<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: FailBot fails again	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://didacticmind.com/2016/12/failbot-fails-again.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://didacticmind.com/2016/12/failbot-fails-again.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Defence of the Mantle of Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:34:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom Kratman		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2016/12/failbot-fails-again.html#comment-2900</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom Kratman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2016 03:17:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2900</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2016/12/failbot-fails-again.html#comment-2897&quot;&gt;Eduardo the Magnificent&lt;/a&gt;.

You&#039;re possibly stuck on the notion that, because congress&#039; powers are enumerated, the president&#039;s are, too.  They&#039;re not.  He has enumerated responsibilities, not enumerated powers.  His power is &#034;the executive power,&#034; which is undefined in the constitution but is fairly close to what a constitutional monarch has.  

That enumerated responsibilities thing is key, here, because among those responsibilities is to &#034;take care that the laws be faithfully executed.&#034;  He cannot do that in areas in rebellion, or occupied by an attacking enemy.  This should tell you something about his power, he MUST wage war - even if only on his own hook - when necessary to fulfill his responsibilities.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2016/12/failbot-fails-again.html#comment-2897">Eduardo the Magnificent</a>.</p>
<p>You&#39;re possibly stuck on the notion that, because congress&#39; powers are enumerated, the president&#39;s are, too.  They&#39;re not.  He has enumerated responsibilities, not enumerated powers.  His power is &quot;the executive power,&quot; which is undefined in the constitution but is fairly close to what a constitutional monarch has.  </p>
<p>That enumerated responsibilities thing is key, here, because among those responsibilities is to &quot;take care that the laws be faithfully executed.&quot;  He cannot do that in areas in rebellion, or occupied by an attacking enemy.  This should tell you something about his power, he MUST wage war &#8211; even if only on his own hook &#8211; when necessary to fulfill his responsibilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Unknown		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2016/12/failbot-fails-again.html#comment-2899</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 20:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2899</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2016/12/failbot-fails-again.html#comment-2897&quot;&gt;Eduardo the Magnificent&lt;/a&gt;.

a president was never supposed to have the amount of power one does now either. Lincoln made sure that the president was temporarily god.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2016/12/failbot-fails-again.html#comment-2897">Eduardo the Magnificent</a>.</p>
<p>a president was never supposed to have the amount of power one does now either. Lincoln made sure that the president was temporarily god.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Unknown		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2016/12/failbot-fails-again.html#comment-2898</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Unknown]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 02:30:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2898</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Am I the only one that gets the Irony of a &#039;Faithless&#039; elector voting for &#039;Faith&#039;?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one that gets the Irony of a &#39;Faithless&#39; elector voting for &#39;Faith&#39;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Eduardo the Magnificent		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2016/12/failbot-fails-again.html#comment-2897</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eduardo the Magnificent]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2016 00:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2897</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If you want to get real technical, the college is supposed to vote their conscience.

  mises.org/library/origins-electoral-college

However, as the author notes, it&#039;s become commonly accepted that the electors choose the winner of the college, and without re-educating the public on the process, it&#039;s too late to turn back now. Unlike choosing representatives, picking the president was never supposed to be democratic, but here we are.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you want to get real technical, the college is supposed to vote their conscience.</p>
<p>  mises.org/library/origins-electoral-college</p>
<p>However, as the author notes, it&#39;s become commonly accepted that the electors choose the winner of the college, and without re-educating the public on the process, it&#39;s too late to turn back now. Unlike choosing representatives, picking the president was never supposed to be democratic, but here we are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
