<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rise of the machines	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/rise-of-machines.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/rise-of-machines.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Defence of the Mantle of Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:36:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Didact		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/rise-of-machines.html#comment-1729</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Didact]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2019 07:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1729</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/rise-of-machines.html#comment-1726&quot;&gt;Ward B.&lt;/a&gt;.

I read the book, never watched either of the movies. Ad the thing is that the more that I look around at today&#039;s women - yes, even the more cosmopolitan Eastern European ones - the more that I think that The Stepford Wives was actually a brilliant subversive work meant to make us think that highly submissive, compliant, sexy, perfectly coiffed women are the best thing in the world.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/rise-of-machines.html#comment-1726">Ward B.</a>.</p>
<p>I read the book, never watched either of the movies. Ad the thing is that the more that I look around at today&#39;s women &#8211; yes, even the more cosmopolitan Eastern European ones &#8211; the more that I think that The Stepford Wives was actually a brilliant subversive work meant to make us think that highly submissive, compliant, sexy, perfectly coiffed women are the best thing in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A.B. Prosper		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/rise-of-machines.html#comment-1728</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A.B. Prosper]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2019 02:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1728</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Good article but with one  small error.  The patriarchal  nuclear family is the smallest possible stable family not necessarily the best.

The reason its been pushed in lieu of the healthier extended family is  the extended family has much less need of big business, big government or big religion . 

At times its a threat to all of these things and when you get a network of these families, you get clans and tribes which are the most stable human formation. 

However the stronger the clan the less powerful the centralizers are and with enough strong clans, you have a plurality of small states. This can lead to chaos although from a human needs perspective, its fairly optimal.

In the end  though so long a society holds out just as you said sex bots will accelerate the end of modernity. I figure they&#039;ll reduce the bastardy rate which is for whites 30% of all child birth. Upsides, more families are two parent, Downside up to 1/3 less families. 

White the overall TFR below replacement and declining  the US will easily hit Poland level or lower. 

My guess is this will go on until it can&#039;t. This will be either when society can no longer support the complexity level required for these things or some kind of Right Wing Authoritarians take over

I&#039;d guess the former  but by that time the US will resemble Brazil or on a long enough time frame 2219 will look more like 1819 than Star Trek and the majority of the population will be low tech  freehold farmers 

This won&#039;t take long as the same tech will render a lot of jobs obsolete. That lack of ability to provide income enough for a family without impoverishing ones self is diminishing and its a huge chunk of the current fertility shortfall. No good stable jobs in modernity mean no babies 

The real nightmare is when young men decide they&#039;ll never be able to support a family and are to demoralized or too suppressed to eliminate the elite and decide to use the one that normally would go for family into that sex bot. A nice one might be leased for far less than the cost of a single child 


All that aside, a Cherry 2000 or the like especially one that could cook and was programmed to be actually pleasant and feminine  would be superior to any modern woman in terms of company. Caveat of course for the religious

 How we deal with that no one knows. Maybe we don&#039;t and modernity comes to an end with a moan and a bang 
 ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good article but with one  small error.  The patriarchal  nuclear family is the smallest possible stable family not necessarily the best.</p>
<p>The reason its been pushed in lieu of the healthier extended family is  the extended family has much less need of big business, big government or big religion . </p>
<p>At times its a threat to all of these things and when you get a network of these families, you get clans and tribes which are the most stable human formation. </p>
<p>However the stronger the clan the less powerful the centralizers are and with enough strong clans, you have a plurality of small states. This can lead to chaos although from a human needs perspective, its fairly optimal.</p>
<p>In the end  though so long a society holds out just as you said sex bots will accelerate the end of modernity. I figure they&#39;ll reduce the bastardy rate which is for whites 30% of all child birth. Upsides, more families are two parent, Downside up to 1/3 less families. </p>
<p>White the overall TFR below replacement and declining  the US will easily hit Poland level or lower. </p>
<p>My guess is this will go on until it can&#39;t. This will be either when society can no longer support the complexity level required for these things or some kind of Right Wing Authoritarians take over</p>
<p>I&#39;d guess the former  but by that time the US will resemble Brazil or on a long enough time frame 2219 will look more like 1819 than Star Trek and the majority of the population will be low tech  freehold farmers </p>
<p>This won&#39;t take long as the same tech will render a lot of jobs obsolete. That lack of ability to provide income enough for a family without impoverishing ones self is diminishing and its a huge chunk of the current fertility shortfall. No good stable jobs in modernity mean no babies </p>
<p>The real nightmare is when young men decide they&#39;ll never be able to support a family and are to demoralized or too suppressed to eliminate the elite and decide to use the one that normally would go for family into that sex bot. A nice one might be leased for far less than the cost of a single child </p>
<p>All that aside, a Cherry 2000 or the like especially one that could cook and was programmed to be actually pleasant and feminine  would be superior to any modern woman in terms of company. Caveat of course for the religious</p>
<p> How we deal with that no one knows. Maybe we don&#39;t and modernity comes to an end with a moan and a bang </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LastRedoubt		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/rise-of-machines.html#comment-1727</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LastRedoubt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The guys who get lost in sexbots, in terms of alcoholics, vs those who may use them but can take it or leave it, or not use them at all, will be winnowed out, maybe.

Alphas will still get chicks. Because.

Women may have to step up their game for the beta bucks as fewer guys want to put up wit their shit. Maybe to the point of less alpha fucks?

Even in the best world it can&#039;t help the birthrate any unless women really step up their shit.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guys who get lost in sexbots, in terms of alcoholics, vs those who may use them but can take it or leave it, or not use them at all, will be winnowed out, maybe.</p>
<p>Alphas will still get chicks. Because.</p>
<p>Women may have to step up their game for the beta bucks as fewer guys want to put up wit their shit. Maybe to the point of less alpha fucks?</p>
<p>Even in the best world it can&#39;t help the birthrate any unless women really step up their shit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Ward B.		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/rise-of-machines.html#comment-1726</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ward B.]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2019 18:05:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Stepford Wives (1975)  was a documentary. Huh. Who&#039;d have thought it? 
Heh.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Stepford Wives (1975)  was a documentary. Huh. Who&#39;d have thought it?<br />
Heh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean Carnegie		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/rise-of-machines.html#comment-1725</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Carnegie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2019 17:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1725</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Also, just looked at their website.  Base model for this particular one is $3100 Canadian.  

And that&#039;s when women truly were frightened/triggered.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, just looked at their website.  Base model for this particular one is $3100 Canadian.  </p>
<p>And that&#39;s when women truly were frightened/triggered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sean Carnegie		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2019/01/rise-of-machines.html#comment-1724</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sean Carnegie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2019 17:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1724</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wow.  Only six bag?  Imagine a high end escort once a week for a year.  Roughly two monkeys a month, 12 bag a year.  For only half of that, you get twice the value at minimum.

Wonder if they&#039;re warrantied.  &#034;If she doesn&#039;t last two years, we replace at pro-rated cost.&#034;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  Only six bag?  Imagine a high end escort once a week for a year.  Roughly two monkeys a month, 12 bag a year.  For only half of that, you get twice the value at minimum.</p>
<p>Wonder if they&#39;re warrantied.  &quot;If she doesn&#39;t last two years, we replace at pro-rated cost.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
