South Asia may have been much higher centuries ago, but that doesn’t help them much today.

Indeed. And, as a corollary, Whites should not have to pay for the cultural inadequacies and problems of Asian culture. Whites didn’t cause the problems that Asian societies face. They did that to themselves.

That ugly Indian woman who says she wants to shoot white people in the head is not the outlier many assume her to be.

I am sorry to say that indeed she is not. Much – not all, but much – of the South Asian community – are happy to take advantage of Western freedoms and high standards of living, but view Western laws and customs with open contempt. They despise Western freedoms and Christian ethics. They have no respect for Western ideas of “tolerance” and “diversity”. (In fairness, neither do I, but that is because I am a Christian, not in spite of it.)

They would not hesitate to sell out the West if it were to their advantage. And that is why the West must STOP importing them, immediately. The good things that America and Britain and other countries gain, in the form of doctors and engineers and so on, are vastly outweighed by the bad things that come from the negative impacts of those cultures in this society.

Which is why today, these three races have almost no human capital per capita. South Asia may have been much higher centuries ago, but that doesn’t help them much today.

Two years ago, I never thought I would have demoted South Asians down to the level of the other two. I assumed, like most white Americans, that skilled immigrants = good. They pay taxes, have no violent crime, and are more educated than the locals, so are always a net positive. But things you have written, on top of the recent proliferation of vocally extremist far-left Indians in the West, who express shockingly little gratitude for how Western countries are more prosperous than the countries of their origin, has caused me to demote South Asians to this lowest of tiers. That ugly Indian woman who says she wants to shoot white people in the head is not the outlier many assume her to be.

Their success in the West is negated by their extreme leftism in the West, IMO. Your writings were among the influences that made me arrive at this conclusion. You’re an exception, just like Thomas Sowell is an exception among blacks. But the per capita point is evident.

But in conclusion, these races have almost no human capital per capita. The key word being per capita.

I see where you are coming from, but I would hesitate to be quite so categorical about South Asians. Much of what we consider to be “modern” mathematics derives from breakthroughs made in India – right down to the concept of “zero” and the modern numbering system. The “Arabic” numerals that supposedly came from the Izzlamic empire of the 7th Century, was actually an Indian creation.

That being said, the level of cultural and scientific capital in South Asia definitely went into steep decline several hundred years ago, and has never recovered. We cannot blame White Europeans for this – the breakdowns in both Chinese and South Asian cultures began centuries before foreigners ever arrived on their shores.

On a separate note :

I tried to avoid coming to this conclusion, but it is inescapable. The conclusion is, if you take the races and ethnicities of the world (those with 50 million minimum members), there are three that have little to no human capital per capita. Again, per capita.

Blacks.
Meso-Americans and other non-mixed indigenous peoples of the Americas.
South Asians.

No human capital per capita. People with IQs above 120 are very few among these groups, and attractive woman are also vanishingly rare among pure-blood members of these groups.

These groups are very different from each other. Blacks are violent while South Asians are not. Blacks produce almost no 120+ IQ people while South Asians produce at least some fraction at that level. But the recent revelation of hard far-left proclivities among the high-IQ South Asians in the west causes me to demote them to this lowest of rungs. The extreme lack of attractive women should have been a clue (since civilizational capacity and the looks of women correlate pretty well at the racial level).

But in conclusion, these races have almost no human capital per capita. The key word being per capita.

There is too much data and trend observation for this conclusion and indictment to be untrue.

This does not mean they should not have human rights. But the people usually preventing them from having human rights is members of their own races in each case. That, too, is part of the equation.

Right on, brother. When every single business started having “senior hours” before the store opened during the lockdowns, I raged against it at every opportunity, and it wasn’t just because the boomers would clear out everything that my young family needed. People called me cold-hearted and asked “what’s wrong with helping the most vulnerable?”

My retort was generally along the lines of “any society which, in the face of limited resources, decides that out of everyone, the old people are the most important and therefore should be allocated them first, is a society which will not survive and more importantly does not DESERVE to survive. It should be ‘women with children under 12 hours.’ When the ship is going down, it’s usually the old people who get first crack at the lifeboats, right?”

Even the ones calling me cold-hearted couldn’t argue with that.