<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The best a manlet can get	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/the-best-manlet-can-get.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/the-best-manlet-can-get.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Defence of the Mantle of Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:36:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LastRedoubt		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/the-best-manlet-can-get.html#comment-1756</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LastRedoubt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2019 23:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1756</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s poison.

Glanced at an ARS article tat came up on my feed re: the APA guidelines, and the &#034;but the guidelines are only just&#034; jsutifications are anuseating, as well as teh condescending &#034;conservatives hate science&#034; or &#034;people complaining about the article didn&#039;t bother to read the article/guidelines&#034;

The guidelines are even worse SJW word salad than the  APA article.  And I think the people at ARS - especially the author about the APA article - aren&#039;t understanding that the APA magazine writer knows exactly what he is talking about and isn&#039;t a conservative vilifying the APA guidelines, as they keep defending the posting not being about attacking positive manly virtues.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s poison.</p>
<p>Glanced at an ARS article tat came up on my feed re: the APA guidelines, and the &quot;but the guidelines are only just&quot; jsutifications are anuseating, as well as teh condescending &quot;conservatives hate science&quot; or &quot;people complaining about the article didn&#39;t bother to read the article/guidelines&quot;</p>
<p>The guidelines are even worse SJW word salad than the  APA article.  And I think the people at ARS &#8211; especially the author about the APA article &#8211; aren&#39;t understanding that the APA magazine writer knows exactly what he is talking about and isn&#39;t a conservative vilifying the APA guidelines, as they keep defending the posting not being about attacking positive manly virtues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
