<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Well that&#8217;s us told, then	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Defence of the Mantle of Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 01:39:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Randale6		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9754</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randale6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2025 01:39:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=22429#comment-9754</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9753&quot;&gt;LTC (Ret.) Thomas Kratman&lt;/a&gt;.

The South Was Right, notice that General Lee&#039;s predictions of what the Union would morph into have come to pass. Even now your people are being displaced in your own lands (as you were born in the people&#039;s republic of Massachusetts I must qualify you as a yankee), often by the very beings you sought to liberate. Yankees may have won the physical war but the price has been your souls and ethnos. We have still retained ours, despite your best efforts to exterminate it.

Trump is not simply being obtuse, he is being stupid. He loses nothing by being blunt, yet he engages in lies for no conceivable benefit. And before you go all QAnon on me remember how that all worked out in 2020.

As for the question of the Jews I invite you to ponder a saying of fairly recent vintage, &quot;to learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.&quot; You may criticize the nigger, the spic, the Chinaman, the raghead, and many, many others. Yet the second you criticize the Jews...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9753">LTC (Ret.) Thomas Kratman</a>.</p>
<p>The South Was Right, notice that General Lee&#8217;s predictions of what the Union would morph into have come to pass. Even now your people are being displaced in your own lands (as you were born in the people&#8217;s republic of Massachusetts I must qualify you as a yankee), often by the very beings you sought to liberate. Yankees may have won the physical war but the price has been your souls and ethnos. We have still retained ours, despite your best efforts to exterminate it.</p>
<p>Trump is not simply being obtuse, he is being stupid. He loses nothing by being blunt, yet he engages in lies for no conceivable benefit. And before you go all QAnon on me remember how that all worked out in 2020.</p>
<p>As for the question of the Jews I invite you to ponder a saying of fairly recent vintage, &#8220;to learn who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.&#8221; You may criticize the nigger, the spic, the Chinaman, the raghead, and many, many others. Yet the second you criticize the Jews&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LTC (Ret.) Thomas Kratman		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9753</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LTC (Ret.) Thomas Kratman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2025 20:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=22429#comment-9753</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The south was both wrong and idiotic.  Moreover, there were only two possibilities.  1) Secession was unconstitutional and the constitution allowed the suppression of it as rebellion.  2)  Secession was constitutional and the south properly formed a sovereign nation.  In this case, the equally sovereign United States was perfectly within its rights to attack and extinguish it.  And, no, given the land grab the south dragged us into with Mexico, they had zero moral right to object to a war of conquest.  There are no other possibilities.

And your judgment of what qualifies someone to be properly addressed indicates you are the same.

Yes, Trump has been obtuse.  That&#039;s sometimes his way.  Seems to work for him reasonably well, over the long haul.  Once again, I commend that you at least try to think.  Yes, yes; I know; it&#039;s very hard and doesn&#039;t come naturally to you.

What the fuck do you imagine the fact that either or both of those scum were Jews has to do with anything you or I have previously said.  What&#039;s your problem; that a Jew fucked your mommy and now your obsessed with them?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The south was both wrong and idiotic.  Moreover, there were only two possibilities.  1) Secession was unconstitutional and the constitution allowed the suppression of it as rebellion.  2)  Secession was constitutional and the south properly formed a sovereign nation.  In this case, the equally sovereign United States was perfectly within its rights to attack and extinguish it.  And, no, given the land grab the south dragged us into with Mexico, they had zero moral right to object to a war of conquest.  There are no other possibilities.</p>
<p>And your judgment of what qualifies someone to be properly addressed indicates you are the same.</p>
<p>Yes, Trump has been obtuse.  That&#8217;s sometimes his way.  Seems to work for him reasonably well, over the long haul.  Once again, I commend that you at least try to think.  Yes, yes; I know; it&#8217;s very hard and doesn&#8217;t come naturally to you.</p>
<p>What the fuck do you imagine the fact that either or both of those scum were Jews has to do with anything you or I have previously said.  What&#8217;s your problem; that a Jew fucked your mommy and now your obsessed with them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randale6		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9752</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randale6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 17:15:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=22429#comment-9752</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9751&quot;&gt;LTC (Ret.) Thomas Patrick Kratman&lt;/a&gt;.

Oh please, Epstein is a Jew of a completely unremarkable origins who was thrust into the highest echelons of wallstreet. Ghislaine meanwhile can claim not just Judaism but direct Mossad lineage. It walks like a Jew, it kibitz&#039;s like a Jew, and it is a Jew. Mossad/Israeli/Jews (all the same really when you consider the insane level of Jewish in-group preference) are the ones who cooked it.

Secondly if Trump has indeed said that the list is cooked he has done so in the most obtuse manner possible. MAGA zealotry is such that if he said &quot;guys, the ****ers cooked it while Biden was in office&quot; it would be parroted throughout the land. No one can honestly claim that Trump isn&#039;t a master propagandist either. Yet Trump instead chose to call Epstein&#039;s list a &quot;hoax&quot;...

Last but certainly not least I shall only call you sir when you admit the following: The South Was Right.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9751">LTC (Ret.) Thomas Patrick Kratman</a>.</p>
<p>Oh please, Epstein is a Jew of a completely unremarkable origins who was thrust into the highest echelons of wallstreet. Ghislaine meanwhile can claim not just Judaism but direct Mossad lineage. It walks like a Jew, it kibitz&#8217;s like a Jew, and it is a Jew. Mossad/Israeli/Jews (all the same really when you consider the insane level of Jewish in-group preference) are the ones who cooked it.</p>
<p>Secondly if Trump has indeed said that the list is cooked he has done so in the most obtuse manner possible. MAGA zealotry is such that if he said &#8220;guys, the ****ers cooked it while Biden was in office&#8221; it would be parroted throughout the land. No one can honestly claim that Trump isn&#8217;t a master propagandist either. Yet Trump instead chose to call Epstein&#8217;s list a &#8220;hoax&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>Last but certainly not least I shall only call you sir when you admit the following: The South Was Right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LTC (Ret.) Thomas Patrick Kratman		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9751</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LTC (Ret.) Thomas Patrick Kratman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 05:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=22429#comment-9751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9749&quot;&gt;Randale6&lt;/a&gt;.

Well, had you bothered to think about it, yourself, you might have realized that it probably isn&#039;t possible to determine &lt;em&gt;who&lt;/em&gt; cooked it, in the first place, and had you been paying attention, you might have noticed that he IS saying that, in the second.

Paying attention and thinking; I commend both to you.

Oh, and the proper form of address in your case when addressing me is &quot;sir.&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9749">Randale6</a>.</p>
<p>Well, had you bothered to think about it, yourself, you might have realized that it probably isn&#8217;t possible to determine <em>who</em> cooked it, in the first place, and had you been paying attention, you might have noticed that he IS saying that, in the second.</p>
<p>Paying attention and thinking; I commend both to you.</p>
<p>Oh, and the proper form of address in your case when addressing me is &#8220;sir.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Randale6		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9749</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Randale6]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 16:24:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=22429#comment-9749</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9748&quot;&gt;LTC (Ret.) Thomas Kratman&lt;/a&gt;.

This ignores one thing Kratman, if this was truly the case all Trump would have to do to sweep it under the rug is... Tell his supporters that Biden&#039;s handlers cooked the list, for one the majority of them would believe it. Secondly his political enemies and their supporters would never believe what he says anyway, so no losses by saying the list was cooked.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9748">LTC (Ret.) Thomas Kratman</a>.</p>
<p>This ignores one thing Kratman, if this was truly the case all Trump would have to do to sweep it under the rug is&#8230; Tell his supporters that Biden&#8217;s handlers cooked the list, for one the majority of them would believe it. Secondly his political enemies and their supporters would never believe what he says anyway, so no losses by saying the list was cooked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LTC (Ret.) Thomas Kratman		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2025/07/well-thats-us-told-then.html#comment-9748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LTC (Ret.) Thomas Kratman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Jul 2025 11:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=22429#comment-9748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So the Epstein file.  None of it makes sense unless...
Crossposted from Sarah the Hoyt&#039;s page:
There is another possibility.  This is that, while there is (and there surely is) an Epstein file, it was so corrupted by either Epstein, himself, or one or more of his handlers (Soros, perhaps), that it is of no probative value, in the first place, and may falsely implicate perfectly innocent people, in the second.
&quot;Perfectly innocent people&quot;?  Yeah.  Works like this, maybe; let us imagine that the John Roberts who flew to Epstein&#039;s Island is, in fact, the current Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.    Yes, I chose him as an example for a reason.  He&#039;s there on the island and an extremely cute, &lt;em&gt;extremely&lt;/em&gt; cute, girl who is fifteen but looks rather older is chatting him up.  She&#039;s having a drink which her appearance says she can have.   Under some pretext or other - maybe she suddenly feels ill - she gets Roberts to escort her to the general vicinity of the little drunk hookers room.
All that is videotaped.  But the next scene in the video is same girl schlom-schlom- schlomming the schlong of some white dude - you never see his face though, of course, now it could be AI&#039;d in - of the same build as Roberts.  Or maybe it&#039;s done through image intensification, which is not especially clear, with someone who does look enough like Roberts in the grainy, green light.
Enough to convict?  Maybe.  Enough to convict in the New York Times, WAPO, and Boston Globe?  Hell, yes.
Now imagine further that there are hundreds of these cases.  Some may be guilty, others innocent, and you cannot tell the difference.
Ah, but written files.  Oh, puhleeze; those are even easier to forge, when they&#039;re your own files.
So Bondi says that to Trump: &quot;I cannot tell who is and is not guilty.  I can tell you that I do not believe some of these are guilty because they&#039;re fucking GAY but are shown with a girl.  Others I just don&#039;t know.  If I could get a conviction I am not sure that I should...&quot;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So the Epstein file.  None of it makes sense unless&#8230;<br />
Crossposted from Sarah the Hoyt&#8217;s page:<br />
There is another possibility.  This is that, while there is (and there surely is) an Epstein file, it was so corrupted by either Epstein, himself, or one or more of his handlers (Soros, perhaps), that it is of no probative value, in the first place, and may falsely implicate perfectly innocent people, in the second.<br />
&#8220;Perfectly innocent people&#8221;?  Yeah.  Works like this, maybe; let us imagine that the John Roberts who flew to Epstein&#8217;s Island is, in fact, the current Chief Justice of the Supreme Court.    Yes, I chose him as an example for a reason.  He&#8217;s there on the island and an extremely cute, <em>extremely</em> cute, girl who is fifteen but looks rather older is chatting him up.  She&#8217;s having a drink which her appearance says she can have.   Under some pretext or other &#8211; maybe she suddenly feels ill &#8211; she gets Roberts to escort her to the general vicinity of the little drunk hookers room.<br />
All that is videotaped.  But the next scene in the video is same girl schlom-schlom- schlomming the schlong of some white dude &#8211; you never see his face though, of course, now it could be AI&#8217;d in &#8211; of the same build as Roberts.  Or maybe it&#8217;s done through image intensification, which is not especially clear, with someone who does look enough like Roberts in the grainy, green light.<br />
Enough to convict?  Maybe.  Enough to convict in the New York Times, WAPO, and Boston Globe?  Hell, yes.<br />
Now imagine further that there are hundreds of these cases.  Some may be guilty, others innocent, and you cannot tell the difference.<br />
Ah, but written files.  Oh, puhleeze; those are even easier to forge, when they&#8217;re your own files.<br />
So Bondi says that to Trump: &#8220;I cannot tell who is and is not guilty.  I can tell you that I do not believe some of these are guilty because they&#8217;re fucking GAY but are shown with a girl.  Others I just don&#8217;t know.  If I could get a conviction I am not sure that I should&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
