That's not it. That's nice, Roosh, but that's not it.

"She is projecting her own insecurities and anger and failures onto all men, blaming them for things that are her fault and hers alone …"

That's not it either.

"… she thought that she could do better in the open dating market …"

It's all about the SMV: she doesn't understand that her true place in the SMV hierarchy is considerably lower than what she believes.

Insecurities? Failures? Faults? Never happens to chicks with a Disney Princess Complex. It's all Eat/Prey/Love with them.

This is a woman who's conflicted because she gets approaches and offers from men who she doesn't understand are what her true SMV may merit.

And so we have Hypergamaniac Delusional Thot reliving an old tune …

Atlanta Rhythm Section — "Imaginary Lover"

"And real-life situations lose their thrill … imagination's unreal …" 🙂

Basically Tomi has been exposed as a liberal grifter onto the MAGA movement. She will likely double down with her criticisms instead of accepting that she beclowned herself very, very badly. It'll be a lot of fun to watch.

Of course, it also won't stop her from getting money and lavish amounts of attention from the very same "trash" men that she hates so much. The USA has a lot of such men, and it's not entirely their fault. It's the result of decades of disastrous social engineering.

EVERY supposed 'right wing' female is riding the wave of thirsty men. Tomi, Anne, Ingraham, Geller, even eventually Grisham and soon enough Mcenany, when you look at their personal and then eventually their public life, they are ALWAYS riding the Gravy Train of niche celebrity… but they will always turn back to the ogre feminism that gives them status among other women, they simply don't know any other way.

I'm very much inclined to agree with you. The best of the bunch appear to be women like McEnany, Ingraham, and Huckabee-Sanders, who have so far managed to resist the temptation to become feminists, for the most part. There's also Dr. Helen Smith, who has been remarkably consistent on the subject of men's rights for years.

But those are the very few exceptions. And Ingraham does get silly from time to time.

That is why you do not allow them to speak in church or in public forums. They cannot help but compete for female status, eventually. You must protect them from such exposure or they WILL turn, no matter how 'intelligent' or 'put together' they simulate, they are simply not leaders… ever.

Yep. Men lead. Women follow. End of discussion.

When men FAIL to lead and women have to step in – or, worse, when men LET them step in – that's when Very Bad Things generally start to happen.

Heh, yeah, Russian girls tend to have that effect ))

Thanks, I appreciate it.

pjmedia.com/drhelen/2016/03/27/why-are-millenniel-men-such-wimps-take-two-n132733

At that time Lahren was just 23.

Better Bachelor did a great job of showing us how much of her looks were outright purchased. She wasn't pretty at all in her natural state.

I hope all this blowback results in her doubling down.

They are always simply pursuing their 'niche'. But when you give them power, they always eventually become this way.

EVERY supposed 'right wing' female is riding the wave of thirsty men. Tomi, Anne, Ingraham, Geller, even eventually Grisham and soon enough Mcenany, when you look at their personal and then eventually their public life, they are ALWAYS riding the Gravy Train of niche celebrity… but they will always turn back to the ogre feminism that gives them status among other women, they simply don't know any other way.

That is why you do not allow them to speak in church or in public forums. They cannot help but compete for female status, eventually. You must protect them from such exposure or they WILL turn, no matter how 'intelligent' or 'put together' they simulate, they are simply not leaders… ever.

Almost spewed the morning joe with that one… I should have but did not see that one coming. Nice pic. Great commentary.