Game can be used to save a marriage as well as destroy it. The concepts of game are not immoral, they are simply amoral- you can use them to become better at being a man generally, or you can use them to become a d-bag who happens to be very good at scoring with women. Either way, it's a man's individual choice. Athol Kay in particular has put together a rather good approach to using game to improve a marriage.

And yes, my parents are both well aware that the values of their home nation are changing rapidly, not necessarily for the better. (To be clear, "Confucianism" comes from one of the neighbours of my nation, not mine in particular. We call it something different.) That does not change the fact that Confucian values are still strong within the nations where they are practised.

As for Confucianism, just have a long talk with your parents and ask them how the values and culture in the country that they came from has changed. Or even better, ask your grandparents.

Yet again, Game is just a tool. That's it. You can use it for moral or immoral ends, but Game in and of itself has no morality to it. It's simply a recognition of some fundamental truths- many of which, incidentally, are embedded within Scripture. Christianity and Game are not mutex, they are complementary. Moreover, Game can be used to save a marriage just as easily as it can be used to end one. Feminism, however, is simply a violation of truth and as such is actively dangerous.

Confucian values are rapidly declining. Confucianism isn't taken seriously anywhere in the world today.

I'd like to see you tell that to roughly a billion Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, Laotians, and Koreans who happen to believe otherwise.

Feminism and Game are exactly the same. Both use the differences between the sexes in order to benefit one sex. Feminism manipulates men's instincts to make them serve women. Game manipulates women's instincts to make them serve men. Both are harmful to marriage and to society.

The source of morality is religion. When religion dies, morality dies and people become selfish. In the West, this began in the early 1800s with the Christian revival movement which destroyed the moral component of Christianity. In the East, this happened later through Western influence. In particular, Communism destroyed religion in much of the East. Confucian values are rapidly declining. Confucianism isn't taken seriously anywhere in the world today.

Marriage 1.0 is still possible. I know because I have it. But it requires rejection of modern values and culture.

If selfishness and lack of consideration for others are problems unique to Western decadence, why then is the East showing signs of the exact same disease? Confucian values and respect for others are still core beliefs in China and Japan, yet marriage rates and population growth in both have stalled and divorce rates are rising. If Game is a way to satisfy one's greed through hypocrisy and decadence, why then were most marriages in the old "Marriage 1.0" format based on the idea of a man in a leadership position- a core element of Game?

My own parents met and married in line with the old and highly effective standards of Marriage 1.0. In a single generation, that paradigm has been usurped and destroyed to the point where upwardly mobile men like me are wondering whether there is any point to marriage at all. Game is just the name that we use to describe a set of universal truths, and when society comes around to accepting them again, a flourishing and powerful civilisation can be rebuilt around them.

The problem with the West is selfishness and inconsideration for others. Women express this through feminism. Men through Game and MGTOW. It's all the same.