“We are Forerunners. Guardians of all that exists. The roots of the Galaxy have grown deep under our careful tending. Where there is life, the wisdom of our countless generations has saturated the soil. Our strength is a luminous sun, towards which all intelligence blossoms… And the impervious shelter, beneath which it has prospered.”

Suffering through Idiocracy

by | Sep 1, 2022 | Philosophy | 7 comments

If you’ve never come across one Sam Vaknin before, I assure you, it is worth your time to go and look him up. He is an extraordinarily brilliant man – his IQ is apparently somewhere around 180 (or so he says). He did a PhD thesis about – and I wish I were making this up – a “time particle” called a chronon, which he claims determines the way that time behaves as a field, and events that we perceive in time are perturbations in that field.

I have two degrees in mathematics, and I don’t understand one word of what any of that means. All I know is that he is, by every possible measure, an extraordinarily brilliant man. If you go and look him up, the list of professional publications that he has to his name, and the number of times that he has been cited for his work in physics, and in clinical psychology, is frankly STAGGERING.

He is also a diagnosed psychopath, and an extremely flawed man who has served time in jail for securities fraud, and whose first marriage (I think) failed pretty spectacularly, and whose record of failed and broken relationships in business and elsewhere is pretty appalling. He himself used to say that he is a colossal failure.

In other words, he is an extremely intelligent, extremely dangerous man.

As such, he is in an excellent position to explain to all of us what it is like being highly intelligent, in a world full of idiots:

Let us be clear about one thing: Mr. Vaknin is absolutely CORRECT about the “stupidity tax”. I did a long podcast about this a while back, when I had to live in a country run by, for, with, and of people with an average IQ across the entire nation of about 76. Living in a world full of stupidity is not fun, easy, pleasant, or healthy. In a world where you are essentially the smartest person in the room no matter where you go, it is a constant drain on your mental energies and resources to have to deal with the idiots of the world.

There are, however, a number of problems with Mr. Vaknin’s proposed “solutions” to this issue.

Let us take first his notion that being forced to listen to the idiots of this world is a form of “mental rape”. I find this a distasteful metaphor, and that is putting it rather mildly. The reality is that if you don’t want to be forced to listen to someone’s opinion, then you can simply walk away. There are more ways than ever to tune such things out. You cannot escape a rapist anywhere nearly so easily – violation of your body (and spirit) is not comparable to listening to someone’s inanities.

Second, we must always keep in mind that, to Mr. Vaknin, EVERYONE is a moron.

Take Our Beloved and Dreaded Supreme Dark Lord (PBUH) Voxemort the Most Malevolent and Terrible. As he often reminds us, he is a literal superintelligence. His IQ is at least 150. This makes him considerably more intelligent than me, and it makes the gap between him and the average human almost incomprehensibly large in terms of intelligence.

That gap is larger than the gap between the average human and a functional retard. Think about the stupidest person you know that is still a functional human being, and then compare him to yourself.

That is how OBADSDL(PBUH) sees YOU.

Mr. Vaknin has an IQ – so he claims – of 180. IF TRUE, that means OBADSDL(PBUH) looks like a functional moron, to HIM.

The point of this aside is to show you just how far outside of “normal” people like Mr. Vaknin are. There are very few of them in the world. Inevitably, they probably see the rest of us more or less like drooling imbeciles.

A world built and designed around them, therefore, will by definition be unlivable for the ordinary man, just as a world designed and built for the functionally retarded would be unbearable for the average man too.

This leads us on to the third point, which comes from what Mr. Vaknin said about being forced to listen to people without the knowledge base or qualifications to speak intelligently on any given matter. This presupposes that intelligence and qualifications go together. In my experience, and in the experience of most of my readers, the exact opposite is true – the more qualified you are, the dumber your worldview tends to be. (This is not, of course, a hard and fast rule – I will happily put my own qualifications up against any knock-kneed Ivy League dork, and I assure you that in most cases my qualifications match or exceed theirs. Qualifications have absolutely nothing to do with quality, in my experience.)

Mr. Vaknin appears to build toward an argument that only the most intelligent, the most qualified, should be permitted to determine what the rest of us think and do and how we live. This is a recipe for utter disaster, which only a psychopath would fail to see.

I do not say this as a criticism. Psychopaths, by definition, are unable to judge moral matters, because they lack a sense of morality to begin with. As such, a psychopath cannot be expected to understand that morality has little to do with intelligence.

This is the lesson taught to us in no less a book than STARSHIP TROOPERS, easily the greatest military sci-fi novel of all time. In that book, we find many powerful lessons about the true nature of morality and governance. And one of those lessons has to do with the fact that possessing high intelligence does not automatically confer any ability to govern others. To do that, one must have “skin in the game” – and there is nothing to indicate that the highly intelligent have any more skin in the game than the stupid.

This is where Mr. Vaknin, for all of his vast and incredible brilliance, always falls down. As intelligent as he is – and he is staggeringly smart – he is still not more intelligent than tens of thousands or millions of people put together. Worse, he does not have the kind of vested interests in their lives, nations, and communities that they do.

What business, then, does someone who cannot possibly possess all of the necessary information to know “what is best”, and who does not have a vested interest in making sure that he is actually right about “what is best”, have to decide “what is best”?

Precisely none.

And that is the great downfall of the highly intelligent, relative to the highly stupid. We constantly construct for ourselves these brilliant ideas about how the world can and should run – and we inevitably run into serious problems when we try to make them work in the real world.

Ultimately, living in Idiocracy is something to which we might all have to resign ourselves, though it doesn’t have to be that way. There are ways out, for ourselves and our posterity, but only if we learn some very harsh lessons and make sure that future generations do not make the same mistakes that we and our ancestors made.

Doing so will require us to jettison a lot of nonsense assumptions and stupid ideas that we have been conditioned to accept – by, ironically enough, people of extremely high intelligence. But we must do so if we want to stall and eventually reverse the catastrophic decline in overall intelligence, and the consequent destruction of social boundaries, norms, and basic creature comforts.

Subscribe to Didactic Mind

* indicates required
Email Format

Recent Thoughts

If you enjoyed this article, please:

  • Visit the Support page and check out the ways to support my work through purchases and affiliate links;
  • Email me and connect directly;
  • Share this article via social media;


  1. randale6

    Having been through multiple “idiot serving institutions” (trying to not self dox here) I can only say this…the eugenicists were on to something. Not sure if their proposed methods are the solution though…but if we don’t do something the white (with the exception of the Slavs) and black races are doomed.

    The northeast Asians will wind up ruling this world…assuming their fertility rate can ever be reversed.

  2. Robert W

    Strangely, this video is blocked by my firewalls at work, so I can’t comment on it.

    What I do want to comment on is the range and impact of this IQ delta.
    Gap from retard to Avg = 3sd
    Gap from avg to Vox = 3sd
    Gap from Vox to Vaknin = 3sd

    That’s a minimum 6sd from the girl next door to Vaknin. That is an astonishingly lonely place to be. There’s no entertainment or games that could competently amuse, no woman who could dream of being a wife on equal terms.

    What did historical societies do with these outliers? I expect some squandered them completely but others let them drive massive utility to society. Someone like Shakespeare changed entertainment forever. Someone like Mozart moved music by a century. Someone like Aquinas towered over all his contemporaries for a century on both sides. Honestly, I can’t imagine any of these actually batting in the 180iq range, they managed relationships with their contemporaries too well.

    I don’t know this, but I speculate that civilizations where the individual thrives benefit from the outliers. The ones who harnessed those minds to the purpose of the divine benefitted the most. Should not the transcendent mind ought to best grasp the transcendent truth?

  3. Tom Kratman

    The only way to have an IQ of 180 is by using the Cattell scale, which is on a scale of 200 and uses a different standard deviation. There has simply never been a large enough sampling to go above the Wechsler or Stanford-Binet scale of 160. A 180, Cattell, by the way, is a 150 Wechsler. I, personally, am unimpressed.

    Or would be, even as I sneered, if I thought IQ measured intelligence reliably. I do not think so. I think it’s incapable – they’re all incapable – of telling the difference between intelligence and work ethic. You can’t even say for sure that they can measure idiocy well, since there are and have been people who were illiterate and innumerate who were still highly intelligent.

    • furor kek tonicus ( "fake and gay" is not redundancy, it's emphasis of the syllable )

      you are unaware that there are IQ tests which do not require literacy or numeracy?
      i’m not really surprised by that.

      • Tom Kratman

        No, I’m aware of them from a couple of mentions in the Bell Curve. What makes you think that being aware of something is the same as conceding legitimacy to that something.

        Somehow, I’m not really surprised that you can’t tell the difference.

  4. furor kek tonicus ( i demand that Biden disavow his treasonous endorsement of "Let's go, Brandon" )

    “This is a recipe for utter disaster, which only a psychopath would fail to see.”
    psycho / sociopaths are in the B Cluster.
    and all of the Cluster B neuro-deviancies have a high narcissism component. not all narcissists are Grandiose, but all narcissists WILL discount contradicting facts and opinions which do not advantage their preferences. to the harm of all those around them.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Didactic Mind Archives

Didactic Mind by Category

%d bloggers like this: