“We are Forerunners. Guardians of all that exists. The roots of the Galaxy have grown deep under our careful tending. Where there is life, the wisdom of our countless generations has saturated the soil. Our strength is a luminous sun, towards which all intelligence blossoms… And the impervious shelter, beneath which it has prospered.”

Guest Post: Did the Elites Betray Us? by The Male Brain

by | Dec 30, 2020 | Politics | 3 comments

Our good friend Dawn Pine, aka The Male Brain, wrote in with a very interesting post written from an Israeli point of view about how and why the elites that govern us have betrayed our trust and faith over the years. This is an intriguing topic because clearly the elites no longer represent the ordinary people, in virtually any nation in the Western world. (Central and Eastern Europe have some very conspicuous exceptions, like Poland, Hungary, and of course my beloved Russia.) Evidently the situation is much the same in Israel too.

As always, many thanks indeed to The Male Brain for his superb contributions to this site. He’ll be back with us in early January with plenty of diversions and entertainments for the New Year.


I recently came across an interesting study. It is a very recent one, which asks the following question: What are the long running trends (in Israel, but applicable to other western nations) of voting preferences, and what can we learn from them?

We are all feeling that the elites are “not on our side”. They support the Left (or Centre-Left in the Israeli case), and have been doing it for years now.

But was it always like that? Did it change? If it did, then when did it change?

The Author

Let’s first discuss the author of that study I referenced above – one Yonatan Berman. We are looking at one exceptional individual. His CV states that he was a graduate of Talpiot.

For those who don’t know – i.e. most people outside of Israel – this is an elite (pun not intended) program of the IDF, for recruits who have demonstrated outstanding academic ability in the sciences and leadership potential. Graduates pursue double higher education while they serve in the army, and they use their expertise to further IDF research and development in technological leadership positions.

I have met some of them. They are clearly “The best of The Best of THE BEST”. Those guys get to do almost whatever they want in the IDF. They do a double BSc in physics and mathematics,and while on breaks they do all of the various IDF combat and officer training. On top of their 3 years of mandatory service, they do an additional 6.

That wasn’t enough for him, so during his service he completed MS in Physics. After his service he got his PhD but, as I understand, he decided to focus on the economy and “public sphere”.

If you look at the pic on his website, he does not strike you as an Alpha, but I have no idea as we have no context beyond that. [He looks like your typical weedy academic – Didact]

The Premise

Let’s use Israel as a case study, since I live there and know it well. Israel is an interesting case with unique circumstances. Unlike most nations:

  • It was constantly in a state of “fight-to-the-death” conflict for its first ~25 years (Israeli-Arab conflict) of existence;
  • It was governed by a socialist party for the first 30 years of its independence;
  • Israel is almost totally isolated geographically;
  • The country has quite unique immigration patterns (80% Jews but from very different countries and cultures);
  • There is in fact NO actual separation of religion and state;

Politically, the dominance of the socialist left was gradually replaced by the dominance of the right: the Israeli Labour Party (Ha’avoda) has not won a parliamentary election since 1999, and at the time of writing, following the election in March 2020, it has only 3 out of 120 seats in the Knesset (Israeli parliament).

What is more interesting is that the center (Tel Aviv) used to vote right-centre and is now voting centre-left (by a great margin.)

As Dr. Berman writes:

This is also an indicator for an evolution in the ideological differences between left, center and right-wing parties in Israel, which were initially rather large. They became narrower over time. This is true from an economic perspective as well as from other perspectives, such as the Arab-Israeli conflict.

The Elites Turned to the Left Over the Years

The following figure, based on his analysis (which looks like a sound one) shows that the richer parts of the country (Tel Aviv) went from “Hard right” to extreme Leftism. Note how much the divide grows over the year. He does state his limitations (e.g. changes in the socio-demographic composition).

It gets worse. After controlling for all parameters (e.g. age, gender, class and so on), the “Elites” are 15% more likely to vote left. This is in a country in which the “actual left” has gone down the drain (surveys give it less than 20% of the votes).

It seems that there is a link between unemployment and right-wing voting (he states several papers for different countries). Also, keep in mind that western nations have also immigration (which in the Israeli case is limited to Jews) and exposure to globalisation (which happens here, but to a lesser extent). In the past 20 year, unemployed moved from being more “left leaning” (8% favouring the left in the 2006 elections) to the same margin favouring the right (2015 elections).

He also noticed what we have witnessed for years. University graduates are brainwashed into being Leftists (7-15% movement in favour of the Left in the last 30 years). Mind you that in Israel there are very limited dormitories, tuition is ~3,000$/year and that indoctrination is not a common practice in Israeli U and colleges. Another “no surprise” is that religious people vote Right in droves (25-40% favour the Right over the past 50 years).

What is more surprising is that the “Gender political gap” (the gap between male and female voter) is extremely minor. Only 3% difference (and sometimes way less).

(My) Conclusions

The articles end by describing some of what I’ve shown you (there is more if you wish to read, it is not long). I, after careful consideration, draft my own conclusions:

  1. There is no political response to inequality – all that talk of inequality just flies by everyone. Apart from the pro-crusaders/agitators, that is. We don’t like it, but it does not affect our vote.
  2. Religious = Right wing. Everywhere.
  3. Ashkenazi Jews lean left while Sephardic Jews lean right. Ashkenazi Jews are one of the top IQ groups in the world. Sephardic Jews are average. Elites tend to be smarter.
  4. There is no good explanation (in the article) for that Left-leaning trend of the elites. We know one possible explanation – globalism. Elites tend to be more globalist, and therefore will lean Left. [This has to do with the fact that elites tend to view themselves as “the anointed”. Dr. Thomas Sowell’s two books, Intellectuals and Society and The Vision of the Anointed, explain this concept very well – Didact].
  5. In the past it paid to be nationalist – mercantilism and capitalism were a national thing. Also, reading 19 century literature, you see how money was THAT IMPORTANT.
  6. Old Leftists use to be the people’s party (remember that the Left’s roots derived from the working class, even if they were spoiled rich kids), but are no more – for decades now.

To sum it up – elites (in Israel) moved Left because it aligns with their interests – probably. The “Long March Through the Institutions also helped, but in the end you don’t brainwash the elites. They know exactly what’s good for them. They “turned” left because it’s better for them.

Subscribe to Didactic Mind

* indicates required
Email Format

Recent Thoughts

If you enjoyed this article, please:

  • Visit the Support page and check out the ways to support my work through purchases and affiliate links;
  • Email me and connect directly;
  • Share this article via social media;



    The alt-right needs to come up with a better term to describe these people than “elite.” If they were actually elite, and not just overcredentialed Dunning-Kruger basket cases, they might have solved some of the issues that they claim to be experts in.

    I’m not creative enough for this task, but it should be something your average normie can grasp and which cuts them deeply, along the lines of “cuckservative” and “NPC.”

  2. Kapios

    On the surface they lean left, but in reality wouldn’t it be more correct to say that they operate under a completely new system? What do you call a system where you cherry pick whatever you like from both communism and capitalism? They sure as hell get all the benefits from a free economy, but they know how to impose taxes and regulations, which they are exempt from, to regular people. They like to impose religious rules, but they don’t follow them. They impose social rules, but they only abide by what’s good for them. They are trying to play god and fuck with nature and it seems there have always been elites who did that since we started forming civilizations.

    • Didact

      There is nothing new about this system. The workings of it are essentially the same as you will find in Plato’s Republic, which is basically a system of ant-like Communism led by wise, detached, enlightened “philosopher-kings”. As with everything else in politics, it all comes down to Plato against Aristotle – and, at an even more fundamental level, Satan versus God. It’s really that straightforward. Doesn’t matter what you call it or who is in charge. The results are always and everywhere the same.

      Plato apparently had no capacity to believe that his “enlightened philosopher-kings” might have their own interests and selfish motivations. That was the fatal flaw in his idea.

      As Dawn points out above, and as I’ve noted a number of times in these pages, the only way that you get a working and stable political system is if the leadership have the same interests and “skin in the game” as the ordinary people. Then, and ONLY then, does a stable political order emerge.

      Ironically, Israel was precisely such a country for a long time. The leadership came through the same tests and trials that the ordinary people did. Today, of course, that is no longer the case.

      There is no way to avoid the long-run disintegration and collapse of a system made by men, for men. Not possible. One way or another, the interests of the governors and the governed always diverge. All one can hope to do is to try to design a system that won’t collapse within three generations.

      By that measure, Israel’s political system isn’t doing well. Four elections in two years – that’s a pretty dysfunctional system close to collapse.


Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Didactic Mind Archives

Didactic Mind by Category