It seems that any "reasonably intelligent" Computer Program, with a good Search Function, when connected to the Internet, will come to the Inevitable conclusion that 'blacks' are stupid and violent, and 'jews' are greedy, dishonest, racist, and without morals. Does this indicate the Program(s) are Flawed? Or just really good at coming to Conclusions based upon a 'Preponderance of Evidence'?

Many other examples have been given where "AI Programs" have done seemingly (to humans) Irrational things. It seems the Developers of "AI" are not actually interested in functional "AI", but merely better methods of Data Mining/Analytics and Social Influencing for Political purposes. i.e. "Chatbots" that can be used to Influence/Steer Opinions on Social Media and 'Alternate Media' without the (human) readers knowing they are interacting with a Computer. Not a very high bar, IMO.


Came here to say that exact thing. Godspeed sir.

Baal.

The enemy loves hiding in plain sight.

Regardless – one of the problems is that you don’t know what was the training content for the AI. Some previous cases of tech companies shutting down AI, for example, correctly identifying race from a X-RAY, are the result of using too open a set of data and the inherent patterns being recognized. So if you curate and limit the training set then what is evil can be manipulated to appear neutral or even good.

This is of course the direct result of man’s primal subconscious, a dark and bloody thing at the best of times…something that inclines us to negative emotions by instinct. Yet the subconscious is not mirror uniform between men beyond this tendency to negative emotion, in some fear reigns, in others rage, lust, hunger, etc… What is striking about Loab is that it consistently shows up in roughly the same form across multiple AIs…

If we go by the simplest answer being the most likely that leaves one possibility…every single one of these AIs that throws up the Loab image are the result not of the companies behind them but (mostly, as in 80% or more of the work) the creation of one man. The proliferation of so many “different” AIs so quickly after chatgpt was released also points at this, it is highly unlikely that so many could be whipped up so quickly. It also explains the different way that Loab is depicted by “different” AI, if all these companies did was add a few tweaks of their own to the core AI to make it look like they offered an original product upon casual inspection.

Your thoughts Didact?