I wanted your thoughts on my second comment last week, where I found a pattern of endless whiteknighting/FI/pedestalization across seemingly unrelated or even contradictory cuckservative beliefs

To be honest, I can’t add much to the debate over what motivates cuckservatives, other than that their lack of spine comes from a distinct lack of any core belief system. The best book that I have read on the subject is, of course, Cuckservative by Our Beloved and Dreaded Supreme Dark Lord (PBUH) Vox Day the Most Malevolent and Terrible. He lays it all out there.

With respect to your view that the cuckservative’s goal is to lose, or that they will fight on the basis of white-knighting and blue-pilling, I think this is not entirely correct. You correctly diagnose the symptoms, but perhaps not the cancer that causes them.

That cancer is essentially a lack of core doctrine or belief. Conservatism, from which cuckservatism derives itself, sells itself precisely on this lack of a core doctrine. Therefore, everything that cuckservatives do is from a defensive crouch. As any military strategist – or, heck, athlete in a competitive sport – will tell you, the fastest way to get your ass beat and lose, is to fight defensively constantly. While you are busy trying to defend what you have, your enemy will change the battleground and the tactics involved, and you’ll have to abandon what you’re defending now, in order to fight them then.

This purely defensive mindset comes from the very word, “conservative”. Yet, this mindset is not Christian. We follow the example of Jesus, who was extraordinarily offensive to the Pharisees – which is but one of the reasons why they wanted him dead.

So my view is that what you see as the things that cuckservatives fight FOR, are really nothing more than the outward results of the cuckservative’s mindset and psychology, which is purely defensive and therefore cannot adapt.

I wanted your thoughts on my second comment last week, where I found a pattern of endless whiteknighting/FI/pedestalization across seemingly unrelated or even contradictory cuckservative beliefs :

Oh, I think cuckservatives do have defining principles, and things they will fight hard for. Unfortunately, every single one of these things is ridiculously whiteknighting and blue pill.

i) Cuckservatives are even more strident than the most radical feminists about making divorce laws in America even more punitive to men. Plus, they are the only ones who say men should be forced into marriage despite these laws. Most leftists are still of a view that if a man doesn’t want to do it, he doesn’t have to.

ii) Cuckservatives have chosen ‘transgenders in women’s sports’ as their hill to die on. Never once do they consider that this is the natural outcome of the ridiculous non-free-market existence of women’s sports, AND that the women themselves vote in a manner that supports this. Why shouldn’t the 700th best man in a given sport earn more money by pretending to be a woman? Suddenly, their pretend commitment to free markets is gone.

iii) As Dalrock often pointed out, the cuckservative’s highest goal is to lose, no matter how strong their position. Even if they are 99% of the way to victory, they crave loss, because they believe women are going to be impressed by them ‘taking the higher road’ and women will reward them sexually. Of course, this is exactly the opposite of how women think (women side with the winners, morals be damned). But cuckservatives think that endless surrender accrues them some heavenly points towards impressing women. In that way, cuckservatives are not much different than the Muslims who believe in ’72 virgins in heaven’.

iv) Ultra blue-pill Prager U has many videos trying to shame men into Marriage 2.0 (and it is shame, rather than enticement, because they portray negatives as positives). Tellingly, there are ZERO videos on that cuck channel telling women that being traditional is better.

v) Most of the cuckservative zeal for invading Muslim countries was under the premise that Islamic women were desperate to escape Islam, and by liberating these women, both these and other women the world over would reward these cucks with gratitude (i.e. sexual gratitude). This, of course, did not happen. I don’t know of a single US cuckservative who is married to a woman ‘liberated’ from Afghanistan or Iraq.

I could go on. But the overarching theme of cuckservatism is the most cartoonish of whiteknighting, combined with a belief that endless surrender somehow is ‘dignified’ and will impress those paragons of morality, women.