Fair enough. I'll answer that in a post later.

Just curious Didact. Why do you think that the Slavic’s are not really compatible with Western Euros and descendants? Inquiring minds want to know!🙂

Having no borders would be nice if the people coming in were peaceful families, feminine women from other countries that spice up the gene pool

Having lived among and dealt with Slavic peoples for a decent chunk of time, I can tell you from personal experience that while they are a fun bunch, and they are quite intelligent, and their women are absolutely stunning, they are NOT really compatible with Western Europeans and their descendants.

There is a reason why the Russian mafia stereotype exists in the USA and Britain – because that is a very real thing.

instead we got some death cultists inbred goat fuckers with IQ of 70-80

There I agree with you. Doesn't really help matters much when they go about turning parts of London into Little Karachi.

If anyone is violent criminal or refuses to assimilate to the host culture, then kick them out to a more hostile area and wish them good luck.

This suits me just fine – in fact the Russians have exactly this policy toward Central Asian economic migrants. But lawfare and "human rights" challenges in Britain and much of the Anglosphere make it impossible to enforce this. The Brits just tried to deport a bunch of violent Jamaicans back to their Caribbean homeland, and barely managed it thanks to the endless legal challenges involved.

With regards to the Arabs, they have a highly hedonistic culture, but they seem to be extremely sly and sneaky for people who like to show off.

There are two key things to understand about Arabs.

First, they have a completely tribal mindset. The saying that best encapsulates it is: "Me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; us against my tribe; and my tribe against the world". That is a big part of the reason why pan-Arab nationalism simply doesn't work.

Second, they are a nomadic desert people with no history of producing anything of real value on their own. What little they did produce came from trade. So they are classic mercantilists as a result.

The hedonism of Arab culture comes from that mercantilism combined with the near-total freedom for indulging in base desires provided by Islam. The fake religion of "peace" provides a complete imprimatur for the absolute worst behaviours that men are capable of indulging in, without any thought to the consequences.

On the one hand borders and passports give economic control to countries over its citizens, but since a large part of the planet cannot be trusted we have to have those things. We need to bring back the exile system as well. If anyone is violent criminal or refuses to assimilate to the host culture, then kick them out to a more hostile area and wish them good luck.

With regards to the Arabs, they have a highly hedonistic culture, but they seem to be extremely sly and sneaky for people who like to show off.

There's a link between your dot and the dot offered by John Taylor Gatto, if you're sharp enough to find it. It's the key to why the Left hates the West.

youtu.be/6D_lCyffe0w

Manila with flavours of Johannesburg.

The Leftists will naturally choose to want to live in such places as Makati and BGC, but they'll be importing labour to maintain their louche lifestyles from everywhere around them, creating a kind of de facto economic apartheid scheme.

They'll want to live close to the labour force that supports them, but not too close, much in the same way that Glukhovsky's oligarchs in the "Metro 2033" through "Metro 2035" series of novels like to be close to the people they manipulate, even though they choose to live in very well-protected bunkers.

Throw into this mess some "ethnicity wars" that are latent and casually cloaked, and you get Manila with flavours of Johannesburg.

These Leftists may have managed to import the means by which they can live an essentially European Left means of life, but they only are able to do so within affluent ghettoes. These will not scale up to the grand designs of Dubai, but instead will remain pockets of louche convenience, which is actually where the rank-and-file of Leftists prefer to be as well.

Or, if you'd like, present-day Mollenbeek, the carbuncle on the back side of Brussels that demonstrates how the EU continues to float along on a sea of lies, reflects the results at the other extreme.

But as far as true global cities go as well as entire countries, less Dubai, less Detroit, and a lot more Manila plus Johannesburg.

Basically the downtown area is filled with businesses, casinos, sports arenas, etc and generates a lot of tax revenue for the city, so that is where the city focuses a lot of its police and infrastructure cleanup because the city wants to make sure that people feel safe and keep coming downtown to spend their money and that tax paying businesses stay there. There are plenty of times where I will work late at night and leave to walk to a parking garage and see lone businesswomen also leaving to go to their cars as well, it's not that bad.

Most of Detroits real crime problems and no-go areas are in the old suburbs that are part of the city proper. Those are the mad max hellscapes that you do not want to enter. But they arent really what I'd think of as inner city. The suburbs that I live in and that the Detroit whites fled to back in the day are actually independent cities of their own and not actually part of Detroit.

In The West, a man is known by what he does. His employment is directly responsible for the respect he recieves. The better his job, the more respect he receives.

In the dirt world, however, it is precisely the opposite. The less work a man performs, the more he is respected. That is one of the reasons why slavery is still alive and well in the dirt world… a 'man of means' doesn't have to lift a single finger to receive everything. Working in any way, is beneath him.

Much like the raising of children. a Man of the west has a single wife, and she is his helpmate and draws respect as well as assisting him with the social networking which is the cornerstone of his success. Each of his offspring is a mark of status, and a man that has even one highly successful offspring is noted as being proof of his worthiness.

A Man of the east, however, is remarked by how many women he can keep under his thumb. His wives are not only useless, they too will detract from his status if they assist him in any way other than popping out an endless stream of worthless mouths. His respect is based on how many hordes of males he can produce… the more useless, the better.

This is a recipe for endless dirt world status. No one is expected to achieve anything, or to do anything, if he wishes to be well regarded. Obviously, this means that the dirt world as a whole will never achieve anything except through conquest…. which is a great place to throw all of those useless, wifless, hopeless sons.

That's one of the biggest problems with the left…. they are post-modernists, demanding that all cultures are 'valid' and 'created equal'…. this is patently false. Some cultures are simply better than others… and a culture where individual success is vital, where work is the most valuable thing a man can produce, is utterly and innately superior and will produce a better result EVERY time.

You can see it all around the world… third world countries that value useless wealth versus successful cultures that value being as lazy as possible. It is, literally, the definition of a third world country… That it values laziness.