Defence of the Mantle of Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 05:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Kapios		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5961</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kapios]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2021 05:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=10913#comment-5961</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5957&quot;&gt;Didact&lt;/a&gt;.

I had no clue about the black man of steel rumours. I stopped watching DC movies and t.v series a long time ago. I only watch the animated movies, but I&#039;m not sure how long it will take them to catch the SJW bug. They already ruined they teen titans animated series unfortunately.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5957">Didact</a>.</p>
<p>I had no clue about the black man of steel rumours. I stopped watching DC movies and t.v series a long time ago. I only watch the animated movies, but I&#8217;m not sure how long it will take them to catch the SJW bug. They already ruined they teen titans animated series unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Didact		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5957</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Didact]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2021 17:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=10913#comment-5957</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5956&quot;&gt;Kapios&lt;/a&gt;.

&lt;blockquote&gt;Never completely understood the archetypes in different alphabet letters if I’m honest.

There is alpha, sigma, beta, gamma and omega? I get that there is a certain cluster of behaviours that make up an archetype, but it’s confusing for people who don’t know the jargon. I prefer Chad vs. Simp. Makes things much simpler.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I understand why you make this point, and I even agree with you, to some extent. The problem with a binary Chad-Simp approach, though, is that it ignores two key facts about the Socio-Sexual Hierarchy:
1) Chad-Simp is a &lt;i&gt;sexual&lt;/i&gt; hierarchy, whereas the &lt;i&gt;social&lt;/i&gt; hierarchy is more complex and nuanced;
2) The Chad-Simp breakdown does not permit for fractal understandings of male behaviour. Consider that Benny Shapiru, a Gamma, lost face in front of Little Nicky Titty Baby Fuentes, also a Gamma. But in relative terms, in the world of Gammas, Nick Fuentes is a higher ranked character than Ben Shapiro. A Chad-Simp approach could never capture this nuance.

&lt;blockquote&gt;A far as Hollyweird goes, most of these archaic studios will die eventually. The actors who used to depend on them are now making a living as producers and actors and they can pretty much promote and get investment without those studios if they wanted.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I agree. It&#039;s already happening, and it&#039;s beautiful to watch. Did you see the latest movie rumours about a Superman reboot featuring a Black Man of Steel? That is going to go over at the box office like a plate of cold sick.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5956">Kapios</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>Never completely understood the archetypes in different alphabet letters if I’m honest.</p>
<p>There is alpha, sigma, beta, gamma and omega? I get that there is a certain cluster of behaviours that make up an archetype, but it’s confusing for people who don’t know the jargon. I prefer Chad vs. Simp. Makes things much simpler.</p></blockquote>
<p>I understand why you make this point, and I even agree with you, to some extent. The problem with a binary Chad-Simp approach, though, is that it ignores two key facts about the Socio-Sexual Hierarchy:<br />
1) Chad-Simp is a <i>sexual</i> hierarchy, whereas the <i>social</i> hierarchy is more complex and nuanced;<br />
2) The Chad-Simp breakdown does not permit for fractal understandings of male behaviour. Consider that Benny Shapiru, a Gamma, lost face in front of Little Nicky Titty Baby Fuentes, also a Gamma. But in relative terms, in the world of Gammas, Nick Fuentes is a higher ranked character than Ben Shapiro. A Chad-Simp approach could never capture this nuance.</p>
<blockquote><p>A far as Hollyweird goes, most of these archaic studios will die eventually. The actors who used to depend on them are now making a living as producers and actors and they can pretty much promote and get investment without those studios if they wanted.</p></blockquote>
<p>I agree. It&#8217;s already happening, and it&#8217;s beautiful to watch. Did you see the latest movie rumours about a Superman reboot featuring a Black Man of Steel? That is going to go over at the box office like a plate of cold sick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Kapios		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5956</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kapios]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=10913#comment-5956</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Never completely understood the archetypes in different alphabet letters if I&#039;m honest.

There is alpha, sigma, beta, gamma and omega? I get that there is a certain cluster of behaviours that make up an archetype, but it&#039;s confusing for people who don&#039;t know the jargon. I prefer Chad vs. Simp. Makes things much simpler.

Shapiro is a simp and William Lane Craig is a Chad. I think Shapiro had William in one of his podcast. He won the debate because Hitchens underestimated him, and because he knows how to connect different topics without making the viewer feel lost.

Shapiro talks fast and he injects some truth to his statements, which makes him look smart, but after seeing both, there is no denying who is true leader who can inspire people.

A far as Hollyweird goes, most of these archaic studios will die eventually. The actors who used to depend on them are now making a living as producers and actors and they can pretty much promote and get investment without those studios if they wanted.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never completely understood the archetypes in different alphabet letters if I&#8217;m honest.</p>
<p>There is alpha, sigma, beta, gamma and omega? I get that there is a certain cluster of behaviours that make up an archetype, but it&#8217;s confusing for people who don&#8217;t know the jargon. I prefer Chad vs. Simp. Makes things much simpler.</p>
<p>Shapiro is a simp and William Lane Craig is a Chad. I think Shapiro had William in one of his podcast. He won the debate because Hitchens underestimated him, and because he knows how to connect different topics without making the viewer feel lost.</p>
<p>Shapiro talks fast and he injects some truth to his statements, which makes him look smart, but after seeing both, there is no denying who is true leader who can inspire people.</p>
<p>A far as Hollyweird goes, most of these archaic studios will die eventually. The actors who used to depend on them are now making a living as producers and actors and they can pretty much promote and get investment without those studios if they wanted.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Scavos		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5955</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Scavos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2021 14:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=10913#comment-5955</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Reading Point 2, one of Mark Twain&#039;s quotes came to mind: &quot;Don&#039;t argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading Point 2, one of Mark Twain&#8217;s quotes came to mind: &#8220;Don&#8217;t argue with an idiot. They will drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Didact		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5953</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Didact]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2021 12:20:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=10913#comment-5953</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5945&quot;&gt;Matt FreeMatt&lt;/a&gt;.

Indeed. Which is ironic given that Nick himself is something of a Gamma. It&#039;s interesting to note how far down the Socio-Sexual Hierarchy extends as a fractal concept.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5945">Matt FreeMatt</a>.</p>
<p>Indeed. Which is ironic given that Nick himself is something of a Gamma. It&#8217;s interesting to note how far down the Socio-Sexual Hierarchy extends as a fractal concept.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Matt FreeMatt		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/show-us-your-bobas.html#comment-5945</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Matt FreeMatt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Feb 2021 00:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=10913#comment-5945</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Two things: Dropkick Murphys said: (from The Gauntlet)
They&#039;re gonna come when you&#039;re not ready
When you&#039;re not to well-prepared
They&#039;re gonna prey upon your weakness no man&#039;s soul is ever spared
You&#039;ve got to stand up, yeah, and fight them
Show them what it&#039;s all about this man is not for sale there will be no backing down

Stand up and fight and I&#039;ll stand up with you!
We shall succeed
Stand up and fight and I&#039;ll stand up with you!

Also, yeah I wouldnt put Shapiro in my corner. Hides behind bodyguards and couldnt deal with Nick Fuentes.
Almost a calibrating stereotype]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two things: Dropkick Murphys said: (from The Gauntlet)<br />
They&#8217;re gonna come when you&#8217;re not ready<br />
When you&#8217;re not to well-prepared<br />
They&#8217;re gonna prey upon your weakness no man&#8217;s soul is ever spared<br />
You&#8217;ve got to stand up, yeah, and fight them<br />
Show them what it&#8217;s all about this man is not for sale there will be no backing down</p>
<p>Stand up and fight and I&#8217;ll stand up with you!<br />
We shall succeed<br />
Stand up and fight and I&#8217;ll stand up with you!</p>
<p>Also, yeah I wouldnt put Shapiro in my corner. Hides behind bodyguards and couldnt deal with Nick Fuentes.<br />
Almost a calibrating stereotype</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
