I hope you are doing well man. Man I about the podcast we did and how much change afterwards.

Anyway I have question and this is more in regards to intelligence, marriage and North East Asian Males. Do you think there is such a thing as over thinking it in terms of getting marry and having children. The reason pointed to NE Asian males is in part due to their low birth rates, which of course has a number of factors. But I must say one thing I notice with a lot of NE Asians is the low risk taking and concern about all sort of future possibilities. If we simply looked at IQ Asia should be ahead of the West in terms of innovation but it isn’t, I put it in part of the reason of bell curve being narrower but also the ideas of not rocking the boat.
How this relates to the birth rate and marriage for NE Asian and I might add European countries beside Western (Britain, Germany, France) , is that they are doing marriage wrong for their people. Post WW2, these nation have taken a western view on relationship and it doesn’t work for them, better would be the old ways of arrange marriages, not because some individuals can not sort themselves but the collective as a whole can not, since the ideas is built for a different set of people. The average Chinese, Japanese, and Korean man and woman is more lost today. If they went back to Parents organizing their marriages (in the case of China ban sex selected abortions), they would be more healthier and the men would be less stuck in their own heads, the females less bombard with choices. Add that if girls get taught that beaty disappears, would make them less likely to want to leave the man.
Even in Europe, those ideas are Western and more towards the Anglo-Saxons, what might work in England, doesn’t work for Italy and work even less so in Eastern Europe, yet we try to fit a squad into a circle. Anyway just a thought.

Permissive …

Daemon-possessed or had it up to here with Weimar, German humiliation, and his civilization going to hell (all courtesy of the Jews or their catpaws)? That kind of rage and hatred is capable of being naturally provoked in men, no daemonic possession required. The fates of Carthage and the Khwarazmian empire were both brought about by raw, provoked, & human fury.

Factor in Hitler being the Ur-Gamma and daemonic possession seems even less likely. Like many Viking berserkers (and their descendants) Hitler quite literally had it in him.

As for the war crimes of Hitler against the slavs yes they were evil (and idiotic). Yet in comparison to the other two members of WW2 trinity of evil Hitler is small potatoes. Both Stalin and Mao achieved higher death counts just by breathing. Neither one produced the good that Hitler did either (notice that Hitler actively reversed cultural/moral decay, Stalin & especially Mao meanwhile destroyed the old to make way
for the new).

The two counterpoints to all of this are simple:

Look at Hitler’s eyes in the available video footage. They are very clearly the eyes of a man who is daemon-possessed.

And look at what the Wehrmacht and SS, under Hitler’s express orders, did on the Eastern Front to the civilian population. Watch the ending scenes from Иди и Смотри (Come and See), if you can stomach them. That is a sanitised version of what the Germans did to the populations of Belarus, Ukraine, and western Russia.

Also, even if Hitler had not micromanaged the Eastern Front, and had let von Manstein and his fellow generals get on with things, they still would have lost. Hitler himself (supposedly) said later in the war that if he had known the USSR was capable of producing 20,000 tanks a year, he never would have invaded. The veracity of that quote is highly debatable, but there is no doubt that the Nazis severely underestimated what the Soviets were capable of doing.

Queen Isabella represents the harshest response to Judaism ever seen in Pre-Hitler (and post-Roman Pagan) Western Civilization. There are only two solutions to the Jewish question, complete deportation or complete annihilation. Hitler saw this clearly (and don’t try the “but he started killing the poor Jews first” card, Hitler tried deportation first, the Jews ironically fucked that over) and was willing to do what was required to enact either option.

Contrast this to the legions of Christian European Nobles and Kings who set the Jews loose upon their population as predatory tax farmers and money lenders. Among Christian monarchs/greater nobility the only ones I can find who ordered anything even remotely close to COMPLETE expulsions are Queen Isabella/Ferdinand, Edward I, Philip IV, Charles VI, Manuel I, Grand Duke Alexander, & Duke Albert V. Note that even these so-called “COMPLETE” expulsions allowed for voluntary or forced conversions, as can be seen in the conversio problems this allowed the Jewish weeds to grow back.

This puts Hitler squarely on the level of some of Europe’s best royalty and nobility in terms of morality, add in what he did for the real German population (i.e. not Jews, Frogs, Poles, etc) and he was better than many Christian Kings & Queens. His true failings weren’t on the moral level, they were on the military level (not allowing the Eastern Front Generals to achieve victory over the Soviet Union by micromanaging them) and diplomatic level (declaring war on the USA was genuinely retarded, as was treating the Slavs like they were Jews; spoiler alert: the Jews abused the Slavs real bad to).

P.S: The various local Jewish expulsions (which do number in the 1000s) by various petty nobles, peasant mobs, and several clergymen do not matter one micron. As noble and correct as their actions were if you don’t uproot the entire weed of Judaism it just grows back. Half-measures may as well be nothing in the grand scheme of things.

shrug How far does a language have to drift before it is no longer considered the same language? Brazilian Portuguese and argentinian Spanish are most certainly considered different languages, even though they can make themselves understood.

What I am saying is that the language we speak in America is almost entirely distinct from West London English, to the point of incomprehensibility, nearly the same as that between Portuguese and Spanish. And yes, I grew up in Appalachia, and Creole English is virtually unrecognizable.

My point stands. In london, being pissed means being drunk. Here, it means being righteously angry. That is a strong clue that not only accent, but English itself has drifted regionally, as it is prone to do, to the point where we are speaking similar but different languages.

not only do we speak English, most of our regional dialects can still be found extant within the British Isles.

to the extent that we no longer conform to modern British type pronounciation and idioms, this is largely due to the rise of Received Pronounciation amongst the upper crusts of Brit society and actors / news talking heads who ape them.

in the US, it was the Midwestern Accent which was adopted by news presenters as it is generally viewed as one of the least distinctive of the regional dialects as well as tending towards better intelligability by most other dialects.

i had a foreman from the Deep South years back, i literally asked him to repeat an instruction to me a half dozen times to me one day. couldn’t make out what he was saying for the life of me.

and i grew up in Florida.

claiming that the US “doesn’t speak English” has as much basis as saying that Aussies and South Africans don’t speak English.

We’ll see. Supposedly, Activision is setting up an entirely separate team for HALO 7, but given Microslop is still involved at the top, I doubt any of this will be good.