<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The consequences of homogamy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://didacticmind.com/2015/03/the-consequences-of-homogamy.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/03/the-consequences-of-homogamy.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Defence of the Mantle of Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:45:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ryu238		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/03/the-consequences-of-homogamy.html#comment-3781</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ryu238]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Dec 2018 23:38:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3781</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;It is usually at this point that someone would attempt to counteract Ms. Barwick&#039;s arguments, based entirely on anecdotal evidence, by attempting to drown out such horrendous badthink by shouting about how THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED&#034; How is miss Barwick not anecdotal at all and somehow statistically representative? 

&#034;This observation has been borne out in several studies and was documented extensively in Robin Baker&#039;s groundbreaking classic Sperm Wars.&#034; Ypu mean that piece of shit book?   reddit.com/r/science/comments/b24gl/sperm_wars_the_science_of_sex/
Why don&#039;t you check your facts? 
&#034;Except... it turns out that the science is not settled.&#034; Um it is.   boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,003.htm
  alternet.org/speakeasy/alvinmcewen/family-research-council-distorts-researchers-work-decade-after-he-demanded

&#034;It is easy to blather on about the virtues of gay &#034;marriage&#034; when you don&#039;t have to think about the consequences. But when you realise that the consequences involve potentially destroying the lives of young children, it is rather a lot more difficult to simply ignore the train-wreck that is the logical end-result of your ideas.&#034; If you can&#039;t get the facts right, why should we think you do care?

  quora.com/What-is-your-opinion-on-Heather-Barwicks-reason-against-same-sex-marriage

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;It is usually at this point that someone would attempt to counteract Ms. Barwick&#39;s arguments, based entirely on anecdotal evidence, by attempting to drown out such horrendous badthink by shouting about how THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED&quot; How is miss Barwick not anecdotal at all and somehow statistically representative? </p>
<p>&quot;This observation has been borne out in several studies and was documented extensively in Robin Baker&#39;s groundbreaking classic Sperm Wars.&quot; Ypu mean that piece of shit book?   reddit.com/r/science/comments/b24gl/sperm_wars_the_science_of_sex/<br />
Why don&#39;t you check your facts?<br />
&quot;Except&#8230; it turns out that the science is not settled.&quot; Um it is.   boxturtlebulletin.com/Articles/000,003.htm<br />
  alternet.org/speakeasy/alvinmcewen/family-research-council-distorts-researchers-work-decade-after-he-demanded</p>
<p>&quot;It is easy to blather on about the virtues of gay &quot;marriage&quot; when you don&#39;t have to think about the consequences. But when you realise that the consequences involve potentially destroying the lives of young children, it is rather a lot more difficult to simply ignore the train-wreck that is the logical end-result of your ideas.&quot; If you can&#39;t get the facts right, why should we think you do care?</p>
<p>  quora.com/What-is-your-opinion-on-Heather-Barwicks-reason-against-same-sex-marriage</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
