<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Talk to me, Goose&#8230;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://didacticmind.com/2015/10/talk-to-me-goose.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/10/talk-to-me-goose.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Defence of the Mantle of Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:42:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dire Badger		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/10/talk-to-me-goose.html#comment-3605</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dire Badger]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2015 00:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3605</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[the F35 debacle is simply a retread of the M-2 Bradley]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the F35 debacle is simply a retread of the M-2 Bradley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sebastien_Laqroix		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/10/talk-to-me-goose.html#comment-3604</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastien_Laqroix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:37:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3604</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hmmm... was that Lind&#039;s lecture in Riding the Red Horse? or am I confusing it with something else.

I too plan on reading through Mr. Lind&#039;s &#034;4GW Canon&#034; eventually. Unfortunately I have far too big a reading list, there are just too many books out there. So much knowledge right at our finger tips and people would rather watch stupidity on TV.

Perhaps I must have missed it.. I&#039;m new to this and my knowledge is extremely limited, but does Lind mention or do you have any thoughts on what the cause of this regressive trend from 3GW to 2GW is? Is it something as simple as human capacity for complacency, greed and all that other stuff? or is it something more complicated?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm&#8230; was that Lind&#39;s lecture in Riding the Red Horse? or am I confusing it with something else.</p>
<p>I too plan on reading through Mr. Lind&#39;s &quot;4GW Canon&quot; eventually. Unfortunately I have far too big a reading list, there are just too many books out there. So much knowledge right at our finger tips and people would rather watch stupidity on TV.</p>
<p>Perhaps I must have missed it.. I&#39;m new to this and my knowledge is extremely limited, but does Lind mention or do you have any thoughts on what the cause of this regressive trend from 3GW to 2GW is? Is it something as simple as human capacity for complacency, greed and all that other stuff? or is it something more complicated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Didact		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/10/talk-to-me-goose.html#comment-3603</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Didact]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 18:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3603</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[That book should be mandatory reading for every person in the military leadership

That, along with Mr. Lind&#039;s FMFM-1 field manual for the Marine Corps, which he referenced extensively within the On War collection.

BTW, if you liked that, I highly recommend Castalia House&#039;s transcription of his lecture, The Four Generations of Modern War. It&#039;s a superb summary of the 4GW philosophy and is a very quick read. I&#039;m currently working my way through Mr. Lind&#039;s &#034;4GW Canon&#034; (admittedly somewhat out of order), and once you&#039;ve read that set of books as well, suddenly the patterns of warfare seen in the last century or so will make vastly more sense to you.

These clowns in the Pentagon should be whacked over the head with Lind&#039;s tome. We&#039;ll likely be spending more money and losing more fights only to have the Pentagon demand more money because &#034;last time, we lost because we didn&#039;t have enough money, so give us more this time&#034;

Indeed. They never, ever, ever learn.

To be as fair as possible, part of the problem comes from the fact that not only is a 3rd-Generation military exceedingly hard to create out of a 2nd-Generation one- as the Marine Corps found out in the late 1980s- but keeping such a military is even harder. The Israelis are the perfect example. They used to be one of the most decentralised, flexible, and highly reactive militaries in the world. These days, they&#039;re almost as big on bright shiny toys and ossified central-command systems as their American counterparts.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That book should be mandatory reading for every person in the military leadership</p>
<p>That, along with Mr. Lind&#39;s FMFM-1 field manual for the Marine Corps, which he referenced extensively within the On War collection.</p>
<p>BTW, if you liked that, I highly recommend Castalia House&#39;s transcription of his lecture, The Four Generations of Modern War. It&#39;s a superb summary of the 4GW philosophy and is a very quick read. I&#39;m currently working my way through Mr. Lind&#39;s &quot;4GW Canon&quot; (admittedly somewhat out of order), and once you&#39;ve read that set of books as well, suddenly the patterns of warfare seen in the last century or so will make vastly more sense to you.</p>
<p>These clowns in the Pentagon should be whacked over the head with Lind&#39;s tome. We&#39;ll likely be spending more money and losing more fights only to have the Pentagon demand more money because &quot;last time, we lost because we didn&#39;t have enough money, so give us more this time&quot;</p>
<p>Indeed. They never, ever, ever learn.</p>
<p>To be as fair as possible, part of the problem comes from the fact that not only is a 3rd-Generation military exceedingly hard to create out of a 2nd-Generation one- as the Marine Corps found out in the late 1980s- but keeping such a military is even harder. The Israelis are the perfect example. They used to be one of the most decentralised, flexible, and highly reactive militaries in the world. These days, they&#39;re almost as big on bright shiny toys and ossified central-command systems as their American counterparts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sebastien_Laqroix		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/10/talk-to-me-goose.html#comment-3602</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sebastien_Laqroix]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 17:35:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3602</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I finished reading William S. Lind&#039;s &#034;On War&#034; earlier this year and that book was a huge eye-opener. I knew very little about modern warfare before reading that book. Now I can safely say that I know a little bit more than I used to. That book should be mandatory reading for every person in the military leadership. The Pentagon only cares about shiny new toys, regardless of whether they work or not. Nevermind the fact that in order to truly fight 4th generation warfare, you&#039;d have to cut out all that expensive and shiny technology for more practical solutions like you imply. These clowns in the Pentagon should be whacked over the head with Lind&#039;s tome. We&#039;ll likely be spending more money and losing more fights only to have the Pentagon demand more money because &#034;last time, we lost because we didn&#039;t have enough money, so give us more this time&#034; ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I finished reading William S. Lind&#39;s &quot;On War&quot; earlier this year and that book was a huge eye-opener. I knew very little about modern warfare before reading that book. Now I can safely say that I know a little bit more than I used to. That book should be mandatory reading for every person in the military leadership. The Pentagon only cares about shiny new toys, regardless of whether they work or not. Nevermind the fact that in order to truly fight 4th generation warfare, you&#39;d have to cut out all that expensive and shiny technology for more practical solutions like you imply. These clowns in the Pentagon should be whacked over the head with Lind&#39;s tome. We&#39;ll likely be spending more money and losing more fights only to have the Pentagon demand more money because &quot;last time, we lost because we didn&#39;t have enough money, so give us more this time&quot; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Didact		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/10/talk-to-me-goose.html#comment-3601</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Didact]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 14:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3601</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2015/10/talk-to-me-goose.html#comment-3600&quot;&gt;Midknight&lt;/a&gt;.

Yeah, I know what you mean. There are large parts of that movie that I simply cannot watch anymore- that godawful bit where Maverick meets Charlie at her house for the first time comes to mind- but the sheer epicness of the dogfighting and aerial training sequences more than makes up for the rest of it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2015/10/talk-to-me-goose.html#comment-3600">Midknight</a>.</p>
<p>Yeah, I know what you mean. There are large parts of that movie that I simply cannot watch anymore- that godawful bit where Maverick meets Charlie at her house for the first time comes to mind- but the sheer epicness of the dogfighting and aerial training sequences more than makes up for the rest of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Midknight		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/10/talk-to-me-goose.html#comment-3600</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Midknight]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2015 06:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3600</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[TOP GUN.

Spent two years working at Circuit City (electronics store chain, now out of business), 3-4 days a week, and they had it on the TV&#039;s 75% of the time.

That said, the aerial sequences are still awesome sauce, even if the rest of the movie is thoroughly ruined.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TOP GUN.</p>
<p>Spent two years working at Circuit City (electronics store chain, now out of business), 3-4 days a week, and they had it on the TV&#39;s 75% of the time.</p>
<p>That said, the aerial sequences are still awesome sauce, even if the rest of the movie is thoroughly ruined.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
