<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Russkies have AT-STs now	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://didacticmind.com/2018/08/the-russkies-have-at-sts-now.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://didacticmind.com/2018/08/the-russkies-have-at-sts-now.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Defence of the Mantle of Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 12:39:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dire Badger		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2018/08/the-russkies-have-at-sts-now.html#comment-1999</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dire Badger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Aug 2018 02:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1999</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The question is, what &#039;role&#039; would something like that have?

Ground power? Low profile is the name of the game for ground power. No matter how good your armor, it is always cheaper to create a weapon that can destroy it. The rule for ground power is &#039;smaller is better&#039; as long as it can fulfill it&#039;s job... Tanks are incredibly vulnerable without infantry to protect them, and the &#039;bottom&#039; of the combat effectiveness size pyramid is a human being with a weapon... still the best combat creation for it&#039;s scale in existence.

Air power? It&#039;s radar cross section is HUGE... instant kill via a far less expensive aircraft.
Ocean power? It doesn&#039;t float, and if it submerges the noise from a humanoid shape like that would attract torpedoes like flies.

Don&#039;t get me wrong, mechs are VERY cool, but until a defensive development that is insanely science fiction... such as force fields, such a device is simply impractical for anything resembling combat. And even WITH &#039;improbable&#039; science advances, much more compact forms than a mech would still utterly dominate such a pointlessly complex device.

There are millions of possible NON combat roles, however, that a walker could excel at... construction, Minesweeping, demolitions, disposal, medical, hot zone fortification, and hazardous environment to name just a few...

But mounting a pair of machine guns instead of those arms (or anywhere but perhaps on a top automated pintle mount for dealing with nuisance infantry) would literally wreck any possible usefulness it possesses compared to vehicles that would cost a fraction of it&#039;s expense.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is, what &#39;role&#39; would something like that have?</p>
<p>Ground power? Low profile is the name of the game for ground power. No matter how good your armor, it is always cheaper to create a weapon that can destroy it. The rule for ground power is &#39;smaller is better&#39; as long as it can fulfill it&#39;s job&#8230; Tanks are incredibly vulnerable without infantry to protect them, and the &#39;bottom&#39; of the combat effectiveness size pyramid is a human being with a weapon&#8230; still the best combat creation for it&#39;s scale in existence.</p>
<p>Air power? It&#39;s radar cross section is HUGE&#8230; instant kill via a far less expensive aircraft.<br />
Ocean power? It doesn&#39;t float, and if it submerges the noise from a humanoid shape like that would attract torpedoes like flies.</p>
<p>Don&#39;t get me wrong, mechs are VERY cool, but until a defensive development that is insanely science fiction&#8230; such as force fields, such a device is simply impractical for anything resembling combat. And even WITH &#39;improbable&#39; science advances, much more compact forms than a mech would still utterly dominate such a pointlessly complex device.</p>
<p>There are millions of possible NON combat roles, however, that a walker could excel at&#8230; construction, Minesweeping, demolitions, disposal, medical, hot zone fortification, and hazardous environment to name just a few&#8230;</p>
<p>But mounting a pair of machine guns instead of those arms (or anywhere but perhaps on a top automated pintle mount for dealing with nuisance infantry) would literally wreck any possible usefulness it possesses compared to vehicles that would cost a fraction of it&#39;s expense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: RMChris		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2018/08/the-russkies-have-at-sts-now.html#comment-1998</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RMChris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2018 05:25:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1998</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looks like a Battletech prototype.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like a Battletech prototype.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Andy		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2018/08/the-russkies-have-at-sts-now.html#comment-1997</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2018 18:49:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-1997</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I thought it looked more akin to Robocop&#039;s ED-209]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought it looked more akin to Robocop&#39;s ED-209</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
