Comments on: On the J(P)Q

By: Didact

Didact — Tue, 08 May 2018 12:16:48 +0000

for the US we should pull the citizenship of and boot anyone who places another country over ours while claiming our citizenship

Now that is a policy that I can get behind – though I have to say, sir, the penalty of shooting seems really quite gentle relative to your usual preferred method of crucifixion. I don't suppose you're mellowing with age?

By: Tom Kratman

Tom Kratman — Mon, 07 May 2018 17:26:41 +0000

In reply to Tom Kratman. Not necessarily. If they're giving medical aid to the enemy who has not yet been captured, I'd just shoot them.

By: Dire Badger

Dire Badger — Sat, 05 May 2018 05:05:55 +0000

In reply to Tom Kratman. You mean, like 'doctors without borders'?

By: Tom Kratman

Tom Kratman — Fri, 04 May 2018 18:17:30 +0000

Embrace the concept of "consensus," which, from the outside, is almost indistinguishable from conspiracy. (And note the core illogic of claiming that the Jews – 108 or 111 or 115, makes no difference – are actually bright enough to run a conspiracy of that magnitude. Naaaaaaah. It's a preposterous notion.)

A consensus exists when similar peoples, with similar backgrounds and educations, see similar problems, issues, and opportunities, similarly, and come up with similar solutions and courses of action. That's likely what's going on with the Jews. But a big conspiracy? No; they're not competent enough for that; nobody is. Do they favor each other and each other's children? Generally. Will they support Israel even when not in the interests of their home country? Surely, and, while that's understandable, for the US we should pull the citizenship of and boot anyone who places another country over ours while claiming our citizenship.

By: LastRedoubt

LastRedoubt — Thu, 03 May 2018 22:51:23 +0000

Here's the funny thing.

I still consider him a useful tool – like Methadone. It doesn't change the fact that in his lectures he purveys some useful info, destroys some myths that need to be destroyed, and utterly CALLED C-16 and stood up against it.

But I also knew that he was not one of us – and believe even covered it several times outside of the last week. The willingness to believe the mainstream lie of Nazis as right wing, as well as the alt-right==neo nazis, and the fact that while he skirts the topic of his fear that the right will respond with tat for the leftists identity politics tit, he refuses to fully set out that if we don't respond to defend the group DESIGNATED BY THE AttACKERS in a way that stops them short, they will see it works and keep doing it.

That if the attacked don't coalesce around defending the attacked identity, form a shared identity they are willing to defend and forge alliances with, even if they never gave a shit before, that they will "hang separately" because they didn't "hang together"

In short, fails game theory 101, prisoners dilemma, tragedy of the commons, and the christian golden rule.