<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Monday morning Crush crunch	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/monday-morning-crush-crunch.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/monday-morning-crush-crunch.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Defence of the Mantle of Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 15:10:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: MrUNIVAC		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2021/02/monday-morning-crush-crunch.html#comment-5755</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MrUNIVAC]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2021 15:10:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://didacticmind.com/?p=10716#comment-5755</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Valentine&#039;s Day for men is like the SATs. You start the day with a perfect score and can only LOSE points depending on how you perform. I also like Adam Carolla&#039;s likening it to a roadside sobriety test where it&#039;s only possible to pass or screw up.

Faux News is best summed up by this comment from AoSHQ. What&#039;s sad is that even despite this, my (very late and overall anti-Boomer) Boomer dad can&#039;t quit it.

&quot;Fox News is a curious case. Their product is shit. It has always been shit. Even in context of the rest of our execrable cable news media, it&#039;s of noticeably lower quality.

Their people are so low-grade, that I&#039;m surprised they can finish complete sentences between Crossfit sessions and appointments with the hair stylist. It&#039;s like the cable news version of Balls&#039; Models from Zoolander.

But they&#039;ve been #1 for quite awhile, on the strength of precisely one strategy: being the only right-of-center news outlet in the United States.

Rupert Murdoch rightly perceived that he could serve up the very thinnest of gruel - a thoughtless, cheap, trashy product - and make a gazillion dollars by serving a yuuuuge and utterly ignored mass-market.

And they are knifing that golden goose right in the neck. It&#039;s bewildering.&quot;

Someone should do a study about how the children of successful people seemingly have to destroy the success of their forebears in order to not feel small. I forget where I read it, but supposedly it&#039;s always the third-generation heir that runs the business into the ground.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Valentine&#8217;s Day for men is like the SATs. You start the day with a perfect score and can only LOSE points depending on how you perform. I also like Adam Carolla&#8217;s likening it to a roadside sobriety test where it&#8217;s only possible to pass or screw up.</p>
<p>Faux News is best summed up by this comment from AoSHQ. What&#8217;s sad is that even despite this, my (very late and overall anti-Boomer) Boomer dad can&#8217;t quit it.</p>
<p>&#8220;Fox News is a curious case. Their product is shit. It has always been shit. Even in context of the rest of our execrable cable news media, it&#8217;s of noticeably lower quality.</p>
<p>Their people are so low-grade, that I&#8217;m surprised they can finish complete sentences between Crossfit sessions and appointments with the hair stylist. It&#8217;s like the cable news version of Balls&#8217; Models from Zoolander.</p>
<p>But they&#8217;ve been #1 for quite awhile, on the strength of precisely one strategy: being the only right-of-center news outlet in the United States.</p>
<p>Rupert Murdoch rightly perceived that he could serve up the very thinnest of gruel &#8211; a thoughtless, cheap, trashy product &#8211; and make a gazillion dollars by serving a yuuuuge and utterly ignored mass-market.</p>
<p>And they are knifing that golden goose right in the neck. It&#8217;s bewildering.&#8221;</p>
<p>Someone should do a study about how the children of successful people seemingly have to destroy the success of their forebears in order to not feel small. I forget where I read it, but supposedly it&#8217;s always the third-generation heir that runs the business into the ground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
