Your "questions" are always on the same theme: why are Indian men such blue-pill Beta cucks, and why are Indian women so ugly. It's the same thing, over and over again.

Get over it. India is what it is, and 1.4 billion of them aren't going to change anytime soon.

I told you very clearly above that constantly harping on about the same topic is not a good way to comment here. Either heed the warning, or go somewhere else.

Not one of my other commenters

Well, you have like two commenters, from what I have seen. I am effectively 50% of your commenters on the Friday T&A posts.

You don't like India and you don't much care for Indians or their women. Fine.

I have actually praised you a few times, and have repeatedly said that I actually want you to get out of India (even though that is long odds at this point). This is in stark contrast with a place like Unz.com or any PUA blog, where you would get extremely negative treatment no matter how much you insist you are different from other Indians.

You don't realize how good you have it with me.

This is not because I defend Indian women. But I don't like listening to broken records either.

Actually, I have never asked the same question twice, after an answer has been received. It is not a 'sperg' thing, but rather you are the only Indian (out of their vast numbers) who is partially red-pill about India. You can't possibly expect not to receive questions, when you are the only fair-minded Indian amongst a million IRTs. That is, unless you prefer that we learn about India from Matt Forney, SingleDudeTravel, and Unz.com.

non-war-torn parts of Central Asia (such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, etc.) are definitely better than India

I know people from those parts of the world. It's not better. Parts of them are worse, and by some distance.

You cannot compare the worst parts of Los Angeles or London to the best parts of an Indian city like Hyderabad

I didn't. I compared the worst parts of LA to Calcutta. And Hackney is not merely worse than Banjara Hills, it is worse than most of Hyderabad, and much of Calcutta as well.

San Francisco, Portland, and New York F***ing City are getting to the same point as large parts of Calcutta thanks to their refusal to deal with basic street sanitation.

Now, as for the tenor and tone of your comments in general:

Look, Johnny, I get it. We all get it. You don't like India and you don't much care for Indians or their women. Fine. Your monomaniacal obsession with the subject, however, is tiresome.

Not one of my other commenters in the thousands of comments on this blog has ever been so blinkered about one subject. You've made your point repeatedly about the low SMV/MMV of both Indian men and women. I don't defend the subjects of your views, nor do I care much for those same subjects. Things are the way they are.

Either find a new dead horse to flog around here, or, better yet, learn not to go into an obsessive spiral. If you must continue to sperg about how horrid life is in India, start your own blog and do it there. My patience for such things has run out.

Any future comments from you on Friday T&A posts, or any other posts, going over the same old trope about how ugly Indian women are, will simply be deleted without publishing. This is not because I defend Indian women. But I don't like listening to broken records either.

No. Read my last comment again.

I did. And my list overlaps with yours almost completely.,

I included :

i) Sub-Saharan Africa.
ii) Any place with a high murder rate (i.e. Central America, non-white parts of Brazil, etc.).
iii) You said 'Central Asia'. Afghanistan is certainly worse than South Asia (some would say it is part of it). But non-war-torn parts of Central Asia (such as Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, etc.) are definitely better than India.

Hell, I even threw in North Korea for good measure (i.e. as worse than India).

It is not that hard to match two lists together.

_________________________________________

You cannot compare the worst parts of Los Angeles or London to the best parts of an Indian city like Hyderabad. Come on, you know better than that. Only averages count, and must be applied consistency.

So you are effectively agreeing with my list.

No. Read my last comment again. There are places in Central and South America, Africa, and Central Asia, that are WORSE than India. Not all of them are war-torn crapholes, they simply aren't very nice places to be in general. India has a lot wrong with it, but it's still better than a lot of places I can think of – including Los Angeles, which has effectively been reduced to Calcutta levels of street sanitation.

Hell, I'd include Hackney in London on the list of places that I would rather not be compared to, say, Banjara Hills in Hyderabad.

But there are worse places to be. Most, but not all, of them tend to be in Africa – though there are plenty of places in Central and South America, and parts of Central Asia, that are every bit as bad.

So you are effectively agreeing with my list.

Thus far I've spent close to 6 months in total in Russia over the past 20 or so.

OK, about 30% or so.

It is a composite of everything, including economic prosperity, cleanliness, whether the culture is 'fun' or not.

India ranks at the bottom of most of those lists.

No, it does not. All you have to do to prove this is to look at comparative rankings of different passports. India's is pretty terrible, but it is nowhere near the bottom.

India is not a great place to be and I wouldn't wish an extended spell in India upon anyone. The sheer stupidity of the place imposes a massive tax upon the health, wealth, and mental energy of anyone who lives there.

But there are worse places to be. Most, but not all, of them tend to be in Africa – though there are plenty of places in Central and South America, and parts of Central Asia, that are every bit as bad.

Any visit to Russia or EE is for one week out of the year at most, and is not cheap relative to whatever earnings capacity you have in India at present.

I go for quite a lot longer than a week. Thus far I've spent close to 6 months in total in Russia over the past 20 or so.

I didn't say it is only about SMV. It is a composite of everything, including economic prosperity, cleanliness, whether the culture is 'fun' or not.

India ranks at the bottom of most of those lists.

"The SMV of Indians is of limited interest to me, "

Well, until you get out of there (and it is my hope that you will), it IS directly relevant to you, simply on account of your surroundings. Any visit to Russia or EE is for one week out of the year at most, and is not cheap relative to whatever earnings capacity you have in India at present.

As far as the girl goes, you've done better, MUCH better.

Do you agree on the four buckets as the only categories of places where it is worse to be born as an average man than South Asia?

Johnny, I really couldn't care less about who is worse off or better off than the average Indian guy. The SMV of Indians is of limited interest to me, and while I can see that it is plainly a major bee in your bonnet, my attitude is simple: a country of 1.4 BILLION people and a 5,000-year-old history has earned the right to be an SMV wasteland if it so wishes, and there is not much point in wondering why or condemning them for the fact.