<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Shorts	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://didacticmind.com/2015/01/shorts-4.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/01/shorts-4.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Defence of the Mantle of Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:46:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Didact		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/01/shorts-4.html#comment-3833</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Didact]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 18:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3833</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2015/01/shorts-4.html#comment-3832&quot;&gt;A. Nonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

One word: &#034;midichlorians&#034;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2015/01/shorts-4.html#comment-3832">A. Nonymous</a>.</p>
<p>One word: &quot;midichlorians&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A. Nonymous		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/01/shorts-4.html#comment-3832</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A. Nonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2015 07:55:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3832</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ll have to disagree, because the integral backstory of SW canon, prior to The Mouse getting his grubby paws on it all, was not defined by Anderson, McIntyre and Hambly, whose works, in my opinion at least, ultimately amounted to little more than silly one-offs with little in the way of lasting influence on the overall tenor of the universe. There&#039;s something very different at work in Halo, where the literature, in trying to explain the existence of such creatures as SPARTAN-IIs in the first place, becomes either deeply disturbing (anything relating to Catherine Halsey&#039;s justifications for her various mad science projects) or flat-out ridiculous (the routine pillorying, in-universe and out, of James Ackerson for doing almost exactly the same thing as what Halsey is worshipped for, or the fact that the writers&#039; attempts to make MJOLNIR armour super-duper-special-awesomeness that only the SPARTAN demi-gods can wear essentially renders it completely redundant).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;ll have to disagree, because the integral backstory of SW canon, prior to The Mouse getting his grubby paws on it all, was not defined by Anderson, McIntyre and Hambly, whose works, in my opinion at least, ultimately amounted to little more than silly one-offs with little in the way of lasting influence on the overall tenor of the universe. There&#39;s something very different at work in Halo, where the literature, in trying to explain the existence of such creatures as SPARTAN-IIs in the first place, becomes either deeply disturbing (anything relating to Catherine Halsey&#39;s justifications for her various mad science projects) or flat-out ridiculous (the routine pillorying, in-universe and out, of James Ackerson for doing almost exactly the same thing as what Halsey is worshipped for, or the fact that the writers&#39; attempts to make MJOLNIR armour super-duper-special-awesomeness that only the SPARTAN demi-gods can wear essentially renders it completely redundant).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Didact		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/01/shorts-4.html#comment-3831</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Didact]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2015 08:22:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3831</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2015/01/shorts-4.html#comment-3830&quot;&gt;A. Nonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

The HALO novels can get pretty dicey.

But nothing- and I mean nothing- in the expanded HALO canon is anywhere near as bad as the horrors that Kevin J. Anderson, Vonda N. McIntyre, and Barbara Hambly inflicted upon the STAR WARS EU canon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2015/01/shorts-4.html#comment-3830">A. Nonymous</a>.</p>
<p>The HALO novels can get pretty dicey.</p>
<p>But nothing- and I mean nothing- in the expanded HALO canon is anywhere near as bad as the horrors that Kevin J. Anderson, Vonda N. McIntyre, and Barbara Hambly inflicted upon the STAR WARS EU canon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A. Nonymous		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2015/01/shorts-4.html#comment-3830</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A. Nonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2015 23:10:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-3830</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[A Halo fan mocking Star Wars for the quality of its supplementary literature falls quite deeply inside of &#034;pot calling the kettle black&#034; territory.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Halo fan mocking Star Wars for the quality of its supplementary literature falls quite deeply inside of &quot;pot calling the kettle black&quot; territory.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
