<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: The Keynesian&#8217;s Bible	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://didacticmind.com/2013/08/the-keynesians-bible.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://didacticmind.com/2013/08/the-keynesians-bible.html</link>
	<description>Strategic Defence of the Mantle of Responsibility</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Aug 2020 20:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2013/08/the-keynesians-bible.html#comment-4265</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Aug 2013 12:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4265</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It was through VoxDay, where I first heard about Ian Fletcher and his book. I have now finished the book and I seriously don’t know why people cannot put two and two together, and come to the conclusion that free trade is a load of rubbish. Maybe, it’s just our INTJ personality to cut through the bullshit and see the bigger picture. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It was through VoxDay, where I first heard about Ian Fletcher and his book. I have now finished the book and I seriously don’t know why people cannot put two and two together, and come to the conclusion that free trade is a load of rubbish. Maybe, it’s just our INTJ personality to cut through the bullshit and see the bigger picture. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Didact		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2013/08/the-keynesians-bible.html#comment-4264</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Didact]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Aug 2013 18:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4264</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2013/08/the-keynesians-bible.html#comment-4263&quot;&gt;Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

True. Hazlitt does not break with libertarian orthodoxy at all on the subject of free trade, and this is the one place where even great thinkers like him and Hans-Hermann Hoppe consistently fall flat. Ian Fletcher&#039;s book is in fact part of the basis for Vox Day&#039;s antipathy towards the entire edifice of free trade, and if you&#039;re interested in seeing an argument against free trade made from solid first principles, then I highly recommend reading through what Vox has written on the subject. Like me, he started out as a free-trader; and it&#039;s thanks to him that I&#039;ve largely changed my mind on the subject.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2013/08/the-keynesians-bible.html#comment-4263">Anonymous</a>.</p>
<p>True. Hazlitt does not break with libertarian orthodoxy at all on the subject of free trade, and this is the one place where even great thinkers like him and Hans-Hermann Hoppe consistently fall flat. Ian Fletcher&#39;s book is in fact part of the basis for Vox Day&#39;s antipathy towards the entire edifice of free trade, and if you&#39;re interested in seeing an argument against free trade made from solid first principles, then I highly recommend reading through what Vox has written on the subject. Like me, he started out as a free-trader; and it&#39;s thanks to him that I&#39;ve largely changed my mind on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2013/08/the-keynesians-bible.html#comment-4263</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Aug 2013 10:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4263</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Thanks for clearing that up. Hazlitt is good, however I find his stance (which is the stance of the average Libertarian) on free trade to be rather counterproductive. I am currently reading Free Trade Doesn&#039;t Work by Ian Fletcher, which I am finding rather agreeable.

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for clearing that up. Hazlitt is good, however I find his stance (which is the stance of the average Libertarian) on free trade to be rather counterproductive. I am currently reading Free Trade Doesn&#39;t Work by Ian Fletcher, which I am finding rather agreeable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Didact		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2013/08/the-keynesians-bible.html#comment-4262</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Didact]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 16:32:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4262</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://didacticmind.com/2013/08/the-keynesians-bible.html#comment-4261&quot;&gt;Anonymous&lt;/a&gt;.

I would actually strongly recommend that you not even bother with The General Theory. Instead, read Henry Hazlitt&#039;s take on the book, The Failure of the New Economics. You will be spared no small amount of time and tedium in reading Keynes&#039;s &#034;masterpiece&#034;, with all of its density and obfuscation and bad logic. Hazlitt did the job for you by reading it and dissecting it almost literally paragraph by paragraph. And Hazlitt&#039;s work is vastly more readable.

If you must read any work by Keynes, I recommend starting instead with The Economic Consequences of the Peace. If Keynes had written only this book, and left it at that, he would have been remembered without controversy as a great economist. Unfortunately, he wrote his General Theory as well, and forever destroyed economics as a respectable profession.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://didacticmind.com/2013/08/the-keynesians-bible.html#comment-4261">Anonymous</a>.</p>
<p>I would actually strongly recommend that you not even bother with The General Theory. Instead, read Henry Hazlitt&#39;s take on the book, The Failure of the New Economics. You will be spared no small amount of time and tedium in reading Keynes&#39;s &quot;masterpiece&quot;, with all of its density and obfuscation and bad logic. Hazlitt did the job for you by reading it and dissecting it almost literally paragraph by paragraph. And Hazlitt&#39;s work is vastly more readable.</p>
<p>If you must read any work by Keynes, I recommend starting instead with The Economic Consequences of the Peace. If Keynes had written only this book, and left it at that, he would have been remembered without controversy as a great economist. Unfortunately, he wrote his General Theory as well, and forever destroyed economics as a respectable profession.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://didacticmind.com/2013/08/the-keynesians-bible.html#comment-4261</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Aug 2013 15:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-4261</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[HaHa, nice. I am going to get around to reading this book at some sage. Would you recommend that I push it to the top of the list or read another economics book?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HaHa, nice. I am going to get around to reading this book at some sage. Would you recommend that I push it to the top of the list or read another economics book?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
